Adding to the fluff -- even if it is twang related fluff -- Earle's still
married to wife #6. Y'all wouldn't want Earle to participate in bigamy, now
would ya?
It should also be noted that I'm still married to husband #1, and intend
to stay that way. That's why Steve Earle is my *former*
At 12:05 PM 4/6/99 -0700, you wrote:
Dave continues...
(fluff/nitpickery warning)
Dave P: As a fan of Ms. Hockeysticks's coinage, Steve Earle is her
"future former husband," not former future husband (which would
signify a waning interest or a broken
In a message dated 4/7/99 8:35:55 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Adding to the fluff -- even if it is twang related fluff -- Earle's still
married to wife #6. Y'all wouldn't want Earle to participate in bigamy, now
would ya?
Jeff
Ah bummer, I thought you were gonna share the story
(fluff/nitpickery warning)
Dave P: As a fan of Ms. Hockeysticks's coinage, Steve Earle is her
"future former husband," not former future husband (which would
signify a waning interest or a broken engagement...)
btw, when I mentioned this to a friend, she
Carl Wilson correcteth:
(fluff/nitpickery warning)
Dave P: As a fan of Ms. Hockeysticks's coinage, Steve Earle is her
"future former husband," not former future husband (which would
signify a waning interest or a broken engagement...)
Now that I'm thinking about
Dave continues...
(fluff/nitpickery warning)
Dave P: As a fan of Ms. Hockeysticks's coinage, Steve Earle is her
"future former husband," not former future husband (which would
signify a waning interest or a broken engagement...)
Now that I'm thinking about it,
