For those with confidence in PmWiki but unhappy with its syntax. Or those out
of breath configuring it. Refer to http://www.pmwiki.org/wiki/W7/Slender A
proposal open for discussion. /jm
_
Fixing up the home? Live Search can help.
ht
On 1/18/07, J. Meijer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> For those with confidence in PmWiki but unhappy with its syntax.
> Or those out of breath configuring it.
>
> Refer to http://www.pmwiki.org/wiki/W7/Slender
>
> A proposal open for discussion.
>
A *really* more effective way to support your pr
> On 1/18/07, J. Meijer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > For those with confidence in PmWiki but unhappy with its syntax.
> > Or those out of breath configuring it.
> >
> > Refer to http://www.pmwiki.org/wiki/W7/Slender
> >
> > A proposal open for discussion.
> >
>
> A *really* more effect
J. Meijer wrote:
>
>> On 1/18/07, J. Meijer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> For those with confidence in PmWiki but unhappy with its syntax.
>>> Or those out of breath configuring it.
>>>
>>> Refer to http://www.pmwiki.org/wiki/W7/Slender
>>>
>>> A proposal open for discussion.
>>>
>>>
On 1/18/07, J. Meijer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For those with confidence in PmWiki but unhappy with its syntax.
> Or those out of breath configuring it.
>
> Refer to http://www.pmwiki.org/wiki/W7/Slender
>
> A proposal open for discussion.
Well, I would think that PmWiki Philosophy #3 applies
On 1/18/07, J. Meijer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For those with confidence in PmWiki but unhappy with its syntax.
> Or those out of breath configuring it.
>
> Refer to http://www.pmwiki.org/wiki/W7/Slender
>
> A proposal open for discussion.
I'm glad to see the proposal, but I have a few comment
On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 02:59:19PM -0600, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
> "Who uses [[<<]] and why?": [...] If we get
> rid of [[<<]], we almost certainly need something to replace it.
Just to avoid a panic:
Anytime I say something like "if we get rid of X in favor of Y",
I don't mean that we wi
Re [[<<]]
FWIW I use:
(:block-divider:) and (:block-spacer:) directives
Markup("block-divider", "fulltext", "/^\\(:block-divider:\\)/", "class='block-divider'>");
Markup("block-spacer", "fulltext", "/^\\(:block-spacer:\\)/", "style='height:8px;overflow:hidden;' class='block-divider'> ");
wh
On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 04:17:07PM -0500, Henrik wrote:
>Re [[<<]]
>
>FWIW I use:
>
>(:block-divider:) and (:block-spacer:) directives
I hadn't really thought about using directives, but that's
definitely a possibility.
The [[<<]] markup is left over from when we didn't have a
way
On Thu, 18 Jan 2007, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 04:17:07PM -0500, Henrik wrote:
Re [[<<]]
FWIW I use:
(:block-divider:) and (:block-spacer:) directives
I hadn't really thought about using directives, but that's
definitely a possibility.
I was going to sugge
On Thu, 18 Jan 2007, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
"Text indented with spaces no longer generates preformatted text.": I've
already remarked that it will be easy to disable this sometime in
2.2.0-beta, I just haven't had a chance to implement it yet. I'm not
entirely against having leading-spaces
Patrick R. Michaud said...
>
> But I think that nowadays the only time that [[<<]] is used
> is to skip below any floating elements. Perhaps a wikistyle
> would serve the same purpose-- i.e. %clear% would cause the
> current block to appear below any floating content?
>
> %rfloat% Attach:fl
On Thu, 18 Jan 2007, marc wrote:
Patrick R. Michaud said...
But I think that nowadays the only time that [[<<]] is used
is to skip below any floating elements. Perhaps a wikistyle
would serve the same purpose-- i.e. %clear% would cause the
current block to appear below any floating content?
less' to get:
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 14:59:19 -0600
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [pmwiki-users] Announce: Slender, pmwiki-based wiki making a
> fresh start
>
> On 1/18/07, J. Meijer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > For those with confidence in Pm
On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 01:32:12AM +, J. Meijer wrote:
> ! The opportunity
>
> I feel there is a place for a a single *prominent* second syntax that
> departs significantly from the current. It will help balance PmWiki
> and also make it *unique*. With users excited about this (but not
> enti
On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 11:27:00PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Jan 2007, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
>
> >On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 04:17:07PM -0500, Henrik wrote:
> >> Re [[<<]]
> >>
> >> FWIW I use:
> >>
> >> (:block-divider:) and (:block-spacer:) directives
> >
> >I hadn't re
On Fri, Jan 19, 2007 at 12:52:46AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Jan 2007, marc wrote:
> >Patrick R. Michaud said...
> >>
> >>But I think that nowadays the only time that [[<<]] is used
> >>is to skip below any floating elements. Perhaps a wikistyle
> >>would serve the same purpose-
17 matches
Mail list logo
