Hello POEple.
http://poe.perl.org/?POE_RFCs/Revise_call mentions adding a
POE::Session->call() method, in part of the revision of call. This new
session method is intended to deny cross-session calls, which as a side
effect allows extended optimization of call() bypassing garbage
collec
On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 11:57:26PM -0500, sungo wrote:
> On (02/04 04:14), Rocco Caputo wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the reply. http://poe.perl.org/?POE_RFCs/Test_Reforms has
> > been harshly (and incompletely, but it's like 03:00 here) revised based
For perspective:
The goal of updating POE's test
On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 09:38:24PM -0500, sungo wrote:
>
> We of the mysterious irc have been pondering a 1.0 release of poe for a
> while. Its good for marketing if nothing else. There's even a wiki page
> (http://poe.perl.org/?V1.0-todos) documenting our thoughts on
> requirements.
>
> Well, we
On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 09:13:51PM -0800, Tim Wood wrote:
> At 08:47 PM 02/06/04, Scott Beck wrote:
>
>
> >To me a version number is nothing more than a loose representation of
> >where the author thinks the code is in terms of stability and the only
> >rule for versions is it must be changed fro
