Hallo ram,
Op vrijdag 01 augustus 2008 schreef ram aan [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Occasionally external systems are tying to send mail with a
faked sender address via my system. So far no harm is done,
ad they have not been able to create a real user name. But
I would like to stop them before
On 8/4/2008, fajar ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
The following message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] was undeliverable.
The reason for the problem:
5.4.7 - Delivery expired (message too old) [Default] 451-'Sender verify
failed'
Why are you using sender verification? You should NOT use SAV for all
Hello,
I would like to whitelist a specific host, because it is currently
listed in the zen rbl, but I am unable to do so.
Here is a sample log of the rejected host connecting to my postfix:
Aug 4 14:17:17 petole postfix/smtpd[23545]: connect from
225.96.68-86.rev.gaoland.net[86.68.96.225]
Let me give this one a try... I *think* i see the problem...
On 8/4/2008, Nicolas KOWALSKI ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Aug 4 14:17:18 petole postfix/smtpd[23545]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT
from 225.96.68-86.rev.gaoland.net[86.68.96.225]: 554 5.7.1 Service
unavailable; Client host [86.68.96.225]
Hello Nicolas,
Try this:
Remove 'check_client_access hash:/etc/postfix/client_access' from
smtpd_recipient_restrictions. Add the following line in main.cf
somewhere before/above smtpd_recipient_restrictions:
smtpd_client_restrictions = hash:/etc/postfix/client_access
And make sure you
email builder wrote:
/usr/sbin/sendmail -- /etc/alternatives/mta -- /usr/sbin/sendmail.sendmail
First I just changed that last symlink to point to /usr/sbin/sendmail.postfix,
but when starting postfix I get:
postfix/postfix-script: warning: /usr/lib/sendmail and /usr/sbin/sendmail differ
Hi,
I need to be able to BOTH forward email and, optionally, deliver it
locally as well. I think I've gone about this wrong but it's easy to
change...
Everything is in ldap. I've been using virtual_alias_maps to hold the
forwarding information. What happens there though is that if it
On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 08:58:01AM -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
Let me give this one a try... I *think* i see the problem...
On 8/4/2008, Nicolas KOWALSKI ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Aug 4 14:17:18 petole postfix/smtpd[23545]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT
from
Nicolas KOWALSKI wrote:
On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 08:58:01AM -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
Let me give this one a try... I *think* i see the problem...
On 8/4/2008, Nicolas KOWALSKI ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Aug 4 14:17:18 petole postfix/smtpd[23545]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT
from
hi!
i am using postfixadmin with virtual vacation script and i have a little
problem here..
after set up virtual vacation as postfixadmin decribes i have actually
two kind of problems, first:
when i set virtual vacation the mailbox sends back one 'i am on
vacation' mail, but NOT
storing the
On 8/4/2008 11:00 AM, oxy wrote:
i am using postfixadmin with virtual vacation script and i have a
little problem here.. after set up virtual vacation as postfixadmin
decribes i have actually two kind of problems, first:
when i set virtual vacation the mailbox sends back one 'i am on
vacation'
you are right, thanks for your help, i am going to forward the mail to
that list..
i am saying that it works two other way and none of them are correct
Charles Marcus írta:
On 8/4/2008 11:00 AM, oxy wrote:
i am using postfixadmin with virtual vacation script and i have a
little problem here..
On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 10:56:36AM -0400, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
Nicolas KOWALSKI wrote:
On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 08:58:01AM -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 8/4/2008, Nicolas KOWALSKI ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Aug 4 14:17:18 petole postfix/smtpd[23545]: NOQUEUE: reject:
Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
Nicolas KOWALSKI wrote:
The client said 'EHLO demisel.dyndns.org'.
This is the value that check_helo_access can find, though somewhat
unreliable to whitelist.
I apparently have no other choices to whitelist-before-rbl such a
dynamic pool's host.
On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 12:29:34PM -0400, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
Nicolas KOWALSKI wrote:
The client said 'EHLO demisel.dyndns.org'.
This is the value that check_helo_access can find, though somewhat
unreliable to whitelist.
I apparently have no
On Monday, August 04, 2008 at 15:56 CEST,
Aaron Bennett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I need to be able to BOTH forward email and, optionally, deliver it
locally as well. I think I've gone about this wrong but it's easy to
change...
Everything is in ldap. I've been using
Nicolas KOWALSKI wrote:
On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 12:29:34PM -0400, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
A *better* way is force them to Authenticate using SASL.
See http://www.postfix.org/SASL_README.html
Postfix supports either Cyrus or Dovecot SASL.
P.S. This is if you fully trust and
Magnus Bäck wrote:
Set up an alias on the following form:
[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED]
In your LDAP map configuration this could translate to something like:
query_filter = mail=%s
result_attribute = mail, mailForwardingAddress
Does that go in
On Monday, August 04, 2008 at 20:49 CEST,
Aaron Bennett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Magnus Bäck wrote:
Set up an alias on the following form:
[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED]
In your LDAP map configuration this could translate to something like:
I'm attempting to map local_recipient_maps via a Pgsql query.
The database contains the username portion of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is there a way to append @example.com to the result of the lookup query?
--Jay
Magnus Bäck wrote:
Does that go in $alias_maps or $virtual_alias_maps?
This particular example is meant for virtual aliases, but if you adjust
it so that it expects the lookup key to be the bare username it'll work
with local aliases as well.
Thank you, that works.
On Mon, 4 Aug 2008, Jay Chandler wrote:
I'm attempting to map local_recipient_maps via a Pgsql query.
The database contains the username portion of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is there a way to append @example.com to the result of the lookup query?
I'm not familiar with Pgsql. However, MySQL has a
Why are you using sender verification? You should NOT use SAV for all
messages, only for messages destined to domains that you control or have
already gotten permission to do SAV for, or you WILL evenutally get
blacklisted.
Please post postconf -n output...
--
Best regards,
23 matches
Mail list logo
