Jeremie Courreges-Anglas writes:
> Jeremie Courreges-Anglas writes:
>
>> Ian McWilliam writes:
>>
>>> Revision 1.219 / (download) - annotate - [select for diffs], Tue Apr 12
>>> 17:42:09 2016 UTC (4 months, 3 weeks ago) by
Jeremie Courreges-Anglas writes:
> Ian McWilliam writes:
>
>> Revision 1.219 / (download) - annotate - [select for diffs], Tue Apr 12
>> 17:42:09 2016 UTC (4 months, 3 weeks ago) by jca
>>
>> Update to samba-4.3.6
>>
>> i386 build by danj@,
Ian McWilliam writes:
> Revision 1.219 / (download) - annotate - [select for diffs], Tue Apr 12
> 17:42:09 2016 UTC (4 months, 3 weeks ago) by jca
>
> Update to samba-4.3.6
>
> i386 build by danj@, ok sthen@
>
> The changelog between 4.1.23 and 4.3.6 is too
Jiri B writes:
> On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 08:53:20AM +0300, kasak wrote:
>
>> I think, if Theo says that we don't need acl, than we don't need acl. He
>> knows better. Keeping things simple is very secure and this is good!
>> I am very thankful to you for maintaining samba on
On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 08:53:20AM +0300, kasak wrote:
> I think, if Theo says that we don't need acl, than we don't need acl. He
> knows better. Keeping things simple is very secure and this is good!
> I am very thankful to you for maintaining samba on OpenBSD! Undoubtedly ,
> OpenBSD is now
_
> From: owner-po...@openbsd.org [owner-po...@openbsd.org] on behalf of Jeremie
> Courreges-Anglas [j...@wxcvbn.org]
> Sent: Friday, 9 September 2016 7:01 AM
> To: kasak
> Cc: ports@openbsd.org
> Subject: Re: Samba as DC on OpenBSD 6.0 is
[j...@wxcvbn.org]
Sent: Friday, 9 September 2016 7:01 AM
To: kasak
Cc: ports@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: Samba as DC on OpenBSD 6.0 is unusable :(
samba port maintainer here,
kasak <ka...@kasakoff.net> writes:
Maybe I am doing something wrong ?
I have tried to provision domain and got
09.09.2016 00:01, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas пишет:
samba port maintainer here,
kasak writes:
Maybe I am doing something wrong ?
I have tried to provision domain and got error that samba was compiled
without acl support.
On some forums I found advice to use
September 2016 7:01 AM
To: kasak
Cc: ports@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: Samba as DC on OpenBSD 6.0 is unusable :(
samba port maintainer here,
kasak <ka...@kasakoff.net> writes:
> Maybe I am doing something wrong ?
>
> I have tried to provision domain and got error that samba was compile
On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 11:01:45PM +0200, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
> Everything is possible, but our lack of ACLs and extended attributes
> make OpenBSD a poor choice for samba, even if upstream supports backends
> that don't suffer these limitations. From my POV, net/samba is here
> first
samba port maintainer here,
kasak writes:
> Maybe I am doing something wrong ?
>
> I have tried to provision domain and got error that samba was compiled
> without acl support.
>
> On some forums I found advice to use "--use-ntvfs" option when provisioning.
>
> But it
Maybe I am doing something wrong ?
I have tried to provision domain and got error that samba was compiled
without acl support.
On some forums I found advice to use "--use-ntvfs" option when provisioning.
But it appeared that samba-tool doesn't know about this option:
$ doas samba-tool
12 matches
Mail list logo