Hello,
I am installing a new server with SuSE Linux Enterprise SP2 and want to
use the SuSE mail repository.
http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/server:/mail/SLE_10/x86_64/?C=M;O=D
They offer a postfix24-2.4.5-1.1.x86_64.rpm which seems to be quite old
from August 2007 and even
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alexander Grüner
Sent: Monday, 8 December 2008 7:16 PM
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: SuSE repository - old postfix ?
Hello,
I am installing a new server with SuSE Linux Enterprise SP2
Open SUSE includes more recent posfix rpms (but in the factory not
the repos):
http://download.opensuse.org/factory/repo/oss/suse/x86_64/postfix-2.5.5-6.6.x86_64.rpm
http://download.opensuse.org/factory/repo/oss/suse/i586/postfix-2.5.5-6.5.i586.rpm
Obviously, there may be dependencies you
Spahn, Daniel wrote:
My setup is using the defaults, but the connection is so flaky that even pings
don't return consistently. My current setup no longer delivers mail, but I get
lots of timeout errors, and it looks like most messages end up in the defer
queue. Any ideas? This is a highly
Sorry, I should've checked the archives first. I've found
http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/postfix/2008-11/0337.html, I'll
come back if necessary.
Please excuse my previous post.
Cheers,
Tobias
Hi
Is it possible to perform a check to see if envelope sender and envelope
recipient are identical (and within a specific domain or, even better,
within a list, e.g. relay_recipients) with postfix check_mumble_access
rules? Following Ralf's hints at www.arschkrebs.de, I can chain sender
and
Hello,
how can I have an e-mail account to which when people send e-mail messages then
they are kept in this account and also forwarded to some other accounts?
In other words:
There is an e-mail account [EMAIL PROTECTED] Someone uses this account for
sending / receiving e-mails. But it is
NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 3671 (20081208) __
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 3671 (20081208) __
The message was checked
mouss ha scritto:
can you show the contents of transport_maps?
And the content of alias map? As far as I can remember I had a similar
error and IU had made two mistakes:
1) listed in transport the domain and the destination;
2) no alias set in aliases;
And last but not least, there was no
Greetings,
We run Postfox (postfix-2.3.3-2.pcre.sasl2.rhel4) and MailScanner
(mailscanner-4.66.5-3)
together. A user reported that he lost a message. I checked into our log
and found 4 entries
about the message, all from postfix.
Dec 7 16:04:47 smtp2 postfix/smtpd[12441]: connect from
On Mon, Dec 08, 2008 at 09:23:14AM -0700, Kai Wang wrote:
We run Postfox (postfix-2.3.3-2.pcre.sasl2.rhel4) and MailScanner
(mailscanner-4.66.5-3)
together.
Mailscanner is expressly unsupported here, it misuses undocumented
Postfix interfaces and queue-file formats.
A user reported that he
Kai Wang:
Greetings,
We run Postfox (postfix-2.3.3-2.pcre.sasl2.rhel4) and MailScanner
(mailscanner-4.66.5-3)
together. A user reported that he lost a message. I checked into our log
and found 4 entries
about the message, all from postfix.
Dec 7 16:04:47 smtp2 postfix/smtpd[12441]:
Hi,
I have a postfix gateway sending mails to accounts on different backend
systems and to local maildirs for imap. But the destination of an email
should depend from the single recipient address not from the complete
destination domain.
I'll try to explain it with my testdomain
Miguel Angel Cañedo wrote:
Hi I have set up my postfix server:
Every SMTP connection from evolution works.
Every SMTP connection from Outlook fails (smtp authentication is marked)
they get 554 5.7.1 some IP: Client host rejected. Access denied.
This is driving me nuts, any help will be grat,
Hello:
Over a year ago, I installed a CentOS 5.2 with Postfix
2:2.3..3-2.1 (and Dovecot) on a Server. Postfix ran without a problem did
not do anything for 18 months.
Couple of weeks ago, I lost the P/S in the Server. I took
the MB and installed it into another Server. I changed the IP
Daniel Funke wrote:
Hi,
I have a postfix gateway sending mails to accounts on different
backend systems and to local maildirs for imap. But the destination of
an email should depend from the single recipient address not from the
complete destination domain.
I'll try to explain it with my
Alexander Grüner wrote:
Open SUSE includes more recent posfix rpms (but in the factory not
the repos):
http://download.opensuse.org/factory/repo/oss/suse/x86_64/postfix-2.5.5-6.6.x86_64.rpm
http://download.opensuse.org/factory/repo/oss/suse/i586/postfix-2.5.5-6.5.i586.rpm
Obviously,
Kirt Bajwa wrote:
Hello:
Over a year ago, I installed a CentOS 5.2 with Postfix 2:2..3.3-2.1
(and Dovecot) on a Server. Postfix ran without a problem did not do
anything for 18 months.
Couple of weeks ago, I lost the P/S in the Server. I took the MB and
installed it into another
Did you change the MX record to point to the new server?
