I have found this regular rsync aproach inadequate with constant
babysitting sideffects.
These are desktops, so network filesystem would resolve this and more.
On laptops, I would recommend to use something like NextCloud synchronizing
to a master location.
Those two options do work better for
I deleted my Facebook account several months ago (should have done it years
before), and so far, no "please come back messages".
On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 12:59 PM Keith Lofstrom wrote:
> After an irksome hour of frobbing, I finally managed to
> delete a 12 year old facebook account. Password
On 11/15/18 2:03 PM, Ben Koenig wrote:
One of my favorite things about Slackware is that it ships with both XFCE
and KDE.
... and blackbox, and fvwm2, and WindowMaker, and fluxbox, and ...
:-)
Chacun a son gout,
Rich
___
PLUG mailing list
On 11/15/18 2:03 PM, Ben Koenig wrote:
I feel like I've seen something like that before.
That said GUI bugs are notoriously difficult to identify via email. The G
stands for Graphical, so the only way to see and understand it is to look
at the problem with your own eyes.
I would not be
I feel like I've seen something like that before.
That said GUI bugs are notoriously difficult to identify via email. The G
stands for Graphical, so the only way to see and understand it is to look
at the problem with your own eyes.
I would not be surprised if your GUI is doing something funky,
I should suggest looking at postgrey.
Back many years ago (in a previous life/job) I sent up 6 or so MX
servers (forwarders) for a small ISP. Once I got postgrey installed and
running I saw 90%+ drop in SPAM to just my email address.
YMMV,
Rod
--
On 11/15/18 10:47 AM, Michael Christopher
After an irksome hour of frobbing, I finally managed to
delete a 12 year old facebook account. Password long
lost, so I had to jump through MANY hoops.
If your setup is like mine, copy /etc/postfix/main.cf
to a backup file FIRST.
Facebook's email address for me is my personal server,
which has
> Nov 15 12:33:58 goose postfix/smtpd[7613]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
> unknown[60.178.154.107]: 450 4.1.1 <
> 1068617380.19938.18.ca...@goose.robinson-west.com>: Recipient address
> rejected: unverified address: unknown user:
> "1068617380.19938.18.camel"; from=<1362248...@qq.com> to=<
>
Sounds like address verification is safe to use. Here's the link:
http://www.postfix.org/ADDRESS_VERIFICATION_README.html#how
For this DMARC thing, the following seems to be the main site for it:
How does DMARC work and is it something that a personal email server
should use?
-- Michael C. Robinson
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
On Thu, 15 Nov 2018, Michael Christopher Robinson wrote:
I'm wondering if Address Verification is safe to deploy in production and
if not what to do instead?
If you're running postfix you can set up /etc/postfix/badaddr and
../badip. The first has domain names, the second has IP addresses.
On Thu, 15 Nov 2018, Smith, Cathy wrote:
Just as a suggestion, get your backup running manually first before
running from cron. That reduces the time for troubleshooting. Understand
what your rsync is doing. Validate that your backup on the destination is
good. If you are going to use ssh keys,
The Display for the Noodle Pi has been discontinued without a compatible
replacement for the project.
On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 10:57 AM Nat Taylor wrote:
> I may have to check out the Noodle pi too!
>
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 8:35 AM Richard Owlett
> wrote:
>
> > On 11/15/2018 09:29 AM, Nat
I may have to check out the Noodle pi too!
On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 8:35 AM Richard Owlett wrote:
> On 11/15/2018 09:29 AM, Nat Taylor wrote:
> > The Dual Boot Gemini is in production, and is available in wifi-only.
> > You can buy it here:
> >
>
Looking at the spam I get, it doesn't take long to notice that the from
address is probably forged. I've studied Address Verification by
looking at the howto on how to set it up. I'm concerned that postfix
has to make assumptions for address verification to even work and that
these assumptions
Even the shell in cron could be different from your login shell. Only the
location running cron should be affected.
