On Fri, 8 Jul 2016, John Jason Jordan wrote:
> For my next exercise I am going to see if I can set up rsync to keep the
> contents of my external USB 3.0 drive synced with the Synology. I have
> never figured out rsync, so I am going to start a new thread.
John,
Probably the only rsync
I cannot remember what Synology model you have:
a) If you have ARM based model - than the file system is most likely ext4
b) if you have one of the + models with intel CPU then it is likely btrfs
On the client/PC you are using it as network files system SMB/NFS depending how
you mounted it. So
On Fri, 8 Jul 2016 22:18:06 -0700
wes dijo:
>> so that means that the Synology setup utility must have
>> formatted it.
>This may or may not be the case. If it did, it probably used some
>Linuxy filesystem. Either way, it is unlikely that you will be able to
>affect its
On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 6:03 PM, John Jason Jordan
wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Jul 2016 15:47:45 -0700
> John Jason Jordan dijo:
>
> >I'm probably pretty close, but need help figuring out the rest.
>
> Success! I was missing the Sharing stuff in the web-based setup
On Fri, 24 Jun 2016 13:38:47 -0700
wes dijo:
>> Whichever of these is the easiest is the one I want. :)
>>
>> Ideally the contents of the drive would be visible in a Thunar window
>> so I can just drag and drop files the same as I do with my current
>> USB 3.0 external drive.
On Tue, 21 Jun 2016 21:04:39 -0700
John Jason Jordan dijo:
>I need a NAS system which includes a two-bay enclosure capable of
>holding two 6TB drives, and I want to start out with just one 6TB
>drive.
Thanks again to all for the help and suggestions. Just now I placed an
On Saturday, June 25, 2016 12:26:59 PM wes wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 9:49 PM, Tomas Kuchta
> wrote:
> > On Friday, June 24, 2016 04:21:17 PM wes wrote:
> > > > I do not see too many positives for using SMB on linux, without real
> >
> > samba
> >
> > > >
Is this linux forum? Did I miss something?
On Friday, June 24, 2016 11:20:26 PM r...@dimstar.net wrote:
> > On Jun 24, 2016, at 9:49 PM, Tomas Kuchta
> > wrote:
> >
> > Just wondering - Would you share how do you mount SMB in user space?
> > I mean mount not type
On 6/25/16 4:41 PM, Michael Rasmussen wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 03:47:18PM -0500, Louis Kowolowski wrote:
>>> Regarding XFS, why would you need ways to zero out data? I
>>> thought the whole point was to keep the data…isn’t that why we’re
>>> storing it? I mean…srsly.
> To prevent those
On Jun 25, 2016, at 6:41 PM, Michael Rasmussen wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 03:47:18PM -0500, Louis Kowolowski wrote:
>> Regarding XFS, why would you need ways to zero out data? I thought the whole
>> point was to keep the data…isn’t that why we’re storing it? I
On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 03:47:18PM -0500, Louis Kowolowski wrote:
> Regarding XFS, why would you need ways to zero out data? I thought the whole
> point was to keep the data…isn’t that why we’re storing it? I mean…srsly.
To prevent those that should have access to what is private to getting at
On Jun 24, 2016, at 12:41 AM, Michael Dexter wrote:
>
> On 6/22/16 9:52 AM, Vedanta Teacher wrote:
>> This may or may not help... but ixsystems sells a FreeNAS Mimi
>> with 4 bays for $999 @ https://www.ixsystems.com/freenas-mini/
>> I've never used the FreeNAS OS myself .
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 9:49 PM, Tomas Kuchta
wrote:
>
>
> On Friday, June 24, 2016 04:21:17 PM wes wrote:
> > > I do not see too many positives for using SMB on linux, without real
> samba
> > > user space mount option available.
> >
> > As much as I hesitate to
> On Jun 24, 2016, at 9:49 PM, Tomas Kuchta
> wrote:
>
> Just wondering - Would you share how do you mount SMB in user space?
> I mean mount not type smb://serverName/dir into some sort of GUI browser
But that is exactly how you mount in Windows. Then you assign
On Friday, June 24, 2016 04:21:17 PM wes wrote:
> > I do not see too many positives for using SMB on linux, without real samba
> > user space mount option available.
