On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 9:20 PM, Russell Senior
wrote:
>> "Kirk" == Kirk Goins writes:
>
> Kirk> "Once again Linux has proven to me it is only good for non
> Kirk> critical apps"
>
> This is actually a crappy way to ask for help, just so you know.
>
> Since I know from long experience just ho
On Mar 15, 2012, at 8:44 PM, Fred James wrote:
> Kirk Goins wrote:
>> Just before leaving for Seattle the other day my Ubunto desktop system said
>> there were updates. So I told it to download and install and promptly
>> forgot I had done so until I got home tonight. It was asking to reboot to
>>
On 2012-03-16 13:08, Kirk Goins wrote:
> I was able to get to GRUB '1' time and picked the previous kernel
> which is
> .38 vs .39 and the system booted correctly. Since then I can't get
> the
> timing correct to get back into GRUB. So 2 basic questions.
>
> #1 What line to a I add/change/delete
On Mar 16, 2012, at 12:22 PM, Mike Connors wrote:
> I don't run Ubuntu for this and many other reasons. Is LTS and/or Ubuntu
> Server (same thing?), a better option
> for people running critical apps who don't want to get burned by auto
> updates?
LTS is their "Long Term Support" version. 10.04
On Fri, 16 Mar 2012, Kirk Goins wrote:
> I was able to get to GRUB '1' time and picked the previous kernel which is
> .38 vs .39 and the system booted correctly. Since then I can't get the
> timing correct to get back into GRUB. So 2 basic questions.
>
> #1 What line to a I add/change/delete in t
I was able to get to GRUB '1' time and picked the previous kernel which is
.38 vs .39 and the system booted correctly. Since then I can't get the
timing correct to get back into GRUB. So 2 basic questions.
#1 What line to a I add/change/delete in the config file to make GRUB pause
for say 10 seco
>
> Kirk Goins wrote:
> > Just before leaving for Seattle the other day my Ubunto desktop system
> said
> > there were updates. So I told it to download and install and promptly
> > forgot I had done so until I got home tonight. It was asking to reboot to
> > finish the updates. Well it is dead no
On 2012-03-16 09:40, Russell Senior wrote:
>> "Kirk" == Kirk Goins writes:
>
> Kirk> I will see what I can do over the weekend. The Base OS is (
> was?
> Kirk> ) Ubuntu 10.04.2 LTS. I have found the DVD and booted from it.
> I
> Kirk> can mount the drive and I can see and navigate through th
Here is the output from script that collects boot info
Boot Info Script 0.60from 17 May 2011
= Boot Info Summary:
===
=> Grub2 (v1.97-1.98) is installed in the MBR of /dev/sda and looks at
sector
1 of the same har
Kirk Goins wrote:
> Just before leaving for Seattle the other day my Ubunto desktop system said
> there were updates. So I told it to download and install and promptly
> forgot I had done so until I got home tonight. It was asking to reboot to
> finish the updates. Well it is dead now
I have a fe
> "Kirk" == Kirk Goins writes:
Kirk> I will see what I can do over the weekend. The Base OS is ( was?
Kirk> ) Ubuntu 10.04.2 LTS. I have found the DVD and booted from it. I
Kirk> can mount the drive and I can see and navigate through the
Kirk> folders etc.
Kirk> I don't see a grub prompts as
Rich Shepard wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Mar 2012, Fred James wrote:
>
>
>> Someone else has responded with suggestion(s) to help ... my (OT) 2 cents
>> is to marvel at the number of people who (whether running MS, Linux, OSX,
>> UNIX, or what have you) will apply patches/updates/upgrades, untested, to
You are very right, but after a long day and a nasty drive home from
Seattle, blah, blah.. Anyway Sorry Everyone.
I will see what I can do over the weekend. The Base OS is ( was? ) Ubuntu
10.04.2 LTS. I have found the DVD and booted from it. I can mount the drive
and I can see and navigate through
On 2012-03-15 20:02, Kirk Goins wrote:
> [0,665225] Kernel Panic - not syncing: VFS Unable to mount root fs on
> unknown-block(0,0)
>
> Is this fixable or will I need to scrap and reload?
Should be fixable.
There are many questions particulars to how your system was set up for
us to just say "do
On Thu, 15 Mar 2012, Fred James wrote:
> Someone else has responded with suggestion(s) to help ... my (OT) 2 cents
> is to marvel at the number of people who (whether running MS, Linux, OSX,
> UNIX, or what have you) will apply patches/updates/upgrades, untested, to
> a critical machine/OS/applica
>
> Kirk> "Once again Linux has proven to me it is only good for non
> Kirk> critical apps"
>
> This is actually a crappy way to ask for help, just so you know.
>
> Since I know from long experience just how awesome Linux is for
> applications of every variety, I immediately discount your obvious
>
Kirk Goins wrote:
> Just before leaving for Seattle the other day my Ubunto desktop system said
> there were updates. So I told it to download and install and promptly
> forgot I had done so until I got home tonight. It was asking to reboot to
> finish the updates. Well it is dead now with a
>
> [
> "Kirk" == Kirk Goins writes:
Kirk> "Once again Linux has proven to me it is only good for non
Kirk> critical apps"
This is actually a crappy way to ask for help, just so you know.
Since I know from long experience just how awesome Linux is for
applications of every variety, I immediately
On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 20:02:19 -0700
Kirk Goins wrote:
> Just before leaving for Seattle the other day my Ubunto desktop
> system said there were updates. So I told it to download and install
> and promptly forgot I had done so until I got home tonight. It was
> asking to reboot to finish the updat
Just before leaving for Seattle the other day my Ubunto desktop system said
there were updates. So I told it to download and install and promptly
forgot I had done so until I got home tonight. It was asking to reboot to
finish the updates. Well it is dead now with a
[0,665225] Kernel Panic - not
20 matches
Mail list logo