Yeah I think you are right. Updated just to keep the comment regarding
version sensitivity between b2sdk <-> duplicity.
README added.
On 2023-09-25 7:33 a.m., Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2023/09/25 11:21, Stuart Henderson wrote:
I think it's intentional that duplicity doesm't force a depend
On 2023/09/25 11:21, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2023/09/24 21:49, Paul Galbraith wrote:
> > Patch to add dependency on net/py-b2sdk to support backup to
> > Backblaze B2. First class support for this platform is
> > already built into duplicity (https://duplicity.gitlab.io/).
>
> I think it's i
On 2023/09/24 21:49, Paul Galbraith wrote:
> Patch to add dependency on net/py-b2sdk to support backup to
> Backblaze B2. First class support for this platform is
> already built into duplicity (https://duplicity.gitlab.io/).
I think it's intentional that duplicity doesm't force a dependency on
s
Patch to add dependency on net/py-b2sdk to support backup to Backblaze
B2. First class support for this platform is already built into
duplicity (https://duplicity.gitlab.io/).
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/sysutils/dup
Ping.
--
viq
On Sun, 2015-12-27 at 01:40 +0500, Alexandr Shadchin wrote:
>
> Does anyone have any objections? If not then I will commit.
Are you waiting for updated patch, or objections? It just occured to me
it could be the former...
--
viq
On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 09:12:19PM +0100, viq wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-12-24 at 20:42 +0100, viq wrote:
> > On Tue, 2015-12-15 at 22:46 +0100, Daniel Jakots wrote:
> > > On Sun, 13 Dec 2015 13:51:43 +0100, viq wrote:
> > >
> > > > Here's a tarball of duplicity 0.7.06, so it's easier to import
> > >
On Thu, 2015-12-24 at 20:42 +0100, viq wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-12-15 at 22:46 +0100, Daniel Jakots wrote:
> > On Sun, 13 Dec 2015 13:51:43 +0100, viq wrote:
> >
> > > Here's a tarball of duplicity 0.7.06, so it's easier to import
> > > next
> > > to
> > > existing 0.6.x. I can provide it in a form
On Tue, 2015-12-15 at 22:46 +0100, Daniel Jakots wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Dec 2015 13:51:43 +0100, viq wrote:
>
> > Here's a tarball of duplicity 0.7.06, so it's easier to import next
> > to
> > existing 0.6.x. I can provide it in a form of a diff as well.
>
> I guess that it would have been easier w
First, thank you for interest, and sorry for the delay.
On wto, 2015-12-15 at 22:46 +0100, Daniel Jakots wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Dec 2015 13:51:43 +0100, viq wrote:
>
> > Here's a tarball of duplicity 0.7.06, so it's easier to import next
> > to
> > existing 0.6.x. I can provide it in a form of a di
On Sun, 13 Dec 2015 13:51:43 +0100, viq wrote:
> Here's a tarball of duplicity 0.7.06, so it's easier to import next to
> existing 0.6.x. I can provide it in a form of a diff as well.
I guess that it would have been easier with a diff, but that's my
opinion :)
> Works for me for my simple usage
On Sun, 2015-12-13 at 13:51 +0100, viq wrote:
> Here's a tarball of duplicity 0.7.06, so it's easier to import next
> to
> existing 0.6.x. I can provide it in a form of a diff as well.
> Works for me for my simple usage (duply backups to hubic).
> I would very much like this version to be available
Here's a tarball of duplicity 0.7.06, so it's easier to import next to
existing 0.6.x. I can provide it in a form of a diff as well.
Works for me for my simple usage (duply backups to hubic).
I would very much like this version to be available, as this allows to
backup to newer, cheaper backends th
Thank you Jason for your update, which has just been committed. Sorry
for the delay!
--
jca | PGP : 0x1524E7EE / 5135 92C1 AD36 5293 2BDF DDCC 0DFA 74AE 1524 E7EE
for it.
>
> Thx.
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Jason Tubnor
> Date: 19 August 2014 12:49
> Subject: Update: sysutils/duplicity
> To: ports@openbsd.org, j...@openbsd.org
>
>
> Hi,
>
> This is an update, enhancement and build fix for sysutils/dupl
Antoine Jacoutot writes:
> On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 07:33:21AM +1000, Jason Tubnor wrote:
[...]
>> A flavour sounds like a good idea and I'll work on that in spare time but
>> don't let it hold this up.
>
> I think a simple note in DESCR is enough.
> No need for a FLAVOR nor imposing dependencie
On Mon, September 1, 2014 01:33, Jason Tubnor wrote:
> On 1 September 2014 04:12, J?r?mie Courr?ges-Anglas wrote:
>
>
>> Those deps are optional and I don't think it makes sense to ask users to
>> install
>> support for all backends supported by duplicity (the list is long).
