Caching bind server install is I think as easy as "apt-get install
bind9" still on ubuntu (behind a firewall mind you). I run a pair of
bind servers, but mostly because I run some internal domains at home to
keep track of various server instances and devices. My good old dns
ser
Heh! Like minds think alike :)
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 1:39 PM, kitepi...@kitepilot.com <
kitepi...@kitepilot.com> wrote:
> I would save myself the grief of running a DNS and set my resolv.conf to
> 8.8.8.8 and 8.8.4.4
> See:
> http://www.linuxfromscratch.**org/lfs/vie
An easier solution would be to switch to a public DNS like
Open DNS:
208.67.220.220
208.67.222.222
Google:
4.4.4.4
8.8.8.8
I NEVER use my ISPs DNS servers :)
JD
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 1:25 PM, Derek Trotter wrote:
> Since I signed up with my ISP I've had trouble with dns. Someti
I would save myself the grief of running a DNS and set my resolv.conf to
8.8.8.8 and 8.8.4.4
See:
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/stable/chapter07/network.html
ET
Derek Trotter writes:
Since I signed up with my ISP I've had trouble with dns. Sometimes urls
take a long ti
I occassionally have similiar issues. I do 2 things. I have a local DNS
server that forwards to OpenDNS. This allows me to fiddle with things as I
want, and keeps me off the ISP's horrible DNS services.
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 1:25 PM, Derek Trotter wrote:
> Since I signed up with my
Since I signed up with my ISP I've had trouble with dns. Sometimes urls
take a long time to resolve. Other times I get errors saying the url
couldn't be found. Sometimes a page won't load properly because parts
of it come from other urls and those don't resolve. Calls to
Nope and nope :)
This is old but covers it pretty well :
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=236093
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 12:54 PM, Derek Trotter wrote:
> I'm thinking of running dns at home on my linux box(kubuntu 8). I don't
> want a caching server. Would this be dif
No, this is somewhat arcane, but depending on what functions you want, can
be quite simple. DNS works by reference, so you don't load the world's DNS
onto your server. That server will still need valid external DNS servers.
I prefer BIND, myself. I have friends that enjoy PowerDNS.
Hi Derek,
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 12:54 PM, Derek Trotter wrote:
> I'm thinking of running dns at home on my linux box(kubuntu 8). I don't
> want a caching server. Would this be difficult to set up? Would this
> consume a lot of bandwidth?
>
> There are some security
I'm thinking of running dns at home on my linux box(kubuntu 8). I don't
want a caching server. Would this be difficult to set up? Would this
consume a lot of bandwidth?
Thanks
--
"One mistake up here and it's half a day out with the undert
On 06/18/2011 08:29 AM, keith smith wrote:
I agree. I enjoyed installing and configuring Qmail Toaster. However I
have lots of other things that demand my time. It's not feasible for me
to run a mail server - would be a lot of fun though. There are other
considerations as well.
I've had a Q
less thing for me to worry about.
>
> Thank you for working through this with me.
>
>
> Keith Smith
>
> --- On *Sat, 6/18/11, Lisa Kachold * wrote:
>
>
> From: Lisa Kachold
> Subject: Re: Rackspace email & DNS
> To: "Main P
#!/bin/bash
#
## Adapted from
http://www.webupd8.org/2010/09/determine-dns-query-duration-quick.html
## by Larry Thiel 09/26/2010 No Rights Reserved
## modified by LT 10/04/2010
## modified by LT 06/18/2011 to rearrange display lines (could make 2nd line
optional)
function checkdns ()
{
local
t; less thing for me to worry about.
>
> Thank you for working through this with me.
>
>
>
> Keith Smith
>
> --- On Sat, 6/18/11, Lisa Kachold wrote:
>
> From: Lisa Kachold
> Subject: Re: Rackspace email & DNS
> To: "Main P
Lisa Kachold wrote:
From: Lisa Kachold
Subject: Re: Rackspace email & DNS
To: "Main PLUG discussion list"
Date: Saturday, June 18, 2011, 9:27 AM
Yes, that looks like a good deal at Rackspace.
Google Aps just changed their service levels.
