So I got in the mail today notification that rapidwave got bought by
Digis. Hm... Last I checked Digis wasn't too compatible with my
internet needs (bandwidth slowing, too many people on the same nodes, etc.)
So, afconnect is not an option where I am in North American Fork (Near
Cedar Hills) W
NO
On 16 Apr 2013, at 16:06 , Dennis Muhlestein wrote:
> So I got in the mail today notification that rapidwave got bought by
> Digis. Hm... Last I checked Digis wasn't too compatible with my
> internet needs (bandwidth
Don't you mean http://nooo.com/ ?
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Wade Shearer wrote:
> NO
>
>
> On 16 Apr 2013, at 16:06 , Dennis Muhlestein wrote:
>
>> So I got in the mail today notification that rapidwave go
On Tue, April 16, 2013 16:06, Dennis Muhlestein wrote:
> So I got in the mail today notification that rapidwave got bought by
> Digis. Hm... Last I checked Digis wasn't too compatible with my
> internet needs (bandwidth slowing, too many people on the same nodes, etc.)
>
> So, afconnect is not an
On 4/16/13 4:33 PM, Alan Young wrote:
> Don't you mean http://nooo.com/ ?
>
Yes actually, that is indeed the site I was looking for.
Much appreciated.
Still in need of ISP though.. :)
/*
PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net
Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plu
Did they upgrade you to IPv6 as well? I have to admit that, while I
generally have avoided Comcast, their recently improved bandwidth, and
their IPv6 offering makes me tempted. My (very technically-minded) boss
gets both good bandwidth (don't know exactly what), and IPv6 today at
his house in Spr
On 16 Apr 2013, at 17:04, Ryan Simpkins wrote:
> You may want to check out CenturyLink's FTTN service. My understanding is that
> they have (finally) figured out how to do it right. Though I personally had an
> experience with them that made Comcast look deserving of a customer service
> award b
On Wed, April 17, 2013 08:08, Lloyd Brown wrote:
> Did they upgrade you to IPv6 as well? I have to admit that, while I
> generally have avoided Comcast, their recently improved bandwidth, and
> their IPv6 offering makes me tempted. My (very technically-minded) boss
> gets both good bandwidth (don
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 4:06 PM, Dennis Muhlestein
wrote:
> What next?
Move to Provo?
http://www.theverge.com/2013/4/17/4234258/google-fiber-is-coming-to-provo-utah
/*
PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net
Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug
Don't fear the penguin.
*/
On Tuesday, April 16, 2013 04:33:09 PM Alan Young wrote:
> Don't you mean http://nooo.com/ ?
I prefer http://www.khaaan.com/
/*
PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net
Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug
Don't fear the penguin.
*/
On 4/16/13 5:04 PM, Ryan Simpkins wrote:
> On Tue, April 16, 2013 16:06, Dennis Muhlestein wrote:
>
> Recently I've been happy with Comcast. Despite their questionable business
> practices, the actual product is quite functional. I just got upgraded last
> night and tested a solid 55Mbps down and 1
On 2013-04-23 17:59, Dennis Muhlestein wrote:
> On 4/16/13 5:04 PM, Ryan Simpkins wrote:
>> On Tue, April 16, 2013 16:06, Dennis Muhlestein wrote:
>>
>> Recently I've been happy with Comcast. Despite their questionable business
>> practices, the actual product is quite functional. I just got upgrad
On 4/23/2013 6:44 PM, Jima wrote:
> On 2013-04-23 17:59, Dennis Muhlestein wrote:
>> On 4/16/13 5:04 PM, Ryan Simpkins wrote:
>>> On Tue, April 16, 2013 16:06, Dennis Muhlestein wrote:
>>>
>>> Recently I've been happy with Comcast. Despite their questionable business
>>> practices, the actual produ
On 2013-04-23 19:18, Tod Hansmann wrote:
> The static IPs
> work as you expect. This is in contrast to their business fiber, which
> can be a bit wonky (you get a /30 that you don't pay for as a
> "management" subnet and your /29 or whatever is routed to your
> management IP. Odd, but it works g
On 4/23/2013 9:32 PM, Jima wrote:
> On 2013-04-23 19:18, Tod Hansmann wrote:
> > The static IPs
>> work as you expect. This is in contrast to their business fiber, which
>> can be a bit wonky (you get a /30 that you don't pay for as a
>> "management" subnet and your /29 or whatever is routed to
On 2013-04-24 00:15, Tod Hansmann wrote:
> On 4/23/2013 9:32 PM, Jima wrote:
>> On 2013-04-23 19:18, Tod Hansmann wrote:
>>> The static IPs
>>> work as you expect. This is in contrast to their business fiber, which
>>> can be a bit wonky (you get a /30 that you don't pay for as a
>>> "manageme
On 4/23/13 6:44 PM, Jima wrote:
> On 2013-04-23 17:59, Dennis Muhlestein wrote:
>> On 4/16/13 5:04 PM, Ryan Simpkins wrote:
>>> On Tue, April 16, 2013 16:06, Dennis Muhlestein wrote:
>>>
>With Comcast? Last I checked (a few years ago, in Minnesota), that
> would require a business-class accoun
On 4/24/13 6:44 AM, Jima wrote:
>You do need the /30 for a couple of those, actually. There are ways
> around the others (like a transparent bridging firewall).
