They are very related Network QoS exists because there are limits in how much
networking gear transmits packets and frames. There is a lot more to it than
just writing the policy. There is a cost to engineer that out.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Nov 24, 2017, at 12:59 PM, Stephen Partington wrot
It is not that simple in my mind. Network QoS is very different then the
possibility of the customers pay extra for additional services.
Besides Netflix has cache devices that can and are frequently in local is
Datacenters to alleviate latency and Bw issues.
And given the current fcc chairs attit
I will start with some thoughts on why I find the NN debate troubling.
First there is a technical misunderstanding. NN is built on the idea that
ISPs should treat all traffic equally. This concept is simply unrealistic.
Bandwidth is a limited resource there is only so much data that a Ethernet
port
per your suggestion, I have started a new thread with questions related to the
mentioned issues.
debate away!
-eric
from the central offices of the technomage Guild, internet debating society.
On Nov 24, 2017, at 10:01 AM, Herminio Hernandez Jr. wrote:
> I work in the networking field and I ca
well, as someone else suggested, a new thread.
so, shall we start the discussion?
ok, as mentioned, bandwidth is a limited resource. the question is How limited?
Then there is the question: can an ISP curtail certain types of traffic (null
route it, delay it, other bandwidth shaping routines)?
Thanks for those explanations, James!
ps -efH is a very helpful tip!
> Chrome runs each tab in a seperate process, and the same for plugins,
> though sometimes those are shared. If you run ps -ef instead of top and
> get the parent processid, they'd likely share a common parent. You c
I work in the networking field and I can tell you that the idea that all
traffic can be treated equally is nonsense. If you want services esp latency
sensitive ones like voice and video to be delivered reliably then there will be
traffic shaping. Bandwidth is a limited resource.
p.s. do not wa
h. well, I wasn't going to mention these alternative methods owing to their
precarious legal nature.
btw, ISp's are starting to take a hard line on things like pirating. I have 1
neighbor who will no longer be able to get internet from any provider here in
my neighborhood. Basically, he was
already done. there is even a change.org petition. I have also filed comments
on their comments page. believe me, I tried to keep it dry, technical and
logical. however, these are politicians we are dealing with here.
-eric
from the central offices of the technomage Guild, Internet Regulatory
A
If you've ever worked in networking at a carrier or isp level, you know net
neutrality never really was to begin with. From the beginnings of time,
there's been a feature called "quality of service" that makes sure some
traffic is always more important than other traffics, so this has always
been
On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 23:50:33 -0700
Eric Oyen wrote:
> well,
> the media cartels can go pound sand as far as I am concerned. I can
> get most of the content I want from Amazon, netflix, hulu (if I could
> ever get around the accessibility issues) or even youtube tv.
You'd better hurry up and giv
11 matches
Mail list logo
