Re: Kill net/tacacs+ ?

2017-12-08 Thread Jeremie Courreges-Anglas
On Fri, Dec 08 2017, Renaud Allard wrote: > On 12/07/2017 11:20 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote: >> On 2017/12/07 20:26, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> net/tacacs+ shows its age, the md5 code uses "long" as if it was 32 >>> bits, which probably doesn't fly on amd64. DES supports r

Re: Kill net/tacacs+ ?

2017-12-08 Thread Renaud Allard
On 12/07/2017 11:20 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2017/12/07 20:26, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> net/tacacs+ shows its age, the md5 code uses "long" as if it was 32 >> bits, which probably doesn't fly on amd64. DES supports relies on >> crypt(3), which our libc doesn't suppor

Re: Kill net/tacacs+ ?

2017-12-07 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2017/12/07 20:26, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote: > > Hi, > > net/tacacs+ shows its age, the md5 code uses "long" as if it was 32 > bits, which probably doesn't fly on amd64. DES supports relies on > crypt(3), which our libc doesn't support. End result: I was not able to > perform a single s

Kill net/tacacs+ ?

2017-12-07 Thread Jeremie Courreges-Anglas
Hi, net/tacacs+ shows its age, the md5 code uses "long" as if it was 32 bits, which probably doesn't fly on amd64. DES supports relies on crypt(3), which our libc doesn't support. End result: I was not able to perform a single successful auth with Authen::TacacsPlus. Also the logging code suff