>>
>
> Ok with me. Th
On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 07:33:21AM +1000, Jason Tubnor wrote:
> On 1 September 2014 04:12, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote:
>
>
> > Those deps are optional and I don't think it makes sense to ask users to
> > install
> > support for all backends supported by duplicity (the list is long).
> >
>
>
On 1 September 2014 04:12, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote:
> Those deps are optional and I don't think it makes sense to ask users to
> install
> support for all backends supported by duplicity (the list is long).
>
Ok with me. The backends are in and the same outcome is achieved, be it
with a
On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 08:12:37PM +0200, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote:
> Giovanni Bechis writes:
>
> > On 08/28/14 00:57, Jason Tubnor wrote:
> >> On 27 August 2014 21:29, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote:
> >>> Untested so far, one nit below.
>
> [...]
>
> >>> ... the files are added here an
Giovanni Bechis writes:
> On 08/28/14 00:57, Jason Tubnor wrote:
>> On 27 August 2014 21:29, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote:
>>> Untested so far, one nit below.
[...]
>>> ... the files are added here anyway. The CHANGELOG says that it was
>>> fixed in this release, so it probably makes sense
On 08/28/14 00:57, Jason Tubnor wrote:
> On 27 August 2014 21:29, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote:
>
>>
>> Untested so far, one nit below.
>>
>> Index: pkg/PLIST
>> ===
>> RCS file: /var/cvs/ports/sysutils/duplicity/pkg/PLIST,v
>> ret
On 27 August 2014 21:29, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote:
>
> Untested so far, one nit below.
>
> Index: pkg/PLIST
> ===
> RCS file: /var/cvs/ports/sysutils/duplicity/pkg/PLIST,v
> retrieving revision 1.13
> diff -u -p -r1.13 PLIST
>
(Adding Jim to the Cc: list.)
Giovanni Bechis writes:
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 02:26:14PM +0200, Giovanni Bechis wrote:
>> On 08/26/14 12:43, Jason Tubnor wrote:
>> > On 26 August 2014 16:33, Giovanni Bechis wrote:
>> >
>> >> I will commit it in a couple of days, do you want to take maintain
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 02:26:14PM +0200, Giovanni Bechis wrote:
> On 08/26/14 12:43, Jason Tubnor wrote:
> > On 26 August 2014 16:33, Giovanni Bechis wrote:
> >
> >> I will commit it in a couple of days, do you want to take maintainership
> >> or do you prefer to set ports@ as maintainer ?
> >
On 08/26/14 12:43, Jason Tubnor wrote:
> On 26 August 2014 16:33, Giovanni Bechis wrote:
>
>> I will commit it in a couple of days, do you want to take maintainership
>> or do you prefer to set ports@ as maintainer ?
>
> Thanks Giovanni. I'll take the maintainership on. Jason Tubnor
>
>
> Ch
On 26 August 2014 16:33, Giovanni Bechis wrote:
> I will commit it in a couple of days, do you want to take maintainership
> or do you prefer to set ports@ as maintainer ?
Thanks Giovanni. I'll take the maintainership on. Jason Tubnor
Cheers,
Jason
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 01:25:38PM +1000, Jason Tubnor wrote:
> Ping?
>
> P.S. Now also tested on macppc. Maintainer email is also broken -
> maybe change back to ports@ or I'll take the maintainer status for it.
>
I will commit it in a couple of days, do you want to take maintainership
or do y
Ping?
P.S. Now also tested on macppc. Maintainer email is also broken -
maybe change back to ports@ or I'll take the maintainer status for it.
Thx.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Jason Tubnor
Date: 19 August 2014 12:49
Subject: Update: sysutils/duplicity
To: ports@openbs
Hi,
This is an update, enhancement and build fix for sysutils/duplicity. Notes are:
- Version bump from 0.6.23 to 0.6.24
- Added archivers/par2cmdline for par2+ wrapper support
- Remove ${MODPY_LIB_DEPENDS} due to make package reporting that it
wasn't required
- Added MODPY_SETUPTOOLS = Yes as t
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 04:35:27PM -0400, Jim Razmus wrote:
> * Stefan Sperling [100921 15:31]:
> > Light testing suggests that it works.
> >
> > ok?
> >
>
> Does MASTER_SITES need to be updated similar to my older patch?
> http://bitbucket.org/bonetruck/my-ports-wip/src/tip/sysutils_duplicity
* Stefan Sperling [100921 15:31]:
> Light testing suggests that it works.
>
> ok?
>
Does MASTER_SITES need to be updated similar to my older patch?
http://bitbucket.org/bonetruck/my-ports-wip/src/tip/sysutils_duplicity
Can you confirm what destination(s) you've backed up to and restored
from?
Light testing suggests that it works.
ok?
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/sysutils/duplicity/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.10
diff -u -p -r1.10 Makefile
--- Makefile30 Aug 2010 17:57:31 - 1.10
+++ Makefile
33 matches
Mail list logo
