On 2009-05-09, Markus Hennecke wrote:
> Andrej Elizarov wrote:
>> Lucky day, I need boost for wt.
>> It seems wt depend on boost at least v1.35.
>> Markus, do you need any help with porting wt?
>
> Sure, I could use some help.
> If you use the asio port, then boost 1.34.1 will be enough I think. I
hi there,
for any given package pkg_info starts its info like this, e.g.:
amaaq$ pkg_info iodbc-3.52.4p2
Information for inst:iodbc-3.52.4p2
my question is, what does that "inst:" prefix mean,
and can it be something else in different situations?
-f
--
to refuse to decide is a decision.
On 2009/05/12 15:07, frantisek holop wrote:
> hi there,
>
> for any given package pkg_info starts its info like this, e.g.:
>
> amaaq$ pkg_info iodbc-3.52.4p2
> Information for inst:iodbc-3.52.4p2
>
>
>
> my question is, what does that "inst:" prefix mean,
> and can it be something else in dif
For locally installed packages the prefix is "inst:".
If you invoke pkg_info with the name of a pkg that's not installed, it
will be prefixed with the url of the PKG_PATH mirror it got the pkg
from...
i.e. I don't have the mod_auth_ldap package installed, so...
% pkg_info mod_auth_ldap
Informatio
looks like a pretty sane piece of software; it has an extensive
test suite, which passes cleanly in my tests on amd64, arm, i386
and sparc64.
I had one query, they do the linux-style library symlinks,
libvstr.so.[version] -> libvstr-1.0.so.[version]. my inclination
is just to remove it as in the a
On Tue, 12 May 2009, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> looks like a pretty sane piece of software; it has an extensive
> test suite, which passes cleanly in my tests on amd64, arm, i386
> and sparc64.
>
> I had one query, they do the linux-style library symlinks,
> libvstr.so.[version] -> libvstr-1.0.so.
hi there,
during upgrade, library packages that are not needed afterwards
are renamed to .lib something or something.
it is nice, because it shows up right at the top of pkg_info.
i think it would make sense to rename all the partial packages
as .partial something as well no? as it is, it is in
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 04:22:33PM +0200, frantisek holop wrote:
> hi there,
Hi,
> during upgrade, library packages that are not needed afterwards
> are renamed to .lib something or something.
these partial packages often are still needed. They only consist of the
shared libs of the older packag
Bruno suggested I take maintainer for these ports. Attached patches
change maintainer and update to current versions. Patches mostly from
Bruno with minor improvements by me.
Duplicity update includes numerous bug fixes and reverts to GPL v2.
Tested on two i386 servers running nightly backups t
I have a new OpenBSD-4.5 system. I've got an updated copy of the cvs archive,
so I'm sure I have a *very* recent copy of the ports. I wanted a couple of
ports installed before I began my main work on this new system, and that was (1)
cvsup (this worked fine) and (2) a browser. I picked www/seamo
Sounds like you're trying to mix current ports with a stable base:
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq15.html#PkgFAQ
-Nick
Chuck Robey wrote:
I have a new OpenBSD-4.5 system. I've got an updated copy of the cvs archive,
so I'm sure I have a *very* recent copy of the ports. I wanted a couple of
por
Nick Templeton wrote:
> Sounds like you're trying to mix current ports with a stable base:
> http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq15.html#PkgFAQ
Actually, Nik, I have a 4 day old install of the latest release, 4.5, and I
haven't yet rebuilt it. Unless I misunderstand your release setup, this means
I'm N
On 2009/05/12 12:53, Chuck Robey wrote:
> I have a new OpenBSD-4.5 system. I've got an updated copy of the cvs archive,
> so I'm sure I have a *very* recent copy of the ports. I wanted a couple of
> ports installed before I began my main work on this new system, and that was
> (1)
> cvsup (this
===> Checking files for boost-1.39.0p0
>> boost_1_39_0.tar.gz doesn't seem to exist on this system.
>> Fetch
>> http://easynews.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/boost/boost_1_39_0.tar.gz.
boost_1_39_0.tar.gz 100% |***| 35508 KB00:59
>> Size does not match for /usr/por
Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2009-05-09, Markus Hennecke wrote:
Andrej Elizarov wrote:
Lucky day, I need boost for wt.
It seems wt depend on boost at least v1.35.
Markus, do you need any help with porting wt?
Sure, I could use some help.
