Re: How to compile PHP with one single extension?

> >> # env FLAVOR=mysql make package > >> Fatal: Unknown flavor: mysql (in www/php5/extensions) > >> (Possible flavors are: no_x11 no_bz2 no_curl no_dba no_dbase no_gd > >> no_gmp no_imap no_ldap no_mbstring no_mcrypt no_mhash no_mysql no_mysqli > >> no_ncurses no_odbc no_pdo_mysql no_pdo_pgsql n

Re: How to compile PHP with one single extension?

Hello Vijay, i just tried your suggestion.. but it installed every single dependancy not needed by mysql. Including stuff like: bzip2-1.0.5 block-sorting file compressor, unencumbered c-client-2007e University of Washington's c-client mail access routines curl-7.19.3p0 get file

Re: WHat date did OBSD convert -main into packages for the release of 4.6?

On 2009/09/16 14:12, Matthew Young wrote: > I will be more specific sorry. > > With main i meant current. It is my understanding that there comes to a > point where -current is transformed to new next -release. yes, that will go into making 4.7. > My specific interest is: > > http://www.openbsd

Re: WHat date did OBSD convert -main into packages for the release of 4.6?

I will be more specific sorry. With main i meant current. It is my understanding that there comes to a point where -current is transformed to new next -release. My specific interest is: http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/ports/www/apache-httpd/Makefile The last security updates: Revision 1.1

Re: WHat date did OBSD convert -main into packages for the release of 4.6?

On 2009/09/16 12:13, Matthew Young wrote: > There was an update pushed to a -MAIN port 2 weeks ago, id like to know if > that is in time for it to get pushed into the 4.6 release packages. > Could anybody shed some light what the periods for this are before the > release? I'm not sure exactly what

WHat date did OBSD convert -main into packages for the release of 4.6?

Hello, There was an update pushed to a -MAIN port 2 weeks ago, id like to know if that is in time for it to get pushed into the 4.6 release packages. Could anybody shed some light what the periods for this are before the release? Thanks --Matt

Re: Fossil SCM

On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 11:28:18AM -0400, James Turner wrote: > On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 02:12:18PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > On 2009/09/11 21:04, James Turner wrote: > > > Attached is a port of the Fossil SCM [1]. Tested on i386. > > > > > > [1] http://fossil-scm.org > > > > Mostly good,

Re: update: nginx-0.7.62

On Wed, 2009-09-16 at 09:21 -0500, Matthew Young wrote: > Hello Stephan, > > Thank you, but for the users that have never done this... How would this be > used? Save the diff to a file. $ cd /usr/ports/www/nginx $ patch -p0 < /path/to/saved/diff [lots of output that says 'hunk ... succeeded']

Re: update: nginx-0.7.62

Hello Stephan, Thank you, but for the users that have never done this... How would this be used? What would be the difference of adopting this instead of using the patch available at: http://sysoev.ru/nginx/patch.180065.txt does? Thank you. Matthew On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 3:01 AM, Stephan A. R

Re: Please test attached packages of libtheora

On Wed, 16 Sep 2009, Vladimir Támara Patiño wrote: > Good morgning in the Lord Please don't talk in my name unless authorised. -- Antoine

3 noches y pagas 2, Radisson Cancun

En caso de no poder ver correctamente este correo favor de dar haga clic aquí Vigencia al 20 de Diciembre 2009 Comisionable al 15% agencias de Viajes Este mensaje fue enviado para información de nuestras promociones. No pretendemos saturar su correo ni causarle molestias. Este mensaje de cor

[Update] phpldapadmin 1.2.0.3

Hi, This diff updates phpldapadmin to the latest version (1.2.0.3). I can take the maintainership on this port. Tested again OpenLDAP 2.1.30 and 2.4.11. Regards, -- Pierre-Emmanuel André GPG key: 0x7AE329DC Index: Makefile === RCS

Re: Different question about scrotwm -dialog box problem

Mark Peoples wrote: On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 07:41:51PM -0500, neal hogan wrote: I was thinking about that in the meantime. I wasn't (and still not) sure how to deal with monitors of different height in xrandr. So, you've xrandr'd vertically . . . cool! not on my desktop at the momen

update: nginx-0.7.62

On Wed, 2009-09-16 at 00:58 -0500, Matthew Young wrote: > Is there a word from the maintainer when the patch can get pushed to > -current? Here's an update to nginx 0.7.62 that you can help testing and that should contain the patch already. Quick tests on i386, amd64 and sparc64. Cheers, Stephan

Re: How to update an old stable package to a newer stable without downtime?

On 2009/09/16 02:21, Dimitri Syuoul wrote: > Hello, > > Iam an apache2 user (sadly in OBSD 4.5. > > I would like to know what is the best way to update our current apache2 > compilation from stable (2 months old) to the most recent stable version ( > apache-httpd-2.2.13) which holds several CVE f

Re: How to update an old stable package to a newer stable without downtime?

On 16/09/2009, at 5:21 PM, Dimitri Syuoul wrote: Hello, Iam an apache2 user (sadly in OBSD 4.5. I would like to know what is the best way to update our current apache2 compilation from stable (2 months old) to the most recent stable version ( apache-httpd-2.2.13) which holds several CVE

Re: nginx security advisory, and how to apply patch to ones src code?

On 16/09/2009, at 3:58 PM, Matthew Young wrote: Hello all... http://marc.info/?l=nginx&m=125299645117061&w=2 Is there a word from the maintainer when the patch can get pushed to -current? Also, as a nginx user... Could anybody advise how to apply the patch directly to the source code? This i

How to update an old stable package to a newer stable without downtime?

Hello, Iam an apache2 user (sadly in OBSD 4.5. I would like to know what is the best way to update our current apache2 compilation from stable (2 months old) to the most recent stable version ( apache-httpd-2.2.13) which holds several CVE fixes). Hence apache-httpd is not just one package but a