There is also a mail relay optio
>
> Keith Smith
>
> --- On *Sat, 6/18/11, Lisa Kachold * wrote:
>
>
> From: Lisa Kachold
>
> Subject: Re: Rackspace email & DNS
> To: "Main PLUG discussion list"
> Date: Saturday, June 18, 2011, 8:05 AM
>
>
> It&
Lisa Kachold wrote:
From: Lisa Kachold
Subject: Re: Rackspace email & DNS
To: "Main PLUG discussion list"
Date: Saturday, June 18, 2011, 8:05 AM
It's really fun to run a mail server!
With a correctly configured postfix, exim or sendmail it's very fun.
Of course,
> From: Dan Lund
>
> Subject: Re: Rackspace email & DNS
> To: "Main PLUG discussion list"
> Date: Friday, June 17, 2011, 5:36 PM
>
>
> You get to that amount, and it's on the border of creating your own mail
> server.
> It's not terribly hard, i
sure would like hearing about it.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>>
>>
>> Keith Smith
>>
>> --- On Fri, 6/17/11, Bryan O'Neal
wrote:
>>
>> From: Bryan O'Neal
>> Subject: Re: Rackspace email & DNS
>
t need email.
>
> http://www.google.com/apps/intl/en/group/index.html
>
> If you know of a better plan I, sure would like hearing about it.
>
> Thanks!
>
> ----
>
> Keith Smith
>
> --- On Fri, 6/17/11, Bryan O'Neal
> wrote:
>
just need email.
http://www.google.com/apps/intl/en/group/index.html
If you know of a better plan I, sure would like hearing about it.
Thanks!
Keith Smith
--- On Fri, 6/17/11, Bryan O'Neal wrote:
From: Bryan O'Neal
Subject: Re: Rackspace email & DNS
T
wn
> that path and found it was going to take a lot of on going effort. I's not
> the cost of the server, it is the cost of time.
>
>
>
> Keith Smith
>
> --- On Fri, 6/17/11, Dan Lund wrote:
>
> From: Dan Lund
> Subject: Re: Rackspa
time.
Keith Smith
--- On Fri, 6/17/11, Dan Lund wrote:
From: Dan Lund
Subject: Re: Rackspace email & DNS
To: "Main PLUG discussion list"
Date: Friday, June 17, 2011, 5:36 PM
You get to that amount, and it's on the border of creating your own mail server.
It's not
*Thu, 6/16/11, Bryan O'Neal
> * wrote:
>
>
> From: Bryan O'Neal
> Subject: Re: Rackspace email & DNS
> To: "Main PLUG discussion list"
> Date: Thursday, June 16, 2011, 9:24 PM
>
>
> No direct experience but I am have only heard good things a
hanks!
Keith Smith
--- On Thu, 6/16/11, Bryan O'Neal wrote:
From: Bryan O'Neal
Subject: Re: Rackspace email & DNS
To: "Main PLUG discussion list"
Date: Thursday, June 16, 2011, 9:24 PM
No direct experience but I am have only heard good things about
rackspace.
No direct experience but I am have only heard good things about
rackspace. That said I let google do my email.
On 6/16/11, keith smith wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Anyone have experience with Rackspace email and their DNS hosting service ?
> They have 10gig mailboxes for $2/mo each. And D
Hi,
Anyone have experience with Rackspace email and their DNS hosting service ?
They have 10gig mailboxes for $2/mo each. And DNS can be added for $5.00/yr.
I'm testing their service now.
Thanks in advance.
Keith
Thank you all for your input on 3rd party DNS providers!
Keith Smith
--- On Sat, 5/28/11, Bryan O'Neal wrote:
From: Bryan O'Neal
Subject: Re: DNS provider
To: "Main PLUG discussion list"
Date: Saturday, May 28, 2011, 10:56 AM
I can put in
I can put in a second choice for dyndns. I really like that the offer
(shockingly) modern features that other dns providers are either
unable or unwilling to do. And I have never had a problem - unlike
with some other companies.
On 5/27/11, Eric Shubert wrote:
> On 05/25/2011 11:32 AM, ke
On 05/25/2011 11:32 AM, keith smith wrote:
Hi,
Any recommendations on a DNS provider that you would stake your
reputation, job, career, ETC on?
I'm looking for a DNS provider for a healthy online store. The provider
must be rock solid. I do not mind spending a few bucks.
T
Ultradns from ultradns.com (now neustar) is the best that I know of.
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 11:32, keith smith wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Any recommendations on a DNS provider that you would stake your reputation,
> job, career, ETC on?
