On 2020/09/02 18:09, Austin Hook wrote:
>
> Just confirming that getting the right bsd.rd (6.7) from cdn.openbsd.org,
> seemed to solve any problem I had.
>
> Did have to select "remove updated packages first" was necessary, as my
> /usr/local space was getting too crowded. Probably lots
Just confirming that getting the right bsd.rd (6.7) from cdn.openbsd.org,
seemed to solve any problem I had.
Did have to select "remove updated packages first" was necessary, as my
/usr/local space was getting too crowded. Probably lots of packages I am
not using, and could weed them,
> > slippery# pkg_info -mz >/root/pkg_list_manual
> >
> > Package database already locked... awaiting release... ^C
>
> Are any other pkg_* or fw_update processes running at the same time?
> It uses flock() on a file, I was under
On 2020/09/02 13:42, Austin Hook wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Aug 2020, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > If you need to get it fixed, the following should do the trick;
> > save a list of packages, remove them all, and reinstall:
> >
> > pkg_info -mz >/root/pkg_list_manual
> > pkg_info -z
On Sun, 2 Aug 2020, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> If you need to get it fixed, the following should do the trick;
> save a list of packages, remove them all, and reinstall:
>
> pkg_info -mz >/root/pkg_list_manual
> pkg_info -z >/root/pkg_list_full
> pkg_delete -X
Hi Stuart,
Never knew any of the mailing lists took attachments. I hope no one
starts posting videos.
Fascinating about the packages. Maybe it wasn't all my fault. That would
be a first time! And thanks for the reminder of how to save the names of
all the ports.
Yes, I noticed that I
On 2020/08/01 17:38, Austin Hook wrote:
>
> Hi Stuart,
>Here's the full typescript attached. The list itself chops off
> attachments I think, but I am sure any of us can delete my email, or even
> save after deleting the attachment, as I often do within alpine with long
> videos of funny
On 2020/08/01 16:53, Austin Hook wrote:
> Stuart suggested sending the entire pkg_add -u" output for a quick scan
> of my foolishness, so I an including it at the bottom of this email --
> lines chopped at character 78, because all the linking stuff makes it half
> a megabyte, which seems
Hi Vijay,
Nice to hear from you too -- and it's been a while. I think your test
- experience is quite useful, and your synopsis is encouraging. No need
to send all the gory details.
I was a bit afraid to mess around too much with the machine I do most
of my work at home on. I had
On Thu, 30 Jul 2020 09:32:53 -0600 (MDT)
Austin Hook :
> Here's the output of pkg_check
>
> farm# pkg_check
> Packing-list sanity: ok
> Direct dependencies: ok
> --- gcj-4.9.4p12 ---
> dependency lang/gcc/4.9,-main:gcc->=4.9,<4.10:gcc-4.9.4p12 does not match
> any installed
Hi Austin,
I wanted to see if I could simulate your situation. Since I had a 6.6
-stable desktop, I did a syspatch, upgraded that to 6.7, and then
encountered something very much like what you described when I did a
pkg_add -uUvVm.
Not completely sure why but I felt that spidermonkey
Yes, I do believe the pkg_add -u is failing.
For starters here is my current package source info.
=
farm# echo $PKG_PATH
farm# cat /etc/installurl
On 2020/07/29 09:36, Austin Hook wrote:
>
> Probably got my packages messed up at some point, and should just stop
> doing endless "upgrades", and start clean with 6.7, but for learning
> purposes and perspective, would appreciate tips on why doing a pkg_add of
> firefox under 6.6 would fail,
Here's the output of pkg_check
farm# pkg_check
Packing-list sanity: ok
Direct dependencies: ok
--- gcj-4.9.4p12 ---
dependency lang/gcc/4.9,-main:gcc->=4.9,<4.10:gcc-4.9.4p12 does not match
any installed package
Reverse dependencies: ok
Files from packages: ok
---
Austin Hook wrote:
> At one point the -u complains of a "loop" and asks me if I want to
> proceed anyway [n,y,a] so I select "a". After completion pkg_add -u
> the pkg_add firefox still fails.
Have you tried pkg_check?
Best Regards,
Stefan
--
Stefan Hagen | (gopher|https)://codevoid.de/0/gpg
Thanks Solene,
I did pkg_add -u && pkg_add firefox and it still failed. At one point
the -u complains of a "loop" and asks me if I want to proceed anyway
[n,y,a] so I select "a". After completion pkg_add -u the pkg_add firefox
still fails.
You pointed out that you don't see atk-1,
Probably got my packages messed up at some point, and should just stop
doing endless "upgrades", and start clean with 6.7, but for learning
purposes and perspective, would appreciate tips on why doing a pkg_add of
firefox under 6.6 would fail, while looking for a version of atk that that
is
17 matches
Mail list logo
