Zitat von Andres Vergara :
Hello there, list
I'm setting up a new mailserver (postfix -> amavisd-new ->
postfix) for a company and while debugging (smtpd -v,
trivial-rewrite -v) i've noticed this
Feb 27 02:14:06 sandbox postfix/smtp[5700]: D95C920175B:
to=,
relay=pop3.0x.com.ar
Thanks Sahil for your precious answer,
> > I'm trying to use a policy service to limit use of my SMTP gateway
> > platform 'cause of heavy load that usually means hard delays to
> transmit
> > messages.
> >
> > The policy service is bound to 10031 TCP port.
> >
> > I have so set postfix the use p
I have setup Postfix LDAP (postfix-2.5.4-2.sasl2.vda.rhel5) on Centos 5.2
x64 and all features that i have configured are working great EXCEPT from
REMOTE LDAP SERVER.
I have configured OpenLDAP Server to some other ip on the network(its a
different server) but Postfix still looks for LOCAL LDAP D
Hey guys this is my postconf -n output:
append_dot_mydomain = no
biff = no
config_directory = /etc/postfix
disable_vrfy_command = yes
inet_interfaces = 127.0.0.1, 10.1.1.107, 189.11.37.1xx
invalid_hostname_reject_code = 450
local_transport = virtual
mailbox_command = procmail -a "$EXTENSION"
mailb
On 2/26/2009 11:00 AM, Magnus Bäck wrote:
>> You need to disable it on one side, but then enable it on the other.
>> In addition to receive_override_options = no_address_mappings in
>> main.cf
>>
>> Add something like
>> -o receive_override_options=
>>
>> to the other side that you've defined in ma
On 2/26/2009, mouss (mo...@ml.netoyen.net) wrote:
> Can't you configure outlook to save copies on your imap server? I
> don't have outlook but if my memory is correct, this is possible
> (otherwise, it's time to switch to thunderbird :)
Outlook 2007 finally provided a direct way to do this. Earlie
Hi,
Working on a project that I need some advice on. I need to build out a
Postfix server that will act as a smart host of sorts for several internal
mail domains (each domain on a different server). The server will need to:
- Relay mail directly between all of the internal mail domains (there
I wish I got to work with such cleanly separated systems.
2009/2/28 Iad Scoot :
> Relay mail directly between all of the internal mail domains (there are
> 5) without routing traffic to the Internet.
This will happen automatically if the internal servers are the
designated MXes in DNS. If not, as
thank you.
I have configured stunnel but it doesn't work, the external smtps server
doesn't relay.
How can i set up stunnel?
Please help me!
>> ok, i have configured postfix to sent mail trhough the smtp of my
>> internet service provider. Now one user have a certified email account
>> a
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 01:04:37PM +0200, vtzan wrote:
>
> I have setup Postfix LDAP (postfix-2.5.4-2.sasl2.vda.rhel5) on Centos 5.2
> x64 and all features that i have configured are working great EXCEPT from
> REMOTE LDAP SERVER.
> I have configured OpenLDAP Server to some other ip on the networ
Has any ever integrated Lotus Domino Ldap with postfix and used it for
authentication?
Hei,
I'm about implementing mail infrastructure for receiving mails from the
outside ("MX servers", they will run postfix). But now I have a question
which more or less a generic one. I would like to minimalize the amount of
information needed for a DNS zone to set up mail receiving through thes
Some systems try only one IP address per MX record (per the RFC
they assume that one name is one host; if one IP address is dead
so will the others).
Postfix does not distinguish between one MX record with many A
records, or many equal-preference MX records with one A record.
Wietse
Rich wrote:
> Has any ever integrated Lotus Domino Ldap with postfix and used it for
> authentication?
Are you talking about SASL authentication?
If so, it is up to Dovecot SASL or Cyrus SASL to talk to a back end.
lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote:
Zitat von Andres Vergara :
Hello there, list
[...]
Those last idle timeouts.. the mails are flowing fine and amavisd is
playing nice (afaik), but i'm a bit concerned about the nature of this
timeouts. Is this an expected behaviour? I've digged through the mail
li
On Feb 27, 2009, at 3:58 AM, "Rocco Scappatura" > wrote:
Thanks Sahil for your precious answer,
I'm trying to use a policy service to limit use of my SMTP gateway
platform 'cause of heavy load that usually means hard delays to
transmit
messages.
