> "Michael" == Michael Dexter writes:
Michael> Russell Senior wrote:
>> What's the story with the PLUG Advanced Topics talk? I had the
>> impression that someone was going to pick this back up. I have
>> some ideas for people to present, though maybe not such little
>> notice as this wednes
Russell Senior wrote:
> What's the story with the PLUG Advanced Topics talk? I had the
> impression that someone was going to pick this back up. I have some
> ideas for people to present, though maybe not such little notice as
> this wednesday.
I have offered to take this up and have a venue to
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 5:04 PM, Rich Shepard wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Oct 2009, drew wymore wrote:
>
> > This looks like a boogered route but I could be wrong. I've seen people
> > use some funky weird gateways.
> >
> > 0.0.0.0 192.168.55.40.0.0.0 UG1 00
> eth0
>
>
On Mon, 19 Oct 2009, drew wymore wrote:
> This looks like a boogered route but I could be wrong. I've seen people
> use some funky weird gateways.
>
> 0.0.0.0 192.168.55.40.0.0.0 UG1 00 eth0
Drew,
As far as my limited memory recalls, the name 'default' has
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 4:54 PM, Rich Shepard wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Oct 2009, Russell Senior wrote:
>
> > "localnet" "loopback" and "router1.appl-ec" are *not* numeric. The '-n'
> > option will return numeric versions for those. That's what I'd like to
> > see.
>
>My apologies, Russell.
>
> >F
On Mon, 19 Oct 2009, Russell Senior wrote:
> "localnet" "loopback" and "router1.appl-ec" are *not* numeric. The '-n'
> option will return numeric versions for those. That's what I'd like to
> see.
My apologies, Russell.
>From server:
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway
> "Rich" == Rich Shepard writes:
Russell> Try again with the '-n' (don't resolve names) option.
Rich>The '-n' option makes no difference in the results of
Rich> 'route.' Numeric in both cases on both hosts.
>From the server (192.168.55.1):
>
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination
On Mon, 19 Oct 2009, Carlos Konstanski wrote:
>>> Try again with the '-n' (don't resolve names) option.
> That is indicative of a problem. It means you cannot do name
> resolution.
Carlos,
The version of 'route' on Slackware-12.2 here seems to use the '-n' option
the opposite way (as did ear
On Mon, 19 Oct 2009, Rich Shepard wrote:
> Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:59:01 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Rich Shepard
> Reply-To: "General Linux/UNIX discussion and help;civil and on-topic"
>
> To: "General Linux/UNIX discussion and help; civil and on-topic"
>
> Subject: Re: [PLUG] Unidirect
On Mon, 19 Oct 2009, Russell Senior wrote:
> Try again with the '-n' (don't resolve names) option.
Russell,
The '-n' option makes no difference in the results of 'route.' Numeric in
both cases on both hosts.
Rich
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pd
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 12:08 PM, Rich Shepard wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Oct 2009, Joe Pruett wrote:
>
> > why do you think the laptop is 192.168.55.5 when it seems to think it is
> > on 192.168.12.something?
>
>Because the former is what's in /etc/hosts on the server.
>
> I'll look at the wireles
On Mon, 19 Oct 2009, Joe Pruett wrote:
> why do you think the laptop is 192.168.55.5 when it seems to think it is
> on 192.168.12.something?
Because the former is what's in /etc/hosts on the server.
I'll look at the wireless router this evening using a direct connection to
my notebook.
Ri
> "Rich" == Rich Shepard writes:
>> Run /sbin/route on the laptop and the desktop here when you get a
>> chance and post them on the list.
Rich>From the server (192.168.55.1): [...]
Try again with the '-n' (don't resolve names) option.
--
Russell Senior ``I have nine fingers;
> From the server (192.168.55.1):
>
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse
> Iface
> localnet* 255.255.255.0 U 0 00 eth0
> loopback* 255.0.0.0 U 0 00
On Mon, 19 Oct 2009, drew wymore wrote:
> Run /sbin/route on the laptop and the desktop here when you get a chance and
> post them on the list.
