Hi Paolo,
thank you very much for your prompt reply. My comments are also inline.
On 28 May 2014, at 17:39, Paolo Lucente pa...@pmacct.net wrote:
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 07:47:45AM +, Thomas King wrote:
- From the documentation I reasoned that pmacct/nfacct is able to handle
IPFIX
Hi Pierre-Yves,
thanks for your suggestions.
On 28 May 2014, at 18:24, Pierre-Yves Maunier pymaunier+li...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-05-28 9:47 GMT+02:00 Thomas King thomas.k...@de-cix.net:
- From the documentation I reasoned that pmacct/nfacct is able to handle
IPFIX sampling. I use IPFIX
Hi Thomas,
Comments in-line:
On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 02:48:33PM +, Thomas King wrote:
We double checked the IPFIX data coming from our router. The sampling rate is
contained in the data. It comes via a data record (template id=256) and the
relevant fields are named
Hi Paolo,
On Tue, 3 Jun 2014, Paolo Lucente wrote:
What you describe for timestamps seems a good match for NetFlow, ie.
cast packets into flows and handle these via a flow-aware cache (so
active/passive expiration timers, max lifetime, etc.). All described is
already part of the nfprobe