The ~/ is a shell alias pointing to the $HOME variable.
On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 10:07 AM Rich Shepard
wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Nov 2018, Larry Brigman wrote:
>
> > Note that none of
Just as a suggestion, get your backup running manually first before running
from cron. That reduces the time for troubleshooting. Understand what your
rsync is doing. Validate that your backup on the destination is good. If
you are going to use ssh keys, get that tested. Then put
On Thu, 15 Nov 2018, Smith, Cathy wrote:
There are a lot of examples available if you google for rsync tutorial or
rsync examples. Search for examples of using rsync for backups.
Thank you, Cathy.
Rich
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@pdxlinux.org
Take a look at the man page from cron. When a job executes from cron, you
don't even get your default path. You have to set the variables, including
your path in your script. Or you have to specify the full path in the command
syntax that is executed.
--
Cathy L. Smith
IT Engineer
Pacific
There are a lot of examples available if you google for rsync tutorial or rsync
examples. Search for examples of using rsync for backups.
You may need to specify the source path, /, and the destination path, /. If
you are rsync'ing everything, then /data should be included by default. That
On Thu, 15 Nov 2018, Larry Brigman wrote:
Note that none of your shell variables from your login will be set when
you run from cron.
Larry,
Would this affect synchronizing files in ~/ on both hosts?
Thanks,
Rich
___
PLUG mailing list
On Thu, 15 Nov 2018, Louis Kowolowski wrote:
You might be interested in looking at syncthing. Its designed to replicate
things from 1 place to another. You can even set it up such that one is
the "master" and it doesn't accept changes from other nodes.
Louis,
I will look at synthing.
Note that none of your shell variables from your login will be set when you
run from cron.
On Thu, Nov 15, 2018, 7:53 AM Rich Shepard I want to update ~/ on the new desktop with changes made in ~/ on the
> old
> desktop using rsync in a daily cron job. The old desktop has a directory
> ~/data
More details. The problem appears when I copy two files at once, and
then try to rename them. (One at a time, of course.) If I copy one file
and rename it, and then copy the other file and rename it, it works
okay. But if I copy the two files in one move, and then try to rename
them, one at a
On Wed, 14 Nov 2018, Rich Shepard wrote:
Regenerating the public/private key pairs on the new desktop allowed
rsync, ssh, and scp to work once more. And they sill do today. Whew!
I found the problem: for some reason that I had a line in ~/.bash_logout
that told ssh-agent to dump the key.
On 11/15/2018 09:29 AM, Nat Taylor wrote:
The Dual Boot Gemini is in production, and is available in wifi-only.
You can buy it here:
https://store.planetcom.co.uk/collections/gemini-pda/products/gemini-pda-wifi-only?variant=6314880499739
Was referring to it when I said "I'm tracking it." I
On 11/15/2018 09:10 AM, Johnathan Mantey wrote:
Richard,
I viewed one of the links I provided in the "old devices" thread, related
to this one. It seems based on what I just read that the *Noodle Pi* may
be very close to your list of requirements.
Mea Culpa.
I investigated Raspberry Pi about
I want to update ~/ on the new desktop with changes made in ~/ on the old
desktop using rsync in a daily cron job. The old desktop has a directory
~/data while the newdesktop has a /data partition separate from /home.
There is an --exclude option to rsync and I'm not sure where it should go
Richard,
I viewed one of the links I provided in the "old devices" thread, related
to this one. It seems based on what I just read that the *Noodle Pi* may
be very close to your list of requirements.
I also sent another link, which I have not viewed, comparing 5 different
handheld devices
On 11/13/2018 07:46 PM, Russell Senior wrote:
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 1:26 PM Richard Owlett wrote:
I know I have *WEIRD* preferences.
How should I pose questions in a manner that they would be taken
_ *EXTREMELY LITERALLY* _?
You should pose it knowing that you may get answers that
30 matches
Mail list logo
