validating recipients on gateway

Hi, I've got two gateway servers running postfix in front of the main mail servers and I want to start only accepting mail for valid recipients. From what I've read, adding check_recipient_access to my smtpd_recipient_restrictions the best way of doing this. In hash terms the file would look

Re: Domain emails from outside

Hi, I'm grateful to all of you that helped me to solve this problem. The check_sender_access on smtpd_sender_restrictions including my domain with REJECT solved my problem completely as all my clients connect using SASL. So I permited_sasl and then I rejected my domain from outside with

Re: validating recipients on gateway

Guy a écrit : Hi, I've got two gateway servers running postfix in front of the main mail servers and I want to start only accepting mail for valid recipients. From what I've read, adding check_recipient_access to my smtpd_recipient_restrictions the best way of doing this. In hash terms

multiple virtual ip's bind to outgoing mails

Hi i am searching for a solution where we can install postfix in a multi-IP environment, With the followin this tutorial i am able to install two instances of postfix http://souptonuts.sourceforge.net/postfix_sbr.html smtpd is listening on eth0 192.168.1.200 port 25 but i need to send mail

Re: multiple virtual ip's bind to outgoing mails

On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 5:58 PM, Wietse Venema [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Agnello George: how do i tell postfix to send mail out using multiple ips ( 192.168.1.201to 192.168.1.206 )... is there a way to tell postfix to rotate the use of these ip's. in sending out mails . No. If you want

Re: multiple virtual ip's bind to outgoing mails

On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 6:09 PM, Agnello George [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 5:58 PM, Wietse Venema [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: Agnello George: how do i tell postfix to send mail out using multiple ips ( 192.168.1.201to 192.168.1.206 )... is there a way to tell postfix to

Re: multiple virtual ip's bind to outgoing mails

Agnello George: On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 5:58 PM, Wietse Venema [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Agnello George: how do i tell postfix to send mail out using multiple ips ( 192.168.1.201to 192.168.1.206 )... is there a way to tell postfix to rotate the use of these ip's. in sending out

Re: SuSE repository - old postfix ?

There is a SuSE build service for Postfix. I can't check it at the moment but it sould be in the list of community repositories. It is usually a little closer to the current stable release than the other repositories. The only one I know of is:

Re: multiple virtual ip's bind to outgoing mails

Agnello George: how do i tell postfix to send mail out using multiple ips ( 192.168.1.201to 192.168.1.206 )... is there a way to tell postfix to rotate the use of these ip's. in sending out mails . No. If you want multiple IP addresses, Postfix lets the kernel choose. Wietse

Re: multiple virtual ip's bind to outgoing mails

Agnello George a écrit : On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 5:58 PM, Wietse Venema [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Agnello George: how do i tell postfix to send mail out using multiple ips ( 192.168.1.201to 192.168.1.206 http://192.168.1.206 )... is there a

Transitive Closure for Whole Domain Mapping

With: virtual_alias_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/virtual and: /etc/postfix/virtual: ... domainA.com domainA.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailboxForUser1-A [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailboxForUser2-A domainB.com domainB.com @domainB.com @domainA.com Doing: # telnet

Re: Transitive Closure for Whole Domain Mapping

On 12/9/2008 11:38 AM, Fat Bear Mail Services wrote: With: virtual_alias_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/virtual and: /etc/postfix/virtual: ... domainA.com domainA.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailboxForUser1-A [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailboxForUser2-A

Re: SuSE repository - old postfix ?

Alexander Grüner schrieb: There is a SuSE build service for Postfix. I can't check it at the moment but it sould be in the list of community repositories. It is usually a little closer to the current stable release than the other repositories. The only one I know of is:

Re: Transitive Closure for Whole Domain Mapping

[plain text only please] Fat Bear Mail Services wrote: With: virtual_alias_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/virtual and: /etc/postfix/virtual: ... domainA.com domainA.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailboxForUser1-A [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailboxForUser2-A domainB.com

mailman integration question

as it is and not as it should be. __ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 3677 (20081209) __ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com

Re: mailman integration question

Mark A. Olbert a écrit : Thanks to mouss and others for helping me figure out how to configure postfix and amavisd to route mail to different endpoints based on whether the address is in a subdomain. I'm running into a GID problem in the interface between mailman and postfix. Here's the

Re: SuSE repository - old postfix ?

J Sloan: Alexander Gr_ner wrote: Open SUSE includes more recent posfix rpms (but in the factory not the repos): http://download.opensuse.org/factory/repo/oss/suse/x86_64/postfix-2.5.5-6.6.x86_64.rpm http://download.opensuse.org/factory/repo/oss/suse/i586/postfix-2.5.5-6.5.i586.rpm

Re: Transitive Closure for Whole Domain Mapping

On 12/9/2008, Steve Amerige ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: gives an undesired 250 status for the unknown [EMAIL PROTECTED] Is there a way to configure Postfix, leaving the file /etc/postfix virtual unchanged, so that the response to an unknown user via a whole-domain mapping results in a 550

RE: mailman integration question

__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 3678 (20081209) __ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com __ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 3678 (20081209

