On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 06:28:13PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> I think it's correct to remove those extras.
>
> libexecinfo is an extra specially annoying case because many ports are only
> prepared to deal with Linux (execinfo.h header but the backtrace functions are
> in libc). I'm not sure
On 2019/06/11 16:16, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 10:34:21PM +0200, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 08:10:58PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > > Removing execinfo from WANTLIB nullifies the devel/libexecinfo
> > > LIB_DEPENDS ..
> > That... is a valid point.
On Tue, 11 Jun 2019 16:16:04 +1000, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> Is there a push to move everything to python3 now?
I don't think we will be able to suddenly flip a switch and look at
what breaks as breakage will probably be at runtime. I think it's
easier to do what kn is doing, switching port by por
On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 04:16:04PM +1000, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> I don't see why you are removing libcurses and libz from wantlib
Because even after Stuart's reply and my revised diff, I rushed things
without looking around... `make port-lib-depends-check` lists those libs
as extra - I should check
On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 10:34:21PM +0200, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 08:10:58PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > Removing execinfo from WANTLIB nullifies the devel/libexecinfo LIB_DEPENDS
> > ..
> That... is a valid point. I'll leave it in and double check tooling's
> output
On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 12:11:37AM +0200, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> Why does this have an unconditional dependency on ports LLVM?
> For example, on amd64, it actually uses base LLVM unless i read
> the build logs incorrectly.
>
> I realize this is unrelated to your changes, just wondering...
I intent
Hi Klemens,
the authors of this tool absolutely do not understand how documentation
works. That said, i agree it is better to install whatever piss-poor
and disorganized musings they do provide rather than installing no
documentation whatsoever.
See below in-line for two questions, none of which
On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 08:10:58PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> Removing execinfo from WANTLIB nullifies the devel/libexecinfo LIB_DEPENDS ..
That... is a valid point. I'll leave it in and double check tooling's
output before cooking diffs, thanks.
Index: Makefile
On 2019/06/10 18:47, Klemens Nanni wrote:
>
> -WANTLIB= c curses execinfo form m pthread z
> +WANTLIB= ${COMPILER_LIBCXX} c m pthread
> LLVM_V= 7.0.1
> BUILD_DEPENDS= devel/llvm>=${LLVM_V}
> RUN_DEPENDS= devel/llvm>=${LLVM_V}
> LIB_DEPENDS= devel/libexecinfo
Removi
Came here to ship docs so I don't have to browse the web to lern how to
use it, but improved a bit more while here.
- derive PKGNAME from DISTNAME so future bumps require only one change
- sync WANTLIB according to `port-lib-depends-check`
- PERMIT_PACKAGE
- use TLS
- use Python3
- Python is RDEP
10 matches
Mail list logo