On Fri, Dec 08 2017, Renaud Allard wrote:
> On 12/07/2017 11:20 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>> On 2017/12/07 20:26, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> net/tacacs+ shows its age, the md5 code uses "long" as if it was 32
>>> bits, which probably doesn't fly on amd64. DES supports r
On 12/07/2017 11:20 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2017/12/07 20:26, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> net/tacacs+ shows its age, the md5 code uses "long" as if it was 32
>> bits, which probably doesn't fly on amd64. DES supports relies on
>> crypt(3), which our libc doesn't suppor
On 2017/12/07 20:26, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> net/tacacs+ shows its age, the md5 code uses "long" as if it was 32
> bits, which probably doesn't fly on amd64. DES supports relies on
> crypt(3), which our libc doesn't support. End result: I was not able to
> perform a single s
Hi,
net/tacacs+ shows its age, the md5 code uses "long" as if it was 32
bits, which probably doesn't fly on amd64. DES supports relies on
crypt(3), which our libc doesn't support. End result: I was not able to
perform a single successful auth with Authen::TacacsPlus. Also the
logging code suff