"Niall Pemberton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>It seems to me that the org.apache.poi.util.LittleEndian class doesn't cater
>the for situation for ClassID as it returns numbers and not byte[] - so if
>you use it's methods you still have to convert to a byte[] after.
>
>I think the following version of Cl
Nicola Ken Barozzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Here is where everyone stopped thinking and ranting began.
>
>Just a few notes:
>...
>... [http://jakarta.apache.org/site/source.html]
Ken, thanks for pointing us to that page! That was really helpful!
Best regards
Rainer Klute
Rainer Klute wrote:
> Hi POI folks,
Here is where everyone stopped thinking and ranting began.
Just a few notes:
1. [http://jakarta.apache.org/site/source.html]
Simple patches to fix bugs can be committed then reviewed.
NKB says: "If Rainer saw that Andy committed bugged code, he could hav
Apologies if this has been sorted, I'm not actually on the POI mailing
list - just getting into it.
It seems to me that the org.apache.poi.util.LittleEndian class doesn't cater
the for situation for ClassID as it returns numbers and not byte[] - so if
you use it's methods you still have to conver
>Thanks. This may be enough for me to fix the method. I'll investigate it fur
ther. Give me a few
>days as I'm working on something else at this very moment. (days not months).
I just fixed it. Took me a few hours, though.
Best regards
Rainer Klute
Rainer Klute I
> No, I did not mean this because it really does not help you and
> it is in a different context.
>
> I meant this one:
>
> Following the header is the section list. This is an array of
> pairs each consisting of a section format ID and an offset.
> This array has as many pairs of ClassID and
"Ryan Ackley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I just committed changes to the ClassID class that allow it to compile. I
>wasn't sure of the original intention of the author but I think I got it. My
>wife is yelling at me as I write this because we are going out of town.
>Could someone please test it f
All,
I just committed changes to the ClassID class that allow it to compile. I
wasn't sure of the original intention of the author but I think I got it. My
wife is yelling at me as I write this because we are going out of town.
Could someone please test it for me? I will be gone until next Monday
>>You did, I did it to collaborate in finishing the work. Because no one under
stands this
>>underdocumented piece, no one could work on it but you. Catch-22.
>>
>>If I kept the code locally, no one could help finish this right? right.
No. There is *never* any reason to check in broken code. I
Sorry guys this got munched by my ISPs defective email server.
>>>"Andrew C. Oliver" apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>/>>This isn't really about that though is it, its your wounded pride. If you
>don't want/
>/>>to have to deal with others messing with your code, by all means don't
>opensource
>
>
>Subject: Re: [VOTE] HPSF priorities
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N
>
>
>
>>Hi Rainer,
>>
>>
&
/At the moment since I couldn't figure out what the method should do enough to rewrite
it to the
LittleEndian classes, etc, I'm throwing a runtime exception. If you can read that,
match it
up to the documentation and we can figure out what it does, we should be able to
reimplement it!
I'm ce
>Is it not possible to work with Andy to get this class fixed? I don't know
>the details but it doesn't sound like there's a much really stopping this
>>from happening. If you can work with us to help fix this I'm sure we can
>have it done relatively quickly. Ryan's offered to help and I'm will
>>> So please cast your votes on the priorities outlined above!
>>> Thanks!
>>
>>-1 - a more reasonable alternative: quit sulking and help me understand
>>http://jakarta.apache.org/poi/javadocs/javasrc/org/apache/poi/hpsf/ClassID
_java.html#ClassID
>>(scroll to the method clearly marked REWRITE M
> Read this method before you vote! and if someone other than rainer (who
donen't have
time)
> wants to give me a hand in figuring that method out, that would be
appreciated and
probably
> make this whole argument moot!
Andy, I am willing to help. I haven't been following this thread, what e
"Andrew C. Oliver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>This isn't really about that though is it, its your wounded pride. If you don't want
>to have to deal with others messing with your code, by all means don't opensource it.
This is not true. I don't mind others changing "my" code. Remember, it is
no
> Hi POI folks,
>
Hi.
> after a rather long time-out I am back to the project and willing
> to start working again. However, before I continue with HPSF
> development I'd like your votes on what to do first and what to
> do later.
The prioritization, if you like our opinion is fine, but it
Hi POI folks,
after a rather long time-out I am back to the project and willing
to start working again. However, before I continue with HPSF
development I'd like your votes on what to do first and what to
do later.
The current situation is intolerable because HPSF is simply
dysfunctional. In
18 matches
Mail list logo
