On Fri, 2007-11-16 at 17:34 -0500, Okan Demirmen wrote:
On Fri 2007.11.16 at 17:27 -0500, Okan Demirmen wrote:
i think the one thing i'd ask is replacing the hardcoded /usr/local bits
in the patches with !!LOCALBASE!! and do something like the following in
pre-configure:
perl -pi -e
On 2007/11/17 13:30, Soner Tari wrote:
But I am not happy with the !!LOCALBASE!! changes in the patch files.
Because when I make update-patches, they are replaced with '/usr/local',
At least with the changes done in pre-configure rather than post-patch,
we can 'make clean patch', merge as
Hi, all.
I use OpenBSD 4.2 -release, when i install lam-6.5.9p0.tgz from binary
package, i got this message:
# pkg_add lam
lam-6.5.9p0:
complete
Unknown manpage type /usr/local/man/man3/libmpi.3
Unknown manpage type /usr/local/man/man7/MPI.7
Unknown manpage type /usr/local/man/man7/mpi.7
Is it
The attached version:
- changes mkdir/chmod for an install in MESSAGE
- adds notes about permissions on /dev/pf
- calls setgid(), so /dev/pf only needs 640 not 644
(the code already assumes that username == groupname so
I didn't add a new config parameter)
Remaining problems:
- permissions
On 2007/11/17 13:54, Stuart Henderson wrote:
- changes mkdir/chmod for an install in MESSAGE
sorry, this explanation is not too clear :)
Rather than writing
mkdir /var/run/foo
chmod ...
we can just do
install -d /var/run/foo -o ...
On Nov 16, 2007 11:31 PM, Tuomo Valkonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2007-11-16, Craig Brozefsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yah, sucks to write free software, perhaps you should just stop.
Indeed, Ion3 is my final gift to the FOSS herd, that it can never
hope to repay. After that any software
On 2007-11-17 21:38 +0530, Siju George wrote:
Come on Tuomo.
Don't get so upset of not being paid back for your efforts in some way
or the other.
I don't expect to get paid back, but I'd rather people not fuck with
me after all my efforts, as the distros do.
Let me ask you this.
How many
On Nov 16, 2007 11:37 PM, Tuomo Valkonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm sure OpenBSD would like very much for me to distribute some
ancient and significantly modified release as the latest. Except,
of course, I don't have the resources for such to have much of an
effect, unlike The Party, i.e.
On Nov 17, 2007 9:54 PM, Tuomo Valkonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2007-11-17 21:38 +0530, Siju George wrote:
Come on Tuomo.
Don't get so upset of not being paid back for your efforts in some way
or the other.
I don't expect to get paid back, but I'd rather people not fuck with
me after
On Nov 17, 2007, at 11:40 AM, Siju George [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Nov 16, 2007 11:37 PM, Tuomo Valkonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm sure OpenBSD would like very much for me to distribute some
ancient and significantly modified release as the latest. Except,
of course, I don't have the
* Siju George [2007-11-17]:
If OpenBSD changed its license and put in restrictions you would have
no other way but to distribute the old one.
See it is not the OpenBSD people who tarnishes you. It is your own
license restrictions that are working against you.
Could you move this stupid
On 2007-11-17 22:10 +0530, Siju George wrote:
See it is not the OpenBSD people who tarnishes you.
It is your own license restrictions that are working against you.
The extra terms in the license are there for a reason, you know.
Distros far bigger than OpenBSD fucking with you by distributing
Please immediately take this to your own list, instead of spamming
this list further.
On 2007-11-17 22:10 +0530, Siju George wrote:
See it is not the OpenBSD people who tarnishes you.
It is your own license restrictions that are working against you.
The extra terms in the license are
On Nov 17, 2007 10:38 PM, Nikolay Sturm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Siju George [2007-11-17]:
If OpenBSD changed its license and put in restrictions you would have
no other way but to distribute the old one.
See it is not the OpenBSD people who tarnishes you. It is your own
license
On 2007-11-17 12:03 -0500, Jason Dixon wrote:
I don't think you really care though. You sound like a very bitter
person.
I tend to like bitter. And stout and other varieties too.
--
Tuomo
On Sat 2007.11.17 at 20:40 +0800, Bibby wrote:
Hi, all.
I use OpenBSD 4.2 -release, when i install lam-6.5.9p0.tgz from binary
package, i got this message:
# pkg_add lam
lam-6.5.9p0:
complete
Unknown manpage type /usr/local/man/man3/libmpi.3
Unknown manpage type
On 2007/11/17 13:54, Stuart Henderson wrote:
- I am not too happy about this lot:
char comm[4096];
snprintf(comm,4096,%s %s %s,MOVEIT,p-mailfile,config-virusdirbase);
if(system(comm)) do_log(LOG_CRIT,ERR: move);
snprintf(comm,4096,%s
Hi,
after upgrading from 4.2 to snapshot (packages ~ Nov 3) Gnumeric
doesn't display graphs anymore. They are visible
in the graph's property editor but not in the sheet
itself. Anyone else having same problems?
How to repeat:
create a sheet with cells, for example:
1 10
2 11
3 12
Select
18 matches
Mail list logo
