Noel Jones wrote:
Mark Goodge wrote:
I'm hoping someone can help point me in the right direction for the
solution to this one. I'm in the process of adding a new server to an
existing mail cluster, but for some reason I'm getting really slow
throughput. The problem seems to be delays in the
Stefan Palme:
> Hi all,
>
> Our mail server is configured to use special envelope sender addresses
> for some outgoing mail so that bounces can be processed automatically.
>
> The "bounce processor" is a self-made script. Are there any hints what
> to look for in a bounced mail to be sure, that i
I'm setting up a postfix 2.3.3 mail server which is to be the primary
outgoing mail server and act as a secondary incoming mail server for
three domains (only one of which is of any real size).
I haven't used postfix before so I'm wading through the configuration
and documentation and without havi
On Fri, 2008-09-05 at 06:52 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Stefan Palme:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Our mail server is configured to use special envelope sender addresses
> > for some outgoing mail so that bounces can be processed automatically.
> >
> > The "bounce processor" is a self-made script. Are t
On 9/5/2008, Paul Cocker ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I'm setting up a postfix 2.3.3 mail server
Why use something so old if you're setting up a new server?
--
Best regards,
Charles
Actually I do believe I have misunderstood the nature of mydestination,
by putting my domain in there I think I'll stop the e-mail chain dead.
Whoops.
http://www.postfix.org/STANDARD_CONFIGURATION_README.html#firewall
That appears to be the sort of thing I am looking for, wish I'd seen it
before
It's CentOS 5.2, it's the version in the repository. It's not a bleeding
edge distribution, but with seven years patching it doesn't aim to be.
Paul Cocker
Systems Infrastructure Support
Network Administrator and Security Specialist
-Original Message-
From: Charles Marcus [mailto:[EMAIL
Stefan Palme wrote:
On Fri, 2008-09-05 at 06:52 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
Stefan Palme:
Hi all,
Our mail server is configured to use special envelope sender addresses
for some outgoing mail so that bounces can be processed automatically.
The "bounce processor" is a self-made script. Are the
I'm running through the e-mail gateway example at postfix.org as this
appears to be what I'm looking for, a setup which passes e-mail on for
valid domains.
It talks about using transport_map and defining the inside smtp
gateway... My knowledge on proper handling of this is pretty dicey but
as I un
And it's dealt with further down the page.
My apologies for crying wolf a little too quickly.
Paul Cocker
-Original Message-
From: Paul Cocker
Sent: 05 September 2008 12:37
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Transport_map as second MX server
I'm running through the e-mail
Victor Duchovni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Woops, sorry for the noise; maybe the following variant, if the OP
> > wants to HOLD messages in the active queue:
> >
> > % mailq | grep sender | cut -d \* -f 1 | postsuper -h -
>
> Not all the messages will be in the active queue, so "*" is not
>
Paul Cocker wrote:
I'm setting up a postfix 2.3.3 mail server which is to be the primary
outgoing mail server and act as a secondary incoming mail server for
three domains (only one of which is of any real size).
I haven't used postfix before so I'm wading through the configuration
and documenta
On Fri, Sep 05, 2008 at 07:46:53AM -0400, Sahil Tandon wrote:
> Victor Duchovni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Woops, sorry for the noise; maybe the following variant, if the OP
> > > wants to HOLD messages in the active queue:
> > >
> > > % mailq | grep sender | cut -d \* -f 1 | postsuper
Stefan Palme:
> On Fri, 2008-09-05 at 06:52 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Stefan Palme:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Our mail server is configured to use special envelope sender addresses
> > > for some outgoing mail so that bounces can be processed automatically.
> > >
> > > The "bounce processor
2008/9/4 Noel Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> James Robertson wrote:
>>
>> We have a client who has done a mailout which adds up to over 1GB in size.
>>
>> ..
>> 1160910 Kbytes in 988 Requests
>> ..
>>
>> Is there a way I can slow down or throttle the speed at which email is
>> being sent from
Juan Miscaro:
> > Postfix doesn't have any per-user rate controls (some add-on policy services
> > can do per-user input rate limits), and output rate controls are limited to
> > what's available with
> > http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#default_destination_rate_delay
> > which is a per-desti
Hi,
This is first time I use this mailing-list, so please let me know if I do
anything wrong.
My problem is that I want to send bounced messages to an different mail
address than the mail-address in the MAIL FROM: field.
I have searched a lot on internet but can't find any good solutions o
With an ever changing list of over 600 e-mail addresses, manually
maintaining relay_recepient_maps doesn't strike me as appealing, or
practical.