Re: mailman integration question

Wietse Venema: Mark A. Olbert: That's what I did, but it didn't work. Nor did chgrp nogroup. Postfix does not use the group of the aliases file. You may have to re-compile mailman so it expects the right group. To clarify, Postfix uses the UID of the file owner, then it looks in the

Exempting recipients from header_checks

Hello, I currently use a small handful of header checks to help drop some mail before it reaches SpamAssassin, but I'd like to exempt mail to postmaster from these checks. Is there any place in the mumble_restrictions processing I can throw an 'OK' to avoid running header checks? I'm guessing

Re: Exempting recipients from header_checks

Ben Winslow wrote: Hello, I currently use a small handful of header checks to help drop some mail before it reaches SpamAssassin, but I'd like to exempt mail to postmaster from these checks. Is there any place in the mumble_restrictions processing I can throw an 'OK' to avoid running header

two account with same emails

Hi I have necessity to copy incoming mail of a user to another user. I have used .procmailrc and .forward but i have problems. How can i make? Is it possible to save also outgoing mail? Vuoi essere presente online? Vuoi

two account with same emails

Hi I have necessity to copy incoming mail of a user to another user. I have used .procmailrc and .forward but i have problems. How can i make? Is it possible to save also outgoing mail? Vuoi essere presente online? Vuoi

Re: One domain used by virtual_alias_maps AND transport_maps?

Hi Brian and others, thank you, for your answer. I think, you're right, but does this mean, there is no possibility to have different destinations (some lokal and some relayed to other servers) for different mailaddresses in the same domain? Bye, Daniel Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:

Re: fight spam problem: sender equal to receiver

** Sorry, send to the previous poster instead of the list... ** I'm not a fan of mailing lists because of things ** like this U.=.U No idea which log snippets you want to see but the postconf -n one I can give already alias_database = hash:/etc/mail/aliases alias_maps = hash:/etc/mail/aliases

Re: One domain used by virtual_alias_maps AND transport_maps?

Daniel Funke: Hi Brian and others, thank you, for your answer. I think, you're right, but does this mean, there is no possibility to have different destinations (some lokal and some relayed to other servers) for different mailaddresses in the same domain? List the domain in the class

Re: two account with same emails

hi It's ossible with sender_bcc In /etc/postfix/main.cf add : sender_bcc_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/sender_bcc Then edit or create /etc/postfix/sender_bcc in the following format : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] and run postmap /etc/postfix/sender_bcc and posfix reload. Bye Stan HiI

Re: Re: two account with same emails

Many thanks[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] can be local user???I have two localuser; user1 and user2.I have to crate a sender_bcc like this:user1 user2This solution copy outgoing and incoming mail???ByehiIt's ossible with sender_bccIn /etc/postfix/main.cfadd :sender_bcc_maps =

Re: Re: two account with same emails

no all the message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] to user1 , with sender_bcc there is a copy to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (user2), it's ok? with no [EMAIL PROTECTED] user1 with sender_bcc [EMAIL PROTECTED] user1 and [EMAIL PROTECTED] user2 Many thanks [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[SOLVED] OT: no response from spamhaus

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 ghe wrote: this morning I noticed bind saying it was getting too many timeouts from spamhaus. Now the host command (from here and from another domain) gets no response -- just a timeout, not even an error. host zen.spamhaus.org will never work:

content filter + milter issue

Hi, I was wondering if anyone had some suggestions on how to deal with an issue we're seeing when having both a content filter and a before-queue milter in place with postfix. Right now, we run through amavis as our content filter: main.cf: content_filter = smtp-amavis:[127.0.0.1]:10024

Re: Stopping backscatter with before-queue

Thank you to everyone. I'm getting some great suggestions. I didn't know about several of the features postfix provides and have been relying mostly on spamassassin to do the work for me. I don't see the smtpd_*_restrictions. Sensible ones there cut down on acres of spam and take load off

Re: Stopping backscatter with before-queue

Chris Turan wrote: Thank you to everyone. I'm getting some great suggestions. I didn't know about several of the features postfix provides and have been relying mostly on spamassassin to do the work for me. I don't see the smtpd_*_restrictions. Sensible ones there cut down on acres of spam

Block user sending email to domain

Hi All, I want to block [EMAIL PROTECTED] to domain1.com , but [EMAIL PROTECTED] can send email to domain1.com, I have try using header_checks IF /^To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]/ /^From:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ REJECT ENDIF But it didn't work well email from [EMAIL PROTECTED] can sending to domain1.com [EMAIL

Re: Block user sending email to domain

On Wed, December 10, 2008 7:57 am, Budiono U. said: I want to block [EMAIL PROTECTED] to domain1.com , but [EMAIL PROTECTED] can send email to domain1.com, I have try using header_checks IF /^To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]/ /^From:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ REJECT ENDIF As documented, header_checks looks

Re: fight spam problem: sender equal to receiver

Roland Plüss a écrit : ** Sorry, send to the previous poster instead of the list... ** I'm not a fan of mailing lists because of things ** like this U.=.U No idea which log snippets you want to see but the postconf -n one I can give already a copy of the headers of one spam would be more