Anchor Colors

2002-09-27 Thread Shehu Dikko
On 07 Sep 2002, David A. Desrosiers wrote: > When plucking this with anchor_color set to anything at all, the > links and anchors are always black. I still see this in a number of sites including the BBC . I can't control how people write th

Re: Anchor Colors

2002-09-27 Thread Robert O'Connor
On 27 Sep 2002 at 20:44, Shehu Dikko wrote: > I still see this in a number of sites including the BBC > . > > I can't control how people write their sites so I'd like to be able to > overwrite. > anchor_color=#FF > anchor_color_override=

Re: Stayondomain for testing

2002-09-27 Thread David A. Desrosiers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > It's pretty modular and innocuous, and is based on the current tip. ..and here's my attempt, using perl. It works for everything I've thrown at it so far. I'll shim this into my spider and get some samples: # -

Re: Anchor Colors

2002-09-27 Thread David A. Desrosiers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > I agree this is annoying. I don't know why BBC, CBC and The Onion all > insist on this for their otherwise very well designed mobile sites. I wouldn't exactly call them "well designed". I took some time yesterday to clean the Onion's site,

RE: Stayondomain for testing

2002-09-27 Thread Nicolas Huillard
> -Message d'origine- > De: David A. Desrosiers [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Date: vendredi 27 septembre 2002 13:13 > À:Plucker Development List > Objet:Re: Stayondomain for testing > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > > > It's pretty modular and innocuous

Re: Anchor Colors

2002-09-27 Thread Shehu Dikko
On 27 Sep 2002, Robert O'Connor wrote: > It would probably be better maintenance in the long run though, > instead of both doing stylesheets and "override" keys, to instead fold > all these into a single style sheet Yes, much better; that's the way to go. s h e h u

RE: Stayondomain for testing

2002-09-27 Thread Jon Wickström
Sorry, can't resist this... And a bit off topic? > The regex that handle this along with the rest is : >$_ =~ s!(^.*?@)|(^.*?//)|([:/].*$)!!g; That won't handle stuff like http://domain.com/something?email=foo@bar > Isn't there somewhere a good reference where one can find the > regex

Re: Stayondomain for testing

2002-09-27 Thread Bill Janssen
Tony, Send it to me ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). Bill ___ plucker-dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.rubberchicken.org/mailman/listinfo/plucker-dev