Unsurprisingly we have an AD back-end, is there any way for the two to
communicate? I see this as being the only practical way to check valid
recipients,
> With an ever changing list of over 600 e-mail addresses, manually
> maintaining relay_recepient_maps doesn't strike me as appealing, or
> practical.
>
> Unsurprisingly we have an AD back-end, is there any way for the two to
> communicate? I see this as being the only practical way to check valid
Joakim Ohlsson:
> Hi,
>
> This is first time I use this mailing-list, so please let me know if I do
> anything wrong.
>
> My problem is that I want to send bounced messages to an different mail
> address than the mail-address in the MAIL FROM: field.
This is by definition (i.e. RFC 821 and RFC 282
Juan Miscaro schrieb:
James Robertson wrote:
>>
Maybe router or firewall based traffic shaping would help - at least you
could prevent SMTP from hogging all the bandwidth.
That's an interesting option. How would Postfix react to saturated
bandwidth? Will it simply defer messages and try aga
Hello,
I have implemented the "recipient_relay_map" in main.cf, and have my
email server & gateway automatically building a fresh recipient hash
every hour.. yet, it doesnt work. If I create an account on my internal
email server, and dont put that address in my hash, the account can still
rece
> Hi,
>
> This is first time I use this mailing-list, so please let me know if I do
> anything wrong.
>
> My problem is that I want to send bounced messages to an different mail
> address than the mail-address in the MAIL FROM: field.
This is by definition (i.e. RFC 821 and RFC 2821) the address
w
We are currently receiving lots of password phishing mails with envelope
sender and From: header
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and Reply-To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The connecting mail servers
que41.charter.net[209.225.8.24]
que51.charter.net[209.225.8.25]
do apparently *not* stop re-connecting after receiving R
Amaru Netapshaak wrote:
Hello,
I have implemented the "recipient_relay_map" in main.cf, and have my
email server & gateway automatically building a fresh recipient hash
every hour.. yet, it doesnt work. If I create an account on my internal
email server, and dont put that address in my hash,
On Fri, Sep 05, 2008 at 12:00:26PM -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
> >mydestination = $myhostname, XXX.com, localhost, localhost.$mydomain
> >relay_domains = hash:/etc/postfix/relay_domains
> >relay_recipient_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/relay_recipients
> >
> >My instinct tells me this has something to do w
On 9/5/2008 12:46 PM, Joakim Ohlsson wrote:
>>> This is first time I use this mailing-list, so please let me know if I do
>>> anything wrong.
>>>
>>> My problem is that I want to send bounced messages to an different mail
>>> address than the mail-address in the MAIL FROM: field.
>> This is by def
Joakim Ohlsson wrote:
My problem is that I want to receive bounced messages to a different
mail-address than the address in MAIL FROM: field. Is this even possible? As
I understand this was possible in earlier versions of Postfix but is this
possible in Postfix 2.3? Or can this be done in the ma
On Fri, 2008-09-05 at 14:56 +0100, Paul Cocker wrote:
> With an ever changing list of over 600 e-mail addresses, manually
> maintaining relay_recepient_maps doesn't strike me as appealing, or
> practical.
> Unsurprisingly we have an AD back-end, is there any way for the two to
> communicate?
Sure,
Joakim Ohlsson:
> > Hi,
> >
> > This is first time I use this mailing-list, so please let me know if I do
> > anything wrong.
> >
> > My problem is that I want to send bounced messages to an different mail
> > address than the mail-address in the MAIL FROM: field.
>
> This is by definition (i.e. R
On Fri, Sep 05, 2008 at 01:39:41PM +0200, mouss wrote:
> - try to parse your postfix logs for invalid addresses.
> This way, you can ignore bounces
Why do you want to pull data you normally get pushed free house?
Bastian
--
We Klingons believe as you do -- the sick should die. Only the strong
Bastian Blank wrote:
On Fri, Sep 05, 2008 at 01:39:41PM +0200, mouss wrote:
- try to parse your postfix logs for invalid addresses.
This way, you can ignore bounces
Why do you want to pull data you normally get pushed free house?
because parsing the logs is trivial compared to parsing a mes
mouss:
> Bastian Blank wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 05, 2008 at 01:39:41PM +0200, mouss wrote:
> >> - try to parse your postfix logs for invalid addresses.
> >> This way, you can ignore bounces
> >
> > Why do you want to pull data you normally get pushed free house?
>
>
> because parsing the logs is t
Dear
I have a problem with postfix understanding and "virtual_mailbox_maps"
parameter :
in my example i would like to send email to a local mailbox created has
"dtouzeau" from email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
currently, postfix want to send email to user.david^t instead dtouzeau
If i undertsand the
Victor Duchovni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Not all the messages will be in the active queue, so "*" is not
> > > the right delimeter.
