Re: [NEW] archivers/lrzip

2022-06-21 Thread Omar Polo
Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2022/06/19 16:48, Rubén Llorente wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 10:35:13PM +0200, Omar Polo wrote: > > > the part of the getrlimit could be simplified, see the version in the > > > updated tarball attached. > > > > I am including a new version with this message.

Re: [NEW] archivers/lrzip

2022-06-20 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2022/06/19 16:48, Rubén Llorente wrote: > On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 10:35:13PM +0200, Omar Polo wrote: > > the part of the getrlimit could be simplified, see the version in the > > updated tarball attached. > > I am including a new version with this message. With this version of the > patch, th

Re: [NEW] archivers/lrzip

2022-06-14 Thread Omar Polo
Rubén Llorente wrote: > Has anybody done any testing with this port? Does anybody think it is > ripe for import? few comments: SHARED_LIBS is not needed anymore as it doesn't install a shared library anymore. WANTLIB is wrong. What I often do is just comment the wantlibs in the makefile and th

Re: [NEW] archivers/lrzip

2022-05-27 Thread George Koehler
On Fri, 27 May 2022 23:02:46 +0200 Rubén Llorente wrote: > I have also shamelessly copied the mechanism sort uses for rising its > RDATA_LIMIT and tests so far look good. Still I have to figure out how > to do the same thing with the stack size. > > Also, how portable are setrlimit and getrlimit

Re: [NEW] archivers/lrzip

2022-05-27 Thread Omar Polo
Rubén Llorente wrote: > On Fri, May 20, 2022 at 07:35:14PM +0200, Omar Polo wrote: > > The good news is that with the above changes the ports looks good IMHO. > > The bad news is that now the builds fails (link error in the embedded > > lzma copy) so it needs more work (using lzma from ports if po

Re: [NEW] archivers/lrzip

2022-05-26 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2022/05/26 20:51, Rubén Llorente wrote: > On Sat, May 21, 2022 at 10:48:33AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > how is it detecting how much memory to use? if it's looking at available > > physical memory without considering resource limits, could that be changed? > > > > there is precedent for

Re: [NEW] archivers/lrzip

2022-05-21 Thread Stuart Henderson
how is it detecting how much memory to use? if it's looking at available physical memory without considering resource limits, could that be changed? there is precedent for programs to adjust RLIMIT_DATA from the default to the max available within the current limit if they know they're likely to n

Re: [NEW] archivers/lrzip

2022-05-20 Thread Omar Polo
Hello Rubén, Rubén Llorente wrote: > Port for lrzip included as an attachment. > > > On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 12:49:51AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > please send ports as attachments to the list > > Some comments on the port: - COMMENT should start with a lowercase. (maybe we can also