Do you show anything in the logs, rejections? Did you open your firewall for
the new IP?
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kirt Bajwa
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2008 11:58 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
El lun, 08-12-2008 a las 11:45 -0600, J.P. Trosclair escribió:
Miguel Angel Cañedo wrote:
Hi I have set up my postfix server:
Every SMTP connection from evolution works.
Every SMTP connection from Outlook fails (smtp authentication is marked)
they get 554 5.7.1 some IP: Client host
My previous post should have said Hard Disk Drive (HDD) instead of Motherboard
(MB). I am reposting. Sorry.
From: Kirt Bajwa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 8, 2008 10:57:54 AM
Subject: Can't Receive emails!
Hello:
Over a
Hi,
Korreio is a GUI to mail management with support to LDAP, CYRUS and
POSTFIX. It is a free software hosted on http://korreio.sf.net. (Now
available in English)
It has some integrated modules:
- LDAP management to add, modify and delete entries with many
facilities including Password Change
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm a profoundly low-volume mailer, so there's no way I'm cut off for
traffic. And I'm not a spammer.
But spamassassin has been checking with zen for 2 or 3 years now, and
this morning I noticed bind saying it was getting too many timeouts from
Can you 'telnet localhost 25' on that box?
YES
Can you telnet to the box on the same network?
YES
Is SELinux or AppArmor installed?
SELinux is installed (as part of CentOS installation) but is DISABLED.
Is there a general smtp service entry in master.cf?
No idea what to look for! Please give
subbia Cavallaro
__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 3671 (20081208) __
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 3672
I think the problem is with Qwest DSL blocking the incoming mail. I have reset
the DSL modem and did receive one email. I am hoping that it is working. THANKS
to all.
Mark A. Olbert a écrit :
Log info:
Dec 8 07:03:23 wiggle_butt postfix/pickup[13057]: 132802741F3: uid=0
from=root
Dec 8 07:03:23 wiggle_butt postfix/cleanup[13064]: 132802741F3:
message-id=[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dec 8 07:03:23 wiggle_butt postfix/qmgr[13058]: 132802741F3: from=[EMAIL
On Mon, December 8, 2008 12:41 pm, Kirt Bajwa wrote:
Can you 'telnet localhost 25' on that box?
YES
Can you telnet to the box on the same network?
YES
Is SELinux or AppArmor installed?
SELinux is installed (as part of CentOS installation) but is DISABLED.
Is there a general smtp
Kirt Bajwa wrote:
My previous post should have said Hard Disk Drive (HDD) instead of
Motherboard (MB). I am reposting. Sorry.
*From:* Kirt Bajwa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*To:* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*Sent:* Monday, December 8, 2008
Hey All,
I'm having an issue with backscatter emails and implementing a
before-queue spam and virus scanner. My current mail server uses a
after-queue amavisd-new scanner with spamassassin and clamav. In the
last two weeks, my system has started *sending* a significant number of
Jakub Nadolny a écrit :
Hello,
how can I have an e-mail account to which when people send e-mail messages
then
they are kept in this account and also forwarded to some other accounts?
In other words:
There is an e-mail account [EMAIL PROTECTED] Someone uses this account for
sending /
ghe wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm a profoundly low-volume mailer, so there's no way I'm cut off for
traffic. And I'm not a spammer.
Being cut off from DNS queries is not based on how much you send, but on how
much you use the DNS query service. See
Chris Turan wrote:
Hey All,
I'm having an issue with backscatter emails and implementing a
before-queue spam and virus scanner. My current mail server uses a
after-queue amavisd-new scanner with spamassassin and clamav. In the
last two weeks, my system has started *sending* a significant
Chris Turan wrote:
Hey All,
I'm having an issue with backscatter emails and implementing a
before-queue spam and virus scanner. My current mail server uses a
after-queue amavisd-new scanner with spamassassin and clamav. In the
last two weeks, my system has started *sending* a significant
Noel Jones wrote:
You need to configure postfix to reject unknown recipients during SMTP.
Switching to something other than amavisd-new and/or switching to a
before-queue filter won't help that.
Hey Noel. I actually am rejecting unknown recipients. I wrote some
software to refresh the
Terry Carmen wrote:
To eliminate *sending* backscatter, all you need to do is not accept
mail you won't be able to deliver:
I am rejecting unknown recipients but the bounces are coming from
messages with a spamassassin score above 12.
Unfortunately, there's still no such thing as a free
On Mon, Dec 08, 2008 at 12:28:22PM -0800, Daniel V. Reinhardt wrote:
- Original Message
From: Tolga [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Sent: Monday, December 8, 2008 8:26:25 PM
Subject: Relay access denied
Hi,
When I try to send mail, I get 5.7.1
On Mon, Dec 08, 2008 at 02:29:51PM -0600, J.P. Trosclair wrote:
Tolga wrote:
Hi,
When I try to send mail, I get 5.7.1 Relay access denied. Although I
don't get this when I send mail with mutt, I am wondering if this is a
Postfix issue. If not, can you redirect me?