>
>With IPv6, the point-to-point subnet is actually MORE important, not
> less. Have you ever dealt with an on-link /48? It's c
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 7:18 PM, Tod Hansmann wrote:
> This is in contrast to their business fiber, which
> can be a bit wonky (you get a /30 that you don't pay for as a
> "management" subnet and your /29 or whatever is routed to your
> management IP. Odd, but it works great thus far.)
This sty
On Tuesday, April 23, 2013 06:44:25 PM Jima wrote:
> On 2013-04-23 17:59, Dennis Muhlestein wrote:
> > On 4/16/13 5:04 PM, Ryan Simpkins wrote:
> >> On Tue, April 16, 2013 16:06, Dennis Muhlestein wrote:
> >>
> >> Recently I've been happy with Comcast. Despite their questionable
> >> business
> >>
On 2013-04-24 08:27, Dennis Muhlestein wrote:
> Hm, for me I don't host anything, but I do occasionally connect from the
> outside with ssh and/or vnc. So even if my ip address isn't static, I
> need to be able to forward ports in. I'm not sure even that'll work
> though with Comcast residential.
On 2013-04-24 11:25, Jacob Albretsen wrote:
> Do they play stupid pricing games with their business class? First 6 - 12
> month is one price, then it doubles the next 12 months and you have to do a 2
> year contract kind of garbage?
It's been a little while, but I don't remember the price games
On 4/24/2013 8:41 AM, Steve Meyers wrote:
> On 4/24/13 6:44 AM, Jima wrote:
>> You do need the /30 for a couple of those, actually. There are ways
>> around the others (like a transparent bridging firewall).
>>
>> With IPv6, the point-to-point subnet is actually MORE important, not
>> les
On 2013-04-24 18:41, Tod Hansmann wrote:
> I can say with certainty, sleep or no, that my 27/7 is much nicer than my 7/.8
Funny, that's kind of how I feel about my 100/100. :-)
Jima
/*
PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net
Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug
Don'
On 4/24/2013 7:18 PM, Jima wrote:
> On 2013-04-24 18:41, Tod Hansmann wrote:
>> I can say with certainty, sleep or no, that my 27/7 is much nicer than my
>> 7/.8
>Funny, that's kind of how I feel about my 100/100. :-)
>
>
I can also say with certainty that I don't like Jima right now =cP
On 04/24/2013 06:41 PM, Tod Hansmann wrote:
>
> On 4/24/2013 8:41 AM, Steve Meyers wrote:
>> On 4/24/13 6:44 AM, Jima wrote:
>>> You do need the /30 for a couple of those, actually. There are ways
>>> around the others (like a transparent bridging firewall).
>>>
>>> With IPv6, the point-t
On 4/25/13 1:46 PM, Robert Fleming wrote:
>
> The limitation you will have is that you won't get huge uplink unless
> you go with business class. They keep that pretty low.
How fast is "huge"? My current uplink really isn't that great anyway.
What is expected on CC?
-D
/*
PLUG: http://plug.
I agree with most of Corey's outline. Just to throw a few minor
points in...
On 2013-04-25 14:53, Corey Edwards wrote:
> On 04/24/2013 06:41 PM, Tod Hansmann wrote:
>> Having not slept since Monday night, all of this is making less and less
>> sense as we go. I may well need a diagram to clea
*at 6:48am on 4/24/2013, Jima wrote:*
* *
*> Funny, that's kind of how I feel about my 100/100. :-)*
* *
*Yea, a full 100mbs up and down would be nice, no doubt. Too bad most of us
don't have that ability.*
* *
*--- Dan*
/*
PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net
Unsubscribe: http:/
*At 6:48 AM, Todd Hansmann wrote:*
* *
*>>> Do you have static ip addresses with Comcast? Did you have to*
*>>> pay extra?*
*>> With Comcast? Last I checked (a few years ago, in Minnesota), that*
*>> would require a business-class account, which is more expensive per*
*>> month for less bandw
*At 2:23am on 4/26/2013, Corey Edwards wrote:*
* *
* *
*> You're on the right track. Maybe I can get you the rest of the way there.
*
* *
*That's interesting. I seem to recall things like that when I worked for
the (now defunct) C4 communications. This brings a question to my mind. In
each sce
On 2013-04-27 03:57, Dan Egli wrote:
> *A 27/7 line? I didn't know Comcast offered such a beast. I'm also
> surprised Comcast is offering static IPs at all. Last I looked, which was
> admittedly quite a long time ago (many years) Comcast didn't offer static
> IP at all. The best you could get was a
With fully routable ip addresses you have no need for NAT on your router in
the case you mention.
The ISP would simply route all traffic destined for any address in your
block to your router, and you simply configure your router's routing table
and you're done. The linux-based router distros are us
On 2013-04-29 12:53, Nicholas Leippe wrote:
> With fully routable ip addresses you have no need for NAT on your router in
> the case you mention.
If you have enough IP addresses, which for many American households,
is not a viable approach. Additionally, this approach is (in general)
bad for
*On April 28, 2013, Jima wrote: *
* *
*> When I used Comcast for internet, my IP rarely changed. Actually,*
*> thinking back, I'm not sure it changed i the year we had it. I'd have*
*> to check my dynamic DNS logs to be certain, though.*
* *
*Well, that's what their web page said all those ye
On 4/24/2013 5:31 PM, Jima wrote:
> On 2013-04-24 08:27, Dennis Muhlestein wrote:
>> Hm, for me I don't host anything, but I do occasionally connect from the
>> outside with ssh and/or vnc. So even if my ip address isn't static, I
>> need to be able to forward ports in. I'm not sure even that'll
36 matches
Mail list logo
