Hi,
after upgrading from 4.2 to snapshot (packages ~ Nov 3) Gnumeric
doesn't display graphs anymore. They are visible
in the graph's property editor but not in the sheet
itself. Anyone else having same problems?
How to repeat:
create a sheet with cells, for example:
1 10
2 11
3 12
Select the
On 2007/11/17 13:54, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> - I am not too happy about this lot:
>
>char comm[4096];
> snprintf(comm,4096,"%s %s %s",MOVEIT,p->mailfile,config->virusdirbase);
> if(system(comm)) do_log(LOG_CRIT,"ERR: move");
> snprintf(comm,4096,"%s %s/p3scan.*",CHMODCMD,co
On Sat 2007.11.17 at 20:40 +0800, Bibby wrote:
> Hi, all.
>
> I use OpenBSD 4.2 -release, when i install lam-6.5.9p0.tgz from binary
> package, i got this message:
>
> # pkg_add lam
> lam-6.5.9p0:
> complete
>
> Unknown manpage type /usr/local/man/man3/libmpi.3
> Unknown manpage type /usr/local/
On 2007-11-17 22:08 +0530, Siju George wrote:
> You don't consider the least thing you can do ( i.e to thank the
> authors ) a worth while effort because you have the option to pirate
I'm just saying that most of the good pieces of FOSS are generic
clone software, not software with a "face" and a
On 2007-11-17 12:03 -0500, Jason Dixon wrote:
> I don't think you really care though. You sound like a very bitter
> person.
I tend to like bitter. And stout and other varieties too.
--
Tuomo
On Nov 17, 2007 10:38 PM, Nikolay Sturm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Siju George [2007-11-17]:
> > If OpenBSD changed its license and put in restrictions you would have
> > no other way but to distribute the old one.
> >
> > See it is not the OpenBSD people who tarnishes you. It is your own
> >
Please immediately take this to your own list, instead of spamming
this list further.
> On 2007-11-17 22:10 +0530, Siju George wrote:
> > See it is not the OpenBSD people who tarnishes you.
> > It is your own license restrictions that are working against you.
>
> The extra terms in the license ar
On 2007-11-17 22:10 +0530, Siju George wrote:
> See it is not the OpenBSD people who tarnishes you.
> It is your own license restrictions that are working against you.
The extra terms in the license are there for a reason, you know.
Distros far bigger than OpenBSD fucking with you by distributing
* Siju George [2007-11-17]:
> If OpenBSD changed its license and put in restrictions you would have
> no other way but to distribute the old one.
>
> See it is not the OpenBSD people who tarnishes you. It is your own
> license restrictions that are working against you.
Could you move this stupid
On Nov 17, 2007, at 11:40 AM, "Siju George" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Nov 16, 2007 11:37 PM, Tuomo Valkonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm sure OpenBSD would like very much for me to distribute some
ancient and significantly modified release as the latest. Except,
of course, I don't have
On Nov 17, 2007 9:54 PM, Tuomo Valkonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2007-11-17 21:38 +0530, Siju George wrote:
> > Come on Tuomo.
> > Don't get so upset of not being paid back for your efforts in some way
> > or the other.
>
> I don't expect to get paid back, but I'd rather people not fuck with
On Nov 16, 2007 11:37 PM, Tuomo Valkonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm sure OpenBSD would like very much for me to distribute some
> ancient and significantly modified release as the latest. Except,
> of course, I don't have the resources for such to have much of an
> effect, unlike The Party, i
On 2007-11-17 21:38 +0530, Siju George wrote:
> Come on Tuomo.
> Don't get so upset of not being paid back for your efforts in some way
> or the other.
I don't expect to get paid back, but I'd rather people not fuck with
me after all my efforts, as the distros do.
> Let me ask you this.
> How man
On Nov 16, 2007 11:31 PM, Tuomo Valkonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2007-11-16, Craig Brozefsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Yah, sucks to write free software, perhaps you should just stop.
>
> Indeed, Ion3 is my final gift to the FOSS herd, that it can never
> hope to repay. After that any
On 2007/11/17 13:54, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> - changes mkdir/chmod for an install in MESSAGE
sorry, this explanation is not too clear :)
Rather than writing
mkdir /var/run/foo
chmod ...
we can just do
install -d /var/run/foo -o ...
The attached version:
- changes mkdir/chmod for an install in MESSAGE
- adds notes about permissions on /dev/pf
- calls setgid(), so /dev/pf only needs 640 not 644
(the code already assumes that username == groupname so
I didn't add a new config parameter)
Remaining problems:
- permissions o
Hi, all.
I use OpenBSD 4.2 -release, when i install lam-6.5.9p0.tgz from binary
package, i got this message:
# pkg_add lam
lam-6.5.9p0:
complete
Unknown manpage type /usr/local/man/man3/libmpi.3
Unknown manpage type /usr/local/man/man7/MPI.7
Unknown manpage type /usr/local/man/man7/mpi.7
Is it
On 2007/11/17 13:30, Soner Tari wrote:
> But I am not happy with the !!LOCALBASE!! changes in the patch files.
> Because when I make update-patches, they are replaced with '/usr/local',
At least with the changes done in pre-configure rather than post-patch,
we can 'make clean patch', merge as need
On Fri, 2007-11-16 at 17:34 -0500, Okan Demirmen wrote:
> On Fri 2007.11.16 at 17:27 -0500, Okan Demirmen wrote:
> > i think the one thing i'd ask is replacing the hardcoded /usr/local bits
> > in the patches with !!LOCALBASE!! and do something like the following in
> > pre-configure:
> > perl
19 matches
Mail list logo
