On 2023/06/29 15:42, Sebastien Marie wrote:
> With latest changes on ecl, we are able to update sbcl to latest version
> (2.3.6).
turns out that new sbcl fails on i386, here's the end of build log.
cc -O2 -pipe -g -Wall -Wundef -Wsign-compare -Wpointer-arith
-I/usr/local/include -pthread
On Fri, Jun 30, 2023, at 20:36, Sebastien Marie wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As lang/sbcl has been updated to 2.3.6, the compression method changed
> from libz
> to libzstd.
>
> As stumpwm is built using sbcl, the port needs few adjustments to add
> LIB_DEPENDS on zstd, and updated WANTLIB.
>
> Comments or
On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 07:34:05PM +0200, develo...@robert-palm.de wrote:
> Zitat von Sebastien Marie :
> >
> > The port is buildable on wider architectures range.
> >
>
> Thank you. Will it be available for RISC V, too ?
>
yes, riscv64 should have it.
I know sbcl has code for it, but as I
Hi,
As lang/sbcl has been updated to 2.3.6, the compression method changed from
libz
to libzstd.
As stumpwm is built using sbcl, the port needs few adjustments to add
LIB_DEPENDS on zstd, and updated WANTLIB.
Comments or OK ?
--
Sebastien Marie
diff /home/semarie/repos/openbsd/ports
commit
Zitat von Sebastien Marie :
Hi,
With latest changes on ecl, we are able to update sbcl to latest
version (2.3.6).
As maintainer systematically timeout since several years now, I am
taking over
the maintainership (and no reply on private mail asking about
continuing or not
to maintain
On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 01:37:48PM +0200, solene wrote:
>
> I don't know if this is expected, I wanted to try to build sbcl using
> ecl on amd64 because I don't have any other arch to try the build with
> ecl, but it's not working, I attached the build log
> ===> lang/sbcl
> ===> Building from
Hello,
On 2023/06/29 15:42:00 +0200, Sebastien Marie wrote:
> Hi,
>
> With latest changes on ecl, we are able to update sbcl to latest version
> (2.3.6).
>
> As maintainer systematically timeout since several years now, I am taking
> over
> the maintainership (and no reply on private mail
Hi,
With latest changes on ecl, we are able to update sbcl to latest version
(2.3.6).
As maintainer systematically timeout since several years now, I am taking over
the maintainership (and no reply on private mail asking about continuing or not
to maintain lang/sbcl).
I have mostly rewritten
On Wed, 8 Dec 2021 23:50:33 +0100
Solene Rapenne wrote:
> new update, we are really lagging behind :/
>
> same problems with test, one failing in normal flavor
> and two fails with threads flavor.
solene, your update to sbcl-2.1.11 is ok gkoehler@
I packaged both flavors of 2.1.11 on powerpc.
quick followup
> [...]
>
>> Failure:unicode-misc.pure.lisp / (CL-CASE-INVERTIBILITY)
>
> (loop for i from 0 below char-code-limit
> for char = (code-char i)
> do
>(when (upper-case-p char)
> (assert (char= char (char-upcase (char-downcase char)
>
Solene Rapenne writes:
> On Thu, 16 Sep 2021 10:29:28 +0200
> Omar Polo :
>
>> Solene Rapenne writes:
>>
>> > this updates lang/sbcl to latest version, I didn't had reply for my
>> > previous mail for the 2.1.7 update
>> >
>> > tested on amd64, with and without threads
>> > stumpwm still works
On Thu, 16 Sep 2021 10:29:28 +0200
Omar Polo :
> Solene Rapenne writes:
>
> > this updates lang/sbcl to latest version, I didn't had reply for my
> > previous mail for the 2.1.7 update
> >
> > tested on amd64, with and without threads
> > stumpwm still works fine with it
>
> tested with my
Solene Rapenne writes:
> this updates lang/sbcl to latest version, I didn't had reply for my
> previous mail for the 2.1.7 update
>
> tested on amd64, with and without threads
> stumpwm still works fine with it
tested with my stumpwm config and tinmop (not in ports) and seems to
work fine;
this updates lang/sbcl to latest version, I didn't had reply for my
previous mail for the 2.1.7 update
tested on amd64, with and without threads
stumpwm still works fine with it
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file:
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 04:35:00PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2019/04/29 07:45, Josh Elsasser wrote:
> > -V =1.4.8
> > +V =1.5.1.401-ec954a7a7
> > DISTNAME= sbcl-${V}-source
> > PKGNAME= sbcl-${V}
> > WRKDIST=
On 2019/04/29 07:45, Josh Elsasser wrote:
> -V = 1.4.8
> +V = 1.5.1.401-ec954a7a7
> DISTNAME=sbcl-${V}-source
> PKGNAME= sbcl-${V}
> WRKDIST= ${WRKDIR}/sbcl-${V}
That results in a bogus PKGNAME (as if it had a "-ec954a7a7"
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 10:13:57AM +0200, Solene Rapenne wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 28, 2019 at 07:22:18AM -0700, Josh Elsasser wrote:
> > I'm preparing an update of lang/sbcl to 1.5.2, which should be
> > released in a day or two. Here is an update to a current git snapshot
> > if anyone wants to give
On Sun, Apr 28, 2019 at 07:22:18AM -0700, Josh Elsasser wrote:
> I'm preparing an update of lang/sbcl to 1.5.2, which should be
> released in a day or two. Here is an update to a current git snapshot
> if anyone wants to give it a try. I've already built and run the test
> suite on all three
I'm preparing an update of lang/sbcl to 1.5.2, which should be
released in a day or two. Here is an update to a current git snapshot
if anyone wants to give it a try. I've already built and run the test
suite on all three arches but more testing never hurts.
The port itself is once again patches
19 matches
Mail list logo
