Re: [Bacula-users] Building bacula on OpenBSD

2007-04-10 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Tuesday 10 April 2007 15:52, Brian A. Seklecki wrote: > It looks like some significant improvements have been made to st(4): > > http://www.openbsd.org/plus41.html > > "Make the st(4) SCSI Tape midlayer return values when receiving a > MTIOCGET ioctl, allows things like Bacula to work much" N

Re: [Bacula-users] Building bacula on OpenBSD

2007-04-10 Thread K WESTERBACK
ED]> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; ports@openbsd.org; bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2007 3:52:10 PM Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Building bacula on OpenBSD It looks like some significant improvements have been made to st(4): http://www.openbsd.org/plus41.ht

Re: [Bacula-users] Building bacula on OpenBSD

2007-04-10 Thread Brian A. Seklecki
It looks like some significant improvements have been made to st(4): http://www.openbsd.org/plus41.html "Make the st(4) SCSI Tape midlayer return values when receiving a MTIOCGET ioctl, allows things like Bacula to work much" http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/sys/scsi/st.c Thank you for

Re: [Bacula-users] Building bacula on OpenBSD

2006-12-14 Thread Brian A. Seklecki
On Wed, 2006-12-13 at 19:27 +0100, Kern Sibbald wrote: > On Wednesday 13 December 2006 18:28, Brian A. Seklecki wrote: > > > > Stop in /usr/local/src/bacula-1.38.11/src/stored. > > > > > > It looks to me like the OS' header file is badly broken -- at > least in the > > > sense that if it is a Uni

Re: [Bacula-users] Building bacula on OpenBSD

2006-12-13 Thread GUILLON Gabriel
This link: http://people.collaborativefusion.com/~seklecki/bacula_openbsd_port.tar seems to be broken Brian A. Seklecki a écrit : > > Here is a functional FD on OpenBSD 4.0/i386: > > bash-3.2# uname -a > OpenBSD vmware-sandbox.pgh.priv.collaborativefusion.com 4.0 > GENERIC.MP+RAIDFRAME#1 > > b

Re: [Bacula-users] Building bacula on OpenBSD

2006-12-13 Thread Kern Sibbald
Hello, Since this is directed to me, and assuming I wrote the double >>'ed sections below (which sound a lot like me but so much is snipped that I cannot be sure), I can assure you that, my intention, if I am the guity party was not to insult any person or any particular OS, but just to point o

Re: [Bacula-users] Building bacula on OpenBSD

2006-12-13 Thread Brian A. Seklecki
Just adding readline and OpenSSL support. Good to go now. ...OpenBSD doesn't have a "portlint" equiv, does it? ~BAS On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, GUILLON Gabriel wrote: This link: http://people.collaborativefusion.com/~seklecki/bacula_openbsd_port.tar seems to be broken Brian A. Seklecki a écrit :

Re: [Bacula-users] Building bacula on OpenBSD

2006-12-13 Thread Brian A. Seklecki
Here is a functional FD on OpenBSD 4.0/i386: bash-3.2# uname -a OpenBSD vmware-sandbox.pgh.priv.collaborativefusion.com 4.0 GENERIC.MP+RAIDFRAME#1 bash-3.2# /usr/local/sbin/bacula-fd -u root -g wheel -d128 -v -c /usr/local/etc/bacula-fd.conf -f vmware-sandbox-fd: jcr.c:129 read_last_jobs s

Re: [Bacula-users] Building bacula on OpenBSD

2006-12-13 Thread Brian A. Seklecki
> > Stop in /usr/local/src/bacula-1.38.11/src/stored. > > It looks to me like the OS' header file is badly broken -- at least in the > sense that if it is a Unix system, both mt_fileno and mt_blkno should be > defined in the struct mtget. > > Someone should fix the OS, barring that we will need