Regards,
mto
Sounds
Tolga wrote:
On Mon, Dec 08, 2008 at 02:29:51PM -0600, J.P. Trosclair wrote:
Tolga wrote:
Hi,
When I try to send mail, I get 5.7.1 Relay access denied. Although I
don't get this when I send mail with mutt, I am wondering if this is a
Postfix issue. If not, can you redirect me?
Regards,
I read now the thread in the archive and tried to apply the proposed
solution. I'm still getting the same amount of spam mails where
sender=receiver. My settings look like this:
disable_vrfy_command = yes
smtpd_helo_required = yes
smtpd_helo_restrictions =
permit_mynetworks,
J.P. Trosclair yazmış:
Tolga wrote:
On Mon, Dec 08, 2008 at 02:29:51PM -0600, J.P. Trosclair wrote:
Tolga wrote:
Hi,
When I try to send mail, I get 5.7.1 Relay access denied. Although
I don't get this when I send mail with mutt, I am wondering if this
is a Postfix issue. If not, can you
On Mon, Dec 08, 2008 at 03:13:57PM -0600, Noel Jones wrote:
If you want to investigate setting up amavisd-new as a pre-queue filter,
general instructions are here:
http://www.postfix.org/SMTPD_PROXY_README.html
More specific instructions can likely be found in the archives of the
Chris Turan wrote:
Terry Carmen wrote:
To eliminate *sending* backscatter, all you need to do is not accept
mail you won't be able to deliver:
I am rejecting unknown recipients but the bounces are coming from
messages with a spamassassin score above 12.
Don't do that.
Once you've accepted
Chris Turan wrote:
Noel Jones wrote:
amavisd-new meets all your criteria, providing you configure it to
tag+deliver mail rather than bounce.
Well, I also have it set to bounce messages with a spamassassin score
above 12. Turning that off and just delivering everything with
tagging *could*
mail_version = 2.5.5
mail_release_date = 20080902
Last week I worked for some hours to resolve a problem receiving mail from
puremail.com. I have a short term workaround now, but for the long term I
want to understand the problem and obviate the need for the workaround.
The mail from
Michael Brennen:
The mail from puremail was sent from ip address 66.81.101.50, which reverses
to 'mx.puremail.com'. A forward lookup on 'mx.puremail.com' results in a
truncated DNS result and TCP retry, returning 23 ip addresses.
From the remote end's view the 220 return message is
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Turan
Sent: Tuesday, 9 December 2008 7:39 AM
To: Terry Carmen
Cc: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: Stopping backscatter with before-queue
Terry Carmen wrote:
To eliminate *sending*
Bill Cole a écrit :
ghe wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm a profoundly low-volume mailer, so there's no way I'm cut off for
traffic. And I'm not a spammer.
Being cut off from DNS queries is not based on how much you send, but on
how much you use the DNS query
On Monday 08 December 2008, Wietse Venema wrote:
Michael Brennen:
The mail from puremail was sent from ip address 66.81.101.50, which
reverses to 'mx.puremail.com'. A forward lookup on 'mx.puremail.com'
results in a truncated DNS result and TCP retry, returning 23 ip
addresses.
From
Terry Carmen wrote:
Don't do that. Once you've accepted a message, it's yours. Aside from
anything else, it makes you look bad when someone sends a legitimate
email that happens to look spammy and you bounce it back as spam.
Right, I'm trying to correct that problem. This wasn't much of an
Corey Chandler wrote:
Tough-- you're really creating your own misery here. You MUST either
reject at the gateway, or accept the traffic without sending a
bounce. You can delete silently if you trust your filters, but given
that the vast majority of spam has a forged From: header, you're
Chris Turan wrote:
Ouch, but you're right. I am creating my own misery. It wasn't a
problem before when I was unknown to the spammers. Its only been a
problem for a few weeks and I haven't yet been put on any blacklists.
Keep sending out backscatter spam, and you will most certainly end up
J Sloan wrote:
Keep sending out backscatter spam, and you will most certainly end up on
blacklists.
I think you might have misread my intention. I definitely don't want to
continue sending backscatter. Per another suggestion on the list, I
made a change that stopped all of my backscatter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alexander Grüner さんは書きました:
| Hello,
|
| I am installing a new server with SuSE Linux Enterprise SP2 and want to
| use the SuSE mail repository.
|
|
http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/server:/mail/SLE_10/x86_64/?C=M;O=D
|
|
| They offer a
Chris Turan wrote:
Terry Carmen wrote:
Don't do that. Once you've accepted a message, it's yours. Aside from
anything else, it makes you look bad when someone sends a legitimate
email that happens to look spammy and you bounce it back as spam.
Right, I'm trying to correct that problem. This
55 matches
Mail list logo