>
> I'm looking for a DNS provider
Subject: Re: DNS provider
Same with www.zoneedit.com<http://www.zoneedit.com>. Been using them over a
decade, easy to use, never had an outage.
- joe
On May 25, 2011 11:35 AM, "Sean Roe" mailto:s...@azbiz.net>>
wrote:
> We have been very happy with http://www.dn
t; manage.
>
> Sean
>
> On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 11:32 AM, keith smith
wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Any recommendations on a DNS provider that you would stake your
reputation,
>> job, career, ETC on?
>>
>> I'm looking for a DNS provider for a
We have been very happy with http://www.dnsmadeeasy.com/ and
http://www.zerigo.com/ . Both highly reliable, redundant and easy to
manage.
Sean
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 11:32 AM, keith smith wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Any recommendations on a DNS provider that you would stake your reput
Hi,
Any recommendations on a DNS provider that you would stake your reputation,
job, career, ETC on?
I'm looking for a DNS provider for a healthy online store. The provider must
be rock solid. I do not mind spending a few bucks.
Thanks!
Keith
On 04/29/2011 01:45 PM, keith smith wrote:
Hi,
I have an old lap top on which I have installed CentOS 5.6 and Qmail
Toaster. I can send and receive email just fine. Qmail Toaster is
working just fine.
Now I want to configure Bind. Currently I am using my registrar's DNS. I
would like t
igure Bind. Currently I am using my registrar's DNS. I
> would like to run my own for the experience of it.
>
Well, you can have more than one nameserver!
>
> I only have one IP address on my Internet Account. It is my understanding
> I need 2 name servers. If that is tru
Keith wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have an old lap top on which I have installed CentOS 5.6 and Qmail
> Toaster. I can send and receive email just fine. Qmail Toaster is
> working just fine.
>
> Now I want to configure Bind. Currently I am using my registrar's DNS.
> I wou
Hi,
I have an old lap top on which I have installed CentOS 5.6 and Qmail Toaster.
I can send and receive email just fine. Qmail Toaster is working just fine.
Now I want to configure Bind. Currently I am using my registrar's DNS. I
would like to run my own for the experience of it.
I
cause I can insert firewalls, routers, etc... as/where
>>> desired to emulate probable scenarios. It's particularly helpful to
>>> emulate 4in6 or 6in4 connections when using external providers that do
>>> not provide sufficient IPv6 support.
>>>
>>
rs that do
not provide sufficient IPv6 support.
It's just easier to create a hostfile entry on the test client(s) than to
create or modify public DNS (sometimes that's not even possible). This
is particularly true when the service you're testing is already live and
you need to b
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 9:54 AM, Tom Ostlund wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I have my LAMP setup working just fine but I would like to setup dns so that
> I can fully test the sites that I am working on locally. This is where
> google fails me. I can see all kinds of stuff for Ubuntu
It's particularly helpful to emulate
4in6 or 6in4 connections when using external providers that do not provide
sufficient IPv6 support.
It's just easier to create a hostfile entry on the test client(s) than to
create or modify public DNS (sometimes that's not even possible). This i
e a hostfile entry on the test client(s) than to
> create or modify public DNS (sometimes that's not even possible). This is
> particularly true when the service you're testing is already live and you
> need to black-box test a component of an interconnected SOA system.
n6 or 6in4 connections when using external providers that do not provide
sufficient IPv6 support.
It's just easier to create a hostfile entry on the test client(s) than to
create or modify public DNS (sometimes that's not even possible). This is
particularly true when the service you'r
On 02/15/2011 10:42 AM, Joseph Sinclair wrote:
Tom,
Are you certain you need DNS and not, say, an entry in your hosts file
(/etc/hosts)?
Usually when testing I just add a hosts entry for the domain in question to the
test client boxes and/or servers and that resolves things without having
It would also give him some good learning on DNS...
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 10:42 AM, Joseph Sinclair
wrote:
> Tom,
> Are you certain you need DNS and not, say, an entry in your hosts file
> (/etc/hosts)?
> Usually when testing I just add a hosts entry for the domain in question to
Tom,
Are you certain you need DNS and not, say, an entry in your hosts file
(/etc/hosts)?
Usually when testing I just add a hosts entry for the domain in question to the
test client boxes and/or servers and that resolves things without having to
mess with DNS.
Tom Ostlund wrote:
> Hello
p working just fine but I would like to setup dns so that
> > I can fully test the sites that I am working on locally. This is where
> > google fails me. I can see all kinds of stuff for Ubuntu Server but not
> > really anything for Ubuntu Desktop.