Drew,
From the server (192.168.55.1):
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse
Iface
localnet
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 9:10 AM, Joe Pruett wrote:
> >> my guess is that it is doing routing, and it sounds like it is using the
> >> same ip range, which is really confusing.
> >
> > Why's this confusing?
>
> it isn't confusing if the device is bridging between the wireless and the
> wired sid
>> my guess is that it is doing routing, and it sounds like it is using the
>> same ip range, which is really confusing.
>
> Why's this confusing?
it isn't confusing if the device is bridging between the wireless and the
wired side. but when you use the wan port, it does nat routing (unless
t
On Mon, 19 Oct 2009, Joe Pruett wrote:
> my guess is that it is doing routing, and it sounds like it is using the
> same ip range, which is really confusing.
Why's this confusing?
> the best way to check is to find out which port on the wireless linksys
> device is hooked to the netgear devic
>> is this linksys the main router for everything? or is there another
>> device that is your internet router?
>
> It is the connection between the one laptop and everything else, both
> local and remote. There's a Netgear firewall appliance/router to which that
> wireless router is connected.
On Mon, 19 Oct 2009, Joe Pruett wrote:
> is this linksys the main router for everything? or is there another
> device that is your internet router?
Joe,
It is the connection between the one laptop and everything else, both
local and remote. There's a Netgear firewall appliance/router to whic
>> is the wireless acting as a bridge or a router?
>
> I don't know. I tried accessing the unit via the web browser but could not
> connect; I cannot ping it, either. Not sure what I did since the last time I
> futzed with it.
>
>> is the laptop on a different subnet than the rest of your network
On Mon, 19 Oct 2009, wes wrote:
> I have seen security options in wireless router config pages along the
> lines of "wireless isolation" - something about preventing wireless
> clients from talking to other hosts on the network.
wes,
In this case, how could the wireless-connected laptop get m
On Mon, 19 Oct 2009, Fred James wrote:
> (1) Can you attach the laptop in question to the LAN via an Eithernet cable
> (disabling wireless)?
Fred,
The last time I had it connected via ethernet I did not try pinging it
from another host.
> (2) Are there any other host attached to the LAN via
On Mon, 19 Oct 2009, Joe Pruett wrote:
> is the wireless acting as a bridge or a router?
Joe,
I don't know. I tried accessing the unit via the web browser but could not
connect; I cannot ping it, either. Not sure what I did since the last time I
futzed with it.
> is the laptop on a different
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 6:34 AM, Rich Shepard wrote:
> I'd greatly appreciate insights from you professional network admins
> since
> I'm out of ideas.
>
> One host on the network, the Toshiba laptop, communicates via a wireless
> connection to both the LAN and, via the router/bridge the Inter
Rich Shepard wrote:
>I'd greatly appreciate insights from you professional network admins since
> I'm out of ideas.
>
>One host on the network, the Toshiba laptop, communicates via a wireless
> connection to both the LAN and, via the router/bridge the Internet. From the
> laptop I can ping
> I'd greatly appreciate insights from you professional network admins since
> I'm out of ideas.
>
> One host on the network, the Toshiba laptop, communicates via a wireless
> connection to both the LAN and, via the router/bridge the Internet. From the
> laptop I can ping other LAN hosts as wel
I'd greatly appreciate insights from you professional network admins since
I'm out of ideas.
One host on the network, the Toshiba laptop, communicates via a wireless
connection to both the LAN and, via the router/bridge the Internet. From the
laptop I can ping other LAN hosts as well as exte
linux-yug wrote:
> Hi
>
>
>
> Something went wrong...
>
> Installed 8-10 and was going great...
>
> Used rsync to copy files from old computer to new computer..
>
> Now 8-10 does not want to work..
>
> Two examples.
>
> Firefox now will NOT start..
>
> And I can't open a terminal...
>
> I
29 matches
Mail list logo
