Hi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I upgrade this morning my system from an old current to the new
current. After, I launch infrastructure/build/out-of-date to see my old
ports. I see my glib2 is out of date.
But I can't compile devel/glib2 port.
See the error:
mkdir .libs/libglib-2.0.lax/lt1-libcharset.a
(cd
On Thu, 2008-04-24 at 14:44 +0200, Nicolas Letellier wrote:
> Hi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I upgrade this morning my system from an old current to the new
> current. After, I launch infrastructure/build/out-of-date to see my old
> ports. I see my glib2 is out of date.
>
> But I can't compile devel/gl
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 02:44:56PM +0200, Nicolas Letellier wrote:
> Hi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I upgrade this morning my system from an old current to the new
> current. After, I launch infrastructure/build/out-of-date to see my old
> ports. I see my glib2 is out of date.
Glib is one of those port
Le Thu, 24 Apr 2008 14:44:56 +0200,
Nicolas Letellier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> Hi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I upgrade this morning my system from an old current to the new
> current. After, I launch infrastructure/build/out-of-date to see my
> old ports. I see my glib2 is out of date.
>
> But
On Thu, 24 Apr 2008, Nicolas Letellier wrote:
I upgrade this morning my system from an old current to the new
current. After, I launch infrastructure/build/out-of-date to see my old
ports. I see my glib2 is out of date.
But I can't compile devel/glib2 port.
See the error:
mkdir .libs/libglib-2
Le Thu, 24 Apr 2008 13:03:19 +0200,
viq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 02:44:56PM +0200, Nicolas Letellier wrote:
> > Hi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > I upgrade this morning my system from an old current to the new
> > current. After, I launch infrastructure/build/out-of-date
There's some DRM code left in xpdf that prevents me from copying
text.
This kills it. ok?
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/textproc/xpdf/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.61
diff -u -p -r1.61 Makefile
--- Makefile19 Apr 2
2.52 has fallen off the back of the wagon. The mirrors don't have it
anymore. Attached patch brings the module up to the current version
3.2. Make regress appears fine. If you use graphics/dvdrip, please
test this (I don't have a DVD drive) since it's a BUILD_DEPEND.
Questions? Concerns?
Jim
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 3:42 PM, Deanna Phillips
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There's some DRM code left in xpdf that prevents me from copying
> text.
>
> This kills it. ok?
Please, don't add things like this to the ports tree. It's purpose is
to easy installation, no to add customized programs
On Thu, 24 Apr 2008, Deanna Phillips wrote:
There's some DRM code left in xpdf that prevents me from copying
text.
This kills it. ok?
[snip]
There are similar checks to prevent printing for example. You only need
to put "return 1;" in OkToPrint()[1]. It's trivial to change the source
and re
On Thursday 24 April 2008 18:41:44 Andrés wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 3:42 PM, Deanna Phillips
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > There's some DRM code left in xpdf that prevents me from copying
> > text.
> >
> > This kills it. ok?
>
> Please, don't add things like this to the ports tree. It
Is anyone working on an update for gnash? They came out with their first
beta release last month.
Daniel Nevistic
On 2008/04/24 19:41, Andrés wrote:
> Please, don't add things like this to the ports tree. It's purpose is
> to easy installation, no to add customized programs. And a flavor
> wouldn't count, as a flavor is a customized _compiled_ program, not a
> program + third party patches. It even makes harde
I'd support the removal of DRM in xpdf, it's mostly a nuisance then a
feature... several programming datasheets have it enabled, it's really rather
stupid to prevent user from coping the "sample" code blocks into a text editor.
Please remove stuff like that, it benefits no-one except those looni
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 8:33 PM, Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2008/04/24 19:41, Andrés wrote:
> > Please, don't add things like this to the ports tree. It's purpose is
> > to easy installation, no to add customized programs. And a flavor
> > wouldn't count, as a flavor is a c
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 7:58 PM, Brad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 24 April 2008 18:41:44 Andrés wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 3:42 PM, Deanna Phillips
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > There's some DRM code left in xpdf that prevents me from copying
> > > text.
> > >
>
* Andr?s <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080424 19:55]:
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 8:33 PM, Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 2008/04/24 19:41, Andr?s wrote:
> > > Please, don't add things like this to the ports tree. It's purpose is
> > > to easy installation, no to add customized programs.
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 4:46 PM, Andrés <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why?
Because ports is about getting things done, and code that gets in the
way of you getting things done must die.
--
GDB has a 'break' feature; why doesn't it have 'fix' too?
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 9:05 PM, Chris Kuethe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 4:46 PM, Andrés <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Why?
>
> Because ports is about getting things done, and code that gets in the
> way of you getting things done must die.
Apply your patches locally
On Thursday 24 April 2008 19:46:04 Andrés wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 7:58 PM, Brad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thursday 24 April 2008 18:41:44 Andrés wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 3:42 PM, Deanna Phillips
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > There's some DRM code left i
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 5:21 PM, Andrés <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Apply your patches locally, fork it, whatever; just don't make the
> port tree a place to get your favorite patches in.It is for
> _installing_ stuff.
1) Too late. We already have some extra patches for various ports
because th
On Thursday 24 April 2008 20:21:30 Andrés wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 9:05 PM, Chris Kuethe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 4:46 PM, Andrés <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Why?
> >
> > Because ports is about getting things done, and code that gets in the
> > way of
Never mind---I will email the port maintainer. I am still reading all of
the OpenBSD ports documentation, and after reading openbsd/ports today,
realized that you can find out who maintains a port and email them
directly! -Dan
Daniel Nevistic
On Thu, 24 Apr 2008, Daniel Thomas Nevistic wrot
On Fri, 24 Apr 2008, Unix Fan wrote:
I'd support the removal of DRM in xpdf, it's mostly a nuisance then a feature...
One could even classify it as a security problem (on PDF protocol level),
since the user of a PDF document is vulnerable to a denial-of-service attack
from a mischevious author.
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 9:05 PM, Chris Kuethe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot=
> e:
> > On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 4:46 PM, Andr=E9s <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Why?
> >
> > Because ports is about getting things done, and code that gets in the
> > way of you getting things done must die.
>
> Appl
25 matches
Mail list logo
