PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, April 28, 2002 10:52 PM
Subject: Re: Numeric Types in org.apache.poi.hpsf.littleendian
...
What is appropriate is to ask Batik to put the WMF
rasterizing classes into the Commons. It'd be a small, modular
component
useful
in applications that need
) toil.
- Drew
Quoting Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
- Original Message -
From: Drew Varner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, April 28, 2002 10:52 PM
Subject: Re: Numeric Types in org.apache.poi.hpsf.littleendian
Andrew C. Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dude. Thats totally awesome. You may find you need to create a hacked
copy of Batik to prevent imports of other Batik code tied to AWT.
(Batik is the famous Cocoon awt tie problem ;-) ).
Consider whether this code is an appropriate addition to HPSF
Andrew C. Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+/- - What I think would be optimal is having a windows specific image
library under POI in its own package. It could be tied to awt until
someone scratches the itch.
Anyhow, don't tie HPSF/HDF/HSSF/POIFS to AWT and my objections are
satisfied. Even if
From: Avik Sengupta [EMAIL PROTECTED]
re dynamic classloading and headless behaviour ...
AFAIK, the call to load X (native) libraries happen at link time, which in
the
java world is basically on classloading. So you CAN get around X loading
be
ensuring that class loading of ANY awt class
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Instead of using AWT, I would like to see us make the classes ourselves.
What are the AWT classes-methods we need?
If they are 200, I agree that AWT is difficult to get around with, but if
they're 20...
Better try to get around the AWT dependencies!
From: Andrew C. Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Right, but this is a windows-specific binary format. Not an XML tag
language. The API for the binary format is the part I think that is
POI. XML tag lanugages for it...well thats not POI.
To be honest I'm +1 in keeping it in POI.
It's just that I'm
BTW, I'm starting to think that we could do a jar for each package...
+1, but *not yet*
(Basically lets wait till the hangover from the last major build
restructuring is done before we go on another benderPlus formulas
are now moving at lightning speed and I don't want to slow it
Hey Folks,
I hacked out some code to extract a WMF file from the byte array returned by
getThumbnail()
I saved the WMF file to disk and imported it into Word so I think I am good. I
don't know that I can convert WMF to something meaningful in Java though.
Some of the parameters in the
From: Drew Varner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hey Folks,
I hacked out some code to extract a WMF file from the byte array returned
by
getThumbnail()
I saved the WMF file to disk and imported it into Word so I think I am
good. I
don't know that I can convert WMF to something meaningful in Java
Ok, so I spoke too early.
Here are other other links :-)
http://piet.jonas.com/
http://www.blackdirt.com/graphics/svg/
http://www.physik.uni-greifswald.de/~jonas/WMFViewer/WMF2JMF.html
http://lsewww.epfl.ch/wiesmann/jqd/
http://www.geocities.com/marcoschmidt.geo/java-image-coding.html
At some point we need to combine org.apache.poi.util.LittleEndian and
org.apache.poi.hspsf.littleendian to one general purpose thing.
Eventually this should migrate to Jakarta commons. I'll look around
for docs on WMF. you might check chicago.sourceforge.net.
Drew Varner wrote:
Hey Folks,
Dude. Thats totally awesome. You may find you need to create a hacked
copy of Batik to prevent imports of other Batik code tied to AWT.
(Batik is the famous Cocoon awt tie problem ;-) ).
Consider whether this code is an appropriate addition to HPSF or if it
might be a component in and of
- Original Message -
From: Drew Varner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, April 28, 2002 10:52 PM
Subject: Re: Numeric Types in org.apache.poi.hpsf.littleendian
...
What is appropriate is to ask Batik to put the WMF
rasterizing classes into the Commons. It'd
I am taking up too much mailbox space with my philosophy here, so I'll take it
offline for anyone interested in the discussion. The truth is it isn't a big
deal. Sorry folks =-)
Quoting Andrew C. Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
rant
Now, passing around a WMF image as a byte[] is really useless.
I agree. Should be our (my) toil.
- Drew
Quoting Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
- Original Message -
From: Drew Varner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, April 28, 2002 10:52 PM
Subject: Re: Numeric Types in org.apache.poi.hpsf.littleendian
]:
- Original Message -
From: Drew Varner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, April 28, 2002 10:52 PM
Subject: Re: Numeric Types in org.apache.poi.hpsf.littleendian
...
What is appropriate is to ask Batik to put the WMF
rasterizing classes
17 matches
Mail list logo