> >
> > Can anyo
results are still valid.
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 9:54 AM, Tom Ostlund wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I have my LAMP setup working just fine but I would like to setup dns so that
> I can fully test the sites that I am working on locally. This is where
> google fails me. I can see all kinds of s
Hello All,
I have my LAMP setup working just fine but I would like to setup dns so
that I can fully test the sites that I am working on locally. This is
where google fails me. I can see all kinds of stuff for Ubuntu Server
but not really anything for Ubuntu Desktop.
Can anyone send me a link
At DefCon 18, a new SOHO router exploit (while alive and well in the field
for some time) has been fully showcased: DNS rebinding Attacks:
Heffner's presentation PDF: http://thecyberjungle.com/cc/*defcon*18/*DEFCON*
-18-Heffner-*Routers*.pdf
*
This neat trick does essentially the same thing
ostly
because I enjoy knowing that Micro$oft has a tendency to do whatever they
want regardless.
-Mike
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 12:23 PM, Dazed_75 wrote:
> I wondered what people here might think about this idea about reputation
> considerations in a DNS
>
> http://www.extreme
I wondered what people here might think about this idea about reputation
considerations in a DNS
http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,2845,2367566,00.asp
http://www.circleid.com/posts/20100728_taking_back_the_dns/
It seems a very interesting idea full of promise as well as potential
abuse. I
Seems we had an bit of an issue with the DNS server that was running the
show for the PLUG servers.
This problem occurred about a week ago and caused the DNS for both
servers to be pointed at their old locations.
This would account for the seemingly random complaints with various
people not
;> Subject: Re: Installfest this Saturday - PLUG website dead?
>>
>> Your browser should be giving you an address not found message. If bing
>> is factoring into it, then your dns is being hijacked, or you have some
>> sort of plugin that is redirecting your results.
>
Yes, and on all of the forums, since there were so many problems with those
two providers' private DNS, which was being used to provide traffic shaping
in the way of limiting services by failures in capacity planning,
technically saavy individuals started to use 4.4.4.4 and other alternativ
On Sat, 28 Nov 2009, Bob Elzer wrote:
> You do know that you can use any DNS server you want to, right ?
two caveat's here:
1. a common policy to avoid load problems on
nameservers is to limit relies to non-customer IP's to only
those domains for which one is auth
r any of a bunch of others for free.
>>
>> Is there a particular reason you need to use the verizon DNS servers ?
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> *From:* plug-discuss-boun...@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us [mailto:
>> plug-discuss-bou
's the case, you really don't need to.
>
> You can use OpenDNS, or DynDNS, or any of a bunch of others for free.
>
> Is there a particular reason you need to use the verizon DNS servers ?
>
>
>
> --
> *From:* plug-discuss-b
What are you trying to do ?
I get the impression you are trying to do something sneaky.
If that's the case, you really don't need to.
You can use OpenDNS, or DynDNS, or any of a bunch of others for free.
Is there a particular reason you need to use the verizon D
g on about not using them if you are not authorized to do
> > so. What
> > > are they talking about? I thought they were in the public domain.
> > >
> >
> > What led you to believe that?
> >
> > They are intended for use solely
ere in the public domain.
> >
>
> What led you to believe that?
>
> They are intended for use solely by their customers. Why would/should
> they provide DNS resolver services for the whole world?
>
> Then again, if they want to limit usage of th
Say you have domain foobar.org and a mailserver mail.foobar.org, if you add
an MX entry to foobar.org, the MX will say "yo, relay this mail to
mail.foobar.org"
(top posting due to laziness)
mike havens wrote:
>
> yeah... I kinda thought that ns =name server but what about mx?
>
--
Ryan Rix
sing them if you are not authorized to do so. What
> > are they talking about? I thought they were in the public domain.
> >
>
> What led you to believe that?
>
> They are intended for use solely by their customers. Why would/should
> they provide DNS resolver services fo
nded for use solely by their customers. Why would/should
they provide DNS resolver services for the whole world?
Then again, if they want to limit usage of their resolvers to their
customers, it seems reasonable that they take whatever measures are
necessary to enforce that limitation.
--
-
ote:
> > You do know that you can use any DNS server you want to, right ?
> >
> > I use openDNS, it's free and I seem to have less problems then I ever had
> > with qwest.
