On Mon, Feb 08, 2021 at 12:22:27PM -0500, Kurt Mosiejczuk wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 08, 2021 at 05:00:54PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > i'll go with "that isn't terrible". ;)
> > also "it's way better than the 'process' i have for rebuilding snappy-java".
> Why thank you. Much of the
On Mon, Feb 08, 2021 at 05:00:54PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2021/02/08 08:39, Kurt Mosiejczuk wrote:
> > Here's a new port for lwjgl3. It's a new port since there are existing
> > things that use the lwjgl 2.x version we already have.
> ;
> ; DISTFILES +=${DISTNAME}.tar.gz \
On 2021/02/08 08:39, Kurt Mosiejczuk wrote:
> Here's a new port for lwjgl3. It's a new port since there are existing
> things that use the lwjgl 2.x version we already have.
>
> Upstream is not interested in supporting BSD and has expressed hope that
> someone would fork the code for BSD support
Here's a new port for lwjgl3. It's a new port since there are existing
things that use the lwjgl 2.x version we already have.
Upstream is not interested in supporting BSD and has expressed hope that
someone would fork the code for BSD support (so they don't have to deal
with it). So this is based