>
> As much as I hesitate to spend any time advocating for M$-originated
> technologies, I must say I do not see the challenge
>>
>>
>>
>> I do not see too many positives for using SMB on linux, without real
>> samba
>> user space mount option available.
>>
>>
> As much as I hesitate to spend any time advocating for M$-originated
> technologies, I must say I do not see the challenge here. I mount SMB
> shares (from all
>
>
>
> I do not see too many positives for using SMB on linux, without real samba
> user space mount option available.
>
>
As much as I hesitate to spend any time advocating for M$-originated
technologies, I must say I do not see the challenge here. I mount SMB
shares (from all walks of OS life)
On Friday, June 24, 2016 02:52:10 PM John Jason Jordan wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Jun 2016 13:38:47 -0700
>
> wes dijo:
> >On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 12:25 PM, John Jason Jordan
> >
> > wrote:
> >> On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 15:23:02 -0700
> >>
> >> wes
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 2:52 PM, John Jason Jordan
wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Jun 2016 13:38:47 -0700
> wes dijo:
>
> >On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 12:25 PM, John Jason Jordan
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 15:23:02 -0700
> >> wes
On Fri, 24 Jun 2016 13:38:47 -0700
wes dijo:
>On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 12:25 PM, John Jason Jordan
> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 15:23:02 -0700
>> wes dijo:
>>
>> >Most NAS devices support multiple protocols. NFS is relatively rare
>>
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 12:25 PM, John Jason Jordan
wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 15:23:02 -0700
> wes dijo:
>
> >Most NAS devices support multiple protocols. NFS is relatively rare
> >these days. I would expect it to support SMB (Windows-style file
>
On Fri, 24 Jun 2016, John Jason Jordan wrote:
> Ideally the contents of the drive would be visible in a Thunar window so I
> can just drag and drop files the same as I do with my current USB 3.0
> external drive. It would make my life a lot easier if I don't have to
> access the drive from a
On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 15:23:02 -0700
wes dijo:
>Most NAS devices support multiple protocols. NFS is relatively rare
>these days. I would expect it to support SMB (Windows-style file
>sharing) which is supported fairly ubiquitously.
>From the Synology description/features sheet:
On 6/22/16 9:52 AM, Vedanta Teacher wrote:
> This may or may not help... but ixsystems sells a FreeNAS Mimi
> with 4 bays for $999 @ https://www.ixsystems.com/freenas-mini/
> I've never used the FreeNAS OS myself .
Well, some of us have. In fact, I have been doing 3+ years of FreeNAS
support.
I can highly recommend Synology, DSxxx
I use Synology NAS for about 6 years after switching from Netgear Readynas.
Compared to what I could build myself and/or Readynas - Synology is faster,
has more features, quiet, lower power, cheaper and absolutely trouble free.
Having NAS is not free (as
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 11:50 AM, John Jason Jordan
wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Jun 2016 08:40:46 -0700
> David Gibbons dijo:
>
> >I've been very happy with my Synology, replaced a home built Freenas
> >and lost none of the features/functionality I was using in
On Wed, 22 Jun 2016 08:40:46 -0700
David Gibbons dijo:
>I've been very happy with my Synology, replaced a home built Freenas
>and lost none of the features/functionality I was using in freenas.
>Less management overhead, lower power usage. A+++ Would buy again.
Thanks to all
This may or may not help... but ixsystems sells a FreeNAS Mimi
with 4 bays for $999 @ https://www.ixsystems.com/freenas-mini/
I've never used the FreeNAS OS myself .
Blessings,
Paul W.
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 9:04 PM, John Jason Jordan
wrote:
> I need a NAS system which
I've been very happy with my Synology, replaced a home built Freenas and
lost none of the features/functionality I was using in freenas. Less
management overhead, lower power usage. A+++ Would buy again.
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 7:03 AM, r...@dimstar.net wrote:
> Synology runs
Synology runs Linux under the hood. Im running several of them at several
different clients.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jun 21, 2016, at 9:04 PM, John Jason Jordan wrote:
>
> I need a NAS system which includes a two-bay enclosure capable of
> holding two 6TB drives, and I
I need a NAS system which includes a two-bay enclosure capable of
holding two 6TB drives, and I want to start out with just one 6TB
drive. From my research so far I have determined that Western
Digital red drives are the best for this application, so the WD
WD60EFRX drive is at the top of my list.
31 matches
Mail list logo