> >
> > http://www.opendns.com/start/ Basic works just fine.
> > <http://
On 11/28/09, Bob Elzer wrote:
> You do know that you can use any DNS server you want to, right ?
>
> I use openDNS, it's free and I seem to have less problems then I ever had
> with qwest.
>
> http://www.opendns.com/start/ Basic works just fine.
> <htt
You do know that you can use any DNS server you want to, right ?
I use openDNS, it's free and I seem to have less problems then I ever had
with qwest.
http://www.opendns.com/start/ Basic works just fine.
<http://www.opendns.com/>
https://store.opendns.com/setup/operatingsy
Monroe wrote:
>> >>
>> >> dns1.uson.mx
>> >> sancarlos.noc.uson.mx
>> >> 148.225.1.9
>> >> 148.225.2.9
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Sent from my blackberry
>> >>
>> >> -Original Message-
>
8.225.2.9
> >>
> >>
> >> Sent from my blackberry
> >>
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: mike havens
> >> Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 20:47:58
> >> To: Main PLUG discussion list
> >> Subject: DNS
> >>
gt;
> On 11/27/09, Dorian Monroe wrote:
>>
>> dns1.uson.mx
>> sancarlos.noc.uson.mx
>> 148.225.1.9
>> 148.225.2.9
>>
>>
>> Sent from my blackberry
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: mike haven
9
>
>
> Sent from my blackberry
>
> -Original Message-
> From: mike havens
> Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 20:47:58
> To: Main PLUG discussion list
> Subject: DNS
>
> ---
> PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lis
dns1.uson.mx
sancarlos.noc.uson.mx
148.225.1.9
148.225.2.9
Sent from my blackberry
-Original Message-
From: mike havens
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 20:47:58
To: Main PLUG discussion list
Subject: DNS
---
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG
I'm trying to find the DNS in Nogales, Mexico. I stuck my terms into
Google and came up with the following web page:
http://www.robtex.com/dns/nogales.uson.mx.html My belief is that the IP
addresses under the heading IP are the DNS settings. Am I correct?
--
:-)
On Nov 4, 2009, at 5:02 PM, Joshua Zeidner wrote:
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 4:00 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:
Ryan Rix wrote:
Ryan Rix wrote:
Eric Shubert wrote:
Please correct me if I'm wrong, but it appears to me that OpenDNS
provides only DNS Resolver (aka recursive, caching) servic
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 4:00 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:
> Ryan Rix wrote:
>> Ryan Rix wrote:
>>
>>> Eric Shubert wrote:
>>>
>>>> Please correct me if I'm wrong, but it appears to me that OpenDNS
>>>> provides only DNS Resolver (aka recurs
Ryan Rix wrote:
> Ryan Rix wrote:
>
>> Eric Shubert wrote:
>>
>>> Please correct me if I'm wrong, but it appears to me that OpenDNS
>>> provides only DNS Resolver (aka recursive, caching) services. I believe
>>> that Ryan's looking for A
Ryan Rix wrote:
> Eric Shubert wrote:
>
>> Please correct me if I'm wrong, but it appears to me that OpenDNS
>> provides only DNS Resolver (aka recursive, caching) services. I believe
>> that Ryan's looking for Authoritative DNS service, which I don't
Eric Shubert wrote:
> Please correct me if I'm wrong, but it appears to me that OpenDNS
> provides only DNS Resolver (aka recursive, caching) services. I believe
> that Ryan's looking for Authoritative DNS service, which I don't see
> OpenDNS providing. Am I missing so
Please correct me if I'm wrong, but it appears to me that OpenDNS
provides only DNS Resolver (aka recursive, caching) services. I believe
that Ryan's looking for Authoritative DNS service, which I don't see
OpenDNS providing. Am I missing something here?
Lisa Kachold wrote:
&g
I agree. OpenDNS is fast, inexpensive, and reliable.
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 1:27 PM, Lisa Kachold wrote:
> OpenDNS
>
>
>
--
Donn
There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
-- Dave Barry
---
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-dis
name, not a .com
> or anything like that, so I registered rix.si via the domain registrar COBIT
> in Slovenia, since that's apparently the ONLY .si domain registrar with an
> English site.
>
> So I did it, whew, 25$ a year. And then they told me they didn't host DNS.
>
.si via the domain registrar
> COBIT
> in Slovenia, since that's apparently the ONLY .si domain registrar with an
> English site.