If you use the asio port, then boost 1.34.1 will be enoug
The headers should have been copied into the boost directory. I am
currently fighting this :-(
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 10:20:14PM +0200, Markus Hennecke wrote:
> Stuart Henderson wrote:
>> On 2009-05-09, Markus Hennecke wrote:
>>> Andrej Elizarov wrote:
Lucky day, I need boost for wt.
If FULLNAME-${FLAVOR} ever was supported, it certainly hasn't been
for a long time now.
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/x11/eterm/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.26
diff -u -p -r1.26 Makefile
--- Makefile8 May 2009 10:25
So asio by itself doesn't fix my problem; I need the integrated version
with boost.
On Sat, May 09, 2009 at 12:13:07PM +0200, Markus Hennecke wrote:
> Andrej Elizarov wrote:
>> Lucky day, I need boost for wt.
>> It seems wt depend on boost at least v1.35.
>> Markus, do you need any help with porti
Hello,
I used to run all my OpenBSD servers with no X11.
Now, to build nmap, you seem to need python. There are no FLAVORS and
so no obvious way to prevent it from requiring python.
And to build python, you need X11R6 installed. There are no FLAVORS
as there used to be, to compile without tkin
> I used to run all my OpenBSD servers with no X11.
>
> Now, to build nmap, you seem to need python. There are no FLAVORS and
> so no obvious way to prevent it from requiring python.
>
> And to build python, you need X11R6 installed. There are no FLAVORS
> as there used to be, to compile withou
On Tue, 12 May 2009, travis+ml-pyt...@subspacefield.org wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I used to run all my OpenBSD servers with no X11.
>
> Now, to build nmap, you seem to need python. There are no FLAVORS and
> so no obvious way to prevent it from requiring python.
>
> And to build python, you need X11
On 2009/05/12 16:01, travis+ml-pyt...@subspacefield.org wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I used to run all my OpenBSD servers with no X11.
>
> Now, to build nmap, you seem to need python. There are no FLAVORS and
> so no obvious way to prevent it from requiring python.
>
> And to build python, you need X11R
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 04:01:26PM -0500, travis+ml-pyt...@subspacefield.org
wrote:
> Now, to build nmap, you seem to need python. There are no FLAVORS and
> so no obvious way to prevent it from requiring python.
building ports without X11 installed isn't supported, just use
packages (the nmap p
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 11:10:46PM +0200, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> Why don't you use packages?
I just tried, and that solved my problem.
I tried to install python from there and it worked just fine.
I liked the ports system but understand Theo's points.
I have this script which basically does
At 04:20 PM 5/12/2009 -0500, travis+ml-pyt...@subspacefield.org wrote:
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 11:10:46PM +0200, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> Why don't you use packages?
Is there an easy way to do this?
Try your own variation of:
export PKG_PATH=ftp:///pub/OpenBSD/`uname -a | cut
-d" " -f 3`/p
On Tue, 12 May 2009, travis+ml-pyt...@subspacefield.org wrote:
> On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 11:10:46PM +0200, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> > Why don't you use packages?
>
> I just tried, and that solved my problem.
>
> I tried to install python from there and it worked just fine.
>
> I liked the port
hmm, on Tue, May 12, 2009 at 04:51:31PM +0200, Markus Lude said that
> > during upgrade, library packages that are not needed afterwards
> > are renamed to .lib something or something.
>
> these partial packages often are still needed. They only consist of the
> shared libs of the older package. S
Thanks all, package stemming drastically simplified my auto-installer.
It was much more fragile before, since, say, /usr/ports/mail/mutt/snapshot
might or might not be there in new releases.
--
Obama Nation | My emails do not have attachments; it's a digital signature
that your mail program doesn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matthias Kilian wrote:
building ports without X11 installed isn't supported,
A useful low-cost, modern solution is a dedicated virtual machine for
building ports, which can then be served via http as packages to other
systems. That's been worki
Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2009/05/12 12:53, Chuck Robey wrote:
>> I have a new OpenBSD-4.5 system. I've got an updated copy of the cvs
>> archive,
>> so I'm sure I have a *very* recent copy of the ports. I wanted a couple of
>> ports installed before I began my main work on this new system, a
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 10:30:00PM -0400, Chuck Robey wrote:
> it, but it's relatively rare for me to use a package, on either OS. The
> difference I see, in building your own ports, is that if you insert an option
> here or there (whether an official one of not), you get exactly whatever
> you'
31 matches
Mail list logo
