Re: Question about webmail for users who are not busy on ports prep for 4.6

2009-07-07 Thread frantisek holop
hmm, on Sat, Jul 04, 2009 at 08:05:07PM +1000, Rod Whitworth said that > Does anybody know what combination works well with nothing as silly as > mismatched db versions? Maybe there is a way to get Roundcube (the postfix/dovecot/openwebmail postfix talks directly to dovecot, it's a breeze. (debug

Re: Question about webmail for users who are not busy on ports prep for 4.6

2009-07-04 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2009/07/04 12:27, tico wrote: > I'm a big fan of Cyrus. Not because it's always the easiest to set > up, or because the documentation is retard-proof, but because it's > ridiculously scalable, and I've used it for many years without it > ever disappointing me. The more difficult (though flexible

Re: Question about webmail for users who are not busy on ports prep for 4.6

2009-07-04 Thread Simon Bertrang
On Sat, Jul 04, 2009 at 08:05:07PM +1000, Rod Whitworth wrote: > I have been running email for a couple of small domains for a few years > using Postfix and Teapop on OpenBSD. No complaints. > > I have scripted user addition with passwords etc etc. > > Now somebody (important of course) wants web

Re: Question about webmail for users who are not busy on ports prep for 4.6

2009-07-04 Thread Chris Bennett
Rod Whitworth wrote: On Sat, 4 Jul 2009 13:00:53 +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2009/07/04 20:05, Rod Whitworth wrote: So which imap? Dovecot looked like a candidate. It can use sqlite as does Roundcube and I know it can do authentication for Postfix so it looked like a suitable c

Re: Question about webmail for users who are not busy on ports prep for 4.6

2009-07-04 Thread tico
Rod Whitworth wrote: On Sat, 4 Jul 2009 13:00:53 +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2009/07/04 20:05, Rod Whitworth wrote: So which imap? Dovecot looked like a candidate. It can use sqlite as does Roundcube and I know it can do authentication for Postfix so it looked like a suitable can

Re: Question about webmail for users who are not busy on ports prep for 4.6

2009-07-04 Thread Rod Whitworth
On Sat, 4 Jul 2009 13:00:53 +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: >On 2009/07/04 20:05, Rod Whitworth wrote: >> So which imap? Dovecot looked like a candidate. It can use sqlite as >> does Roundcube and I know it can do authentication for Postfix so it >> looked like a suitable candidate. > >I haven't fo

Re: Question about webmail for users who are not busy on ports prep for 4.6

2009-07-04 Thread Zhang Huangbin
On Jul 4, 2009, at 6:05 PM, Rod Whitworth wrote: So looking at others needing imap showed me RoundCube. Pretty snazzy looks, renders all that fancy junk that seems to be all the go now and we have a package for it. Vote +1 for Roundcube webmail. So which imap? Dovecot looked like a candida

Re: Question about webmail for users who are not busy on ports prep for 4.6

2009-07-04 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2009/07/04 20:05, Rod Whitworth wrote: > So which imap? Dovecot looked like a candidate. It can use sqlite as > does Roundcube and I know it can do authentication for Postfix so it > looked like a suitable candidate. I haven't found any "perfect" webmail but Roundcube looks nice, is easy to get

Question about webmail for users who are not busy on ports prep for 4.6

2009-07-04 Thread Rod Whitworth
I have been running email for a couple of small domains for a few years using Postfix and Teapop on OpenBSD. No complaints. I have scripted user addition with passwords etc etc. Now somebody (important of course) wants webmail. I went hunting. About the only webmail server I found that did not n