>
> So I did it, whew, 25$ a year. And then they told me they didn't host DNS.
>
> Now, I'm cheap. :) My friend who hosts my irssi scre
Y .si domain registrar with an
English site.
So I did it, whew, 25$ a year. And then they told me they didn't host DNS.
Now, I'm cheap. :) My friend who hosts my irssi screen session lovingly
offered up a spot on his virtual server for my site, which is basically
awesome because I have shel
5#53(204.13.248.75)
> ;; WHEN: Mon Jul 13 18:48:38 2009
> ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 105
>
> I do get a SOA section for neustar.biz - which would be probably where
> this traffic is originating. But it's A record is not resolving for
> some reason, probably never entered in the domai
What logs are you looking at ? Is this Apache I assume ?
The IP address of the incoming connection should be in the log files
/var/log/httpd/access_log (for centos)
Is he looking at a summarized log file maybe like webalizer ? I believe that
converts the ip's to their dns names.
So lo
Perhaps http://www.javascriptkit.com/howto/htaccess14.shtml would be a
good read. You can set the .htaccess to generate a 404 or ... Anyway
I think the article probably has a good explination of what's going
on. Your friend needs a new log parser or needs to add more columns to
his view the apache
nkage.
>
> Something else: I didn't know this, but people who mess around with
> homebrew explosives call themselves "alchemists", so there's obviously
> more of a cross-linked interest THERE than with aromatherapy.
>
> I've run "whois" searches on &
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 6:32 PM, James
Finstrom wrote:
> The referer is not official it is just an http header so most likely
> someone spoofing the header
Well then they're spoofing it 2000+ times. A google search on:
"alchemistsrroom.us"
...shows lots of hits and in some cases site referrals
The referer is not official it is just an http header so most likely
someone spoofing the header
On 7/13/09, Jim March <1.jim.ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I have a friend who runs a website. Every night he looks at the logs
> and checks to see where people are linking in from - usually
>
Folks,
I have a friend who runs a website. Every night he looks at the logs
and checks to see where people are linking in from - usually
discussion forums.
He's got a regular trickle of incoming from a website that doesn't
seem to exist:
http://www.alchemistsrroom.us
Drop one "r" from "rroom"
From: mike havens
> On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 12:38 AM, Kurt Granroth:
>> On 5/21/09 6:23 AM, Lyle Tuttle wrote:
>>> A friend has Cox internet service, but sends so many
>>> emails they want her to pay for a business connection
Er. Is she running a mailing list or something? This is odd, as I
was
to pay for a business connection - way too much $.
> > Could she connect to internet, then and send / receive email via these
> > servers?
>
> No. As mentioned earlier, DNS servers are all about translating easy to
> remember domain names to harder to remember IP addresses. No
oned earlier, DNS servers are all about translating easy to
remember domain names to harder to remember IP addresses. Nothing more.
As far as your friend goes, presumably she is sending her email through
Cox? I can't see how they would care or even know about her email
traffic otherwise
I used to use them in a pinch when I needed internet to fix my internal DNS
On 5/20/09, Kurt Granroth wrote:
> On 5/19/09 3:54 AM, mike havens wrote:
>> I want to find out all that I can about a certain Domain Name Server.
>> Unfortunately, I do not have linux on my computer so
On 5/20/09 10:07 PM, mike havens wrote:
> Could I go out and purchase a modem, hook it up to a coax connected to
> the cable system (which is being paid for), and then have free internet
No. DNS is simply a way of associating (harder to remember) IP
addresses with (easier to remember)
connection for Internet service and
add your modem to the allowed list. Free DNS servers does not equal
free Internet.
Sent from my iPhone
On May 20, 2009, at 10:07 PM, mike havens
<<mailto:bmi...@gmail.com>bmi...@gmail.com> wrote:
Could I go out and purchase a modem, hook it
what do they do to hack a modem?
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 1:26 AM, Jon M. Hanson wrote:
> No. Cox has to provision your connection for Internet service and add your
> modem to the allowed list. Free DNS servers does not equal free Internet.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On May 20,
No. Cox has to provision your connection for Internet service and add
your modem to the allowed list. Free DNS servers does not equal free
Internet.
Sent from my iPhone
On May 20, 2009, at 10:07 PM, mike havens wrote:
Could I go out and purchase a modem, hook it up to a coax connected
1 - 100 of 169 matches
Mail list logo