> >
> > This is why, above, I wrote _if_ the OP wants to HOLD messages in the
> > _active_ queue.
>
> Better tools than cut have been posted before. Piping
Sahil Tandon:
> Victor Duchovni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > Not all the messages will be in the active queue, so "*" is not
> > > > the right delimeter.
> > >
> > > This is why, above, I wrote _if_ the OP wants to HOLD messages in the
> > > _active_ queue.
> >
> > Better tools than cut
On Fri, Sep 05, 2008 at 07:41:25PM -0400, Sahil Tandon wrote:
> Victor Duchovni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > Not all the messages will be in the active queue, so "*" is not
> > > > the right delimeter.
> > >
> > > This is why, above, I wrote _if_ the OP wants to HOLD messages in the
> >
Erik Paulsen Skaalerud wrote:
The weird part: EHLO doesnt mention AUTH at all, but if I type "AUTH
LOGIN" it responds with "334 VXNlcm5hbWU6", AUTH PLAIN and AUTH
CRAM-MD5 also responds with similar challenges.
Interesting. I have the same 'issue' on my home server; AUTH is not
advertised wh
DJ Lucas:
> Erik Paulsen Skaalerud wrote:
> > The weird part: EHLO doesnt mention AUTH at all, but if I type "AUTH
> > LOGIN" it responds with "334 VXNlcm5hbWU6", AUTH PLAIN and AUTH
> > CRAM-MD5 also responds with similar challenges.
> >
> Interesting. I have the same 'issue' on my home server
DJ Lucas:
> Erik Paulsen Skaalerud wrote:
> > The weird part: EHLO doesnt mention AUTH at all, but if I type "AUTH
> > LOGIN" it responds with "334 VXNlcm5hbWU6", AUTH PLAIN and AUTH
> > CRAM-MD5 also responds with similar challenges.
> >
> Interesting. I have the same 'issue' on my home server
Hi guys,
I have just started recieving emails from postfix telling me that there is a
Temporary lookup failure.
*
Subject: Postfix SMTP server: errors from
adsl190-28-1-167.epm.net.co[190.28.1.167]
Out: 220 mailserver.mydomain.tld ESMTP Postfix (Debian/GNU)
In: HELO equipo34
Out: 250 ma
Hungry Snail:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> I have just started recieving emails from postfix telling me that there is a
> Temporary lookup failure.
>
>
> *
> Subject: Postfix SMTP server: errors from
> adsl190-28-1-167.epm.net.co[190.28.1.167]
> Out: 220 mailserver.mydomain.tld ESMTP Postfix (Debian
Wietse Venema <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > How is the output of cut in last example "garbage"?
>
> The queueID string length depends on the file system.
Yep, the first example was wrong, but the revised version extracts
queueIDs of any length from the active queue. Another example that would
Hi
I have strange problem i can send and receive mails outside my domains but
not locally
main.cf
alias_database = hash:/etc/aliases
alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases
command_directory = /usr/sbin
config_directory = /etc/postfix
daemon_directory = /usr/libexec/postfix
debug_peer_level = 2
html_dir
Hello;
I am in search for a way to graph my logs on four separate mailservers,
since all four are logging onto the same syslog-ng host,
I figured I'd use mailgraph, a tool which creates graphs using RRDtools.
I got rrdtools installed and ran mailgraph, and after not recieving any graph
data i
Victor Duchovni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > How is the output of cut in last example "garbage"?
>
> What do you see when you run:
>
> mailq | cut -d '*' -f 1 | less
That is not what I wrote; one has to grep for the sender address first,
pass the resulting lines to cut and then pipe to
pascual dsouza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sep 6 06:40:12 mails postfix/smtp[2874]: connect to
> coreteamsolutions.in[192.168.1.99]: Connection refused (port 25)
Can you connect to 192.168.1.99 on port 25 (say, with telnet) from the
same machine that is logging those errors? I am able to
Hi All,
Recently i implemented the sender check. First i made a split for the
processing and put some restrictions under smtpd_sender_restrictions and
some under stmpd_recipient_restrictions.
This resulted in too many rejections, so i left the sender restrictions
emtpy and put all under the
TOUZEAU DAVID wrote:
Dear
I have a problem with postfix understanding and "virtual_mailbox_maps"
parameter :
in my example i would like to send email to a local mailbox created has
"dtouzeau" from email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
currently, postfix want to send email to user.david^t instead dtouzea
49 matches
Mail list logo