The policy service is bound to 10031 TCP por
gianluca...@interfree.it wrote:
thank you.
I have configured stunnel but it doesn't work, the external smtps server
doesn't relay.
How can i set up stunnel?
Please help me!
Here's the instructions for setting up stunnel to connect to a
smtps server:
http://www.postfix.org/TLS_README.h
I'm running postfix on server and client, forcing TLS on both.
No matter what I do, I can't seem to solve "Untrusted TLS connection
established to [...]:587: TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256
bits)" warning messages in the client log file. Aside from those
warnings, mail delivery actua
--On Wednesday, February 25, 2009 7:12 PM -0500 Victor Duchovni
wrote:
Note, the OpenLDAP API design issue is resolved with OpenLDAP 2.4.
With OpenLDAP 2.4 it is possible to set the TLS properties for
a particular LDAP connection (not just global properties), and to
associate a new OpenLDAP
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 09:35:39AM -0800, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> --On Wednesday, February 25, 2009 7:12 PM -0500 Victor Duchovni
> wrote:
>
>
>> Note, the OpenLDAP API design issue is resolved with OpenLDAP 2.4.
>>
>> With OpenLDAP 2.4 it is possible to set the TLS properties for
>> a part
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 12:25:21PM -0500, Adam Rosi-Kessel wrote:
> I'm running postfix on server and client, forcing TLS on both.
>
> No matter what I do, I can't seem to solve "Untrusted TLS connection
> established to [...]:587: TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)"
> warning messa
Victor Duchovni wrote, on 2/27/2009 12:50 PM:
I'm running postfix on server and client, forcing TLS on both.
No matter what I do, I can't seem to solve "Untrusted TLS connection
established to [...]:587: TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)"
warning messages in the client log file. A
Thank youHere's the instructions for setting up stunnel to
connect to a smtps server:http://www.postfix.org/TLS_README.html#client_smtps";
target="new">http://www.postfix.org/TLS_README.html#client_smtpsThe instructions assume the remote host listens on the customary smtps
port 465. If you nee
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 12:56:34PM -0500, Adam Rosi-Kessel wrote:
> Victor Duchovni wrote, on 2/27/2009 12:50 PM:
>>> I'm running postfix on server and client, forcing TLS on both.
>>> No matter what I do, I can't seem to solve "Untrusted TLS connection
>>> established to [...]:587: TLSv1 with ci
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 09:35:39AM -0800, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> If you are unable to test this patch at this time, I can do some testing on
> my systems using OpenLDAP 2.4.15 & Postfix 2.5.6.
The patch is working for me, please confirm that it is working for you
also. It is simple enough
I am going to use Cyrus SASL.
How do you use the mechanism to integrate with the ldap server that is part
of Lotus Domino/Notes?
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 10:18 AM, Brian Evans - Postfix List <
grkni...@scent-team.com> wrote:
> Rich wrote:
> > Has any ever integrated Lotus Domino Ldap with postfix
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 08:24:32AM -0500, Rich wrote:
> Has any ever integrated Lotus Domino Ldap with postfix and used it for
> authentication?
If LDAP is providing user login via PAM/nss, you can just use
saslauthd -a pam
if you want to verify password hashes of non system users, you
Hello All,
I need help finding out what parameter overrides what out of
bounce_queue_lifetime and maximal_queue_lifetime. On our MTAs,
bounce_queue_lifetime = 0d and maximal_queue_lifetime = 5d. So, according to
the definition, when bounce_queue_lifetime is set to 0
then mail delivery should b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I have a number of messages in my deferred queue that are destined
for an offsite alias, which is currently unreachable. I have changed
the alias to point to a local mailbox so the mail can be retrieved by
the owner. New messages sent
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 02:34:23PM -0800, Harold Paulson wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hello,
>
> I have a number of messages in my deferred queue that are destined for an
> offsite alias, which is currently unreachable. I have changed the alias to
> point to a lo
Sriram Nyshadham:
> Hello All,
>
> I need help finding out what parameter overrides what out of
> bounce_queue_lifetime and maximal_queue_lifetime. On our MTAs,
> bounce_queue_lifetime = 0d and maximal_queue_lifetime = 5d. So,
> according to the definition, when bounce_queue_lifetime is set
> to
Hello,
I'm sure this is something I'm totally missing but I have a system I'm
trying to get plus addressing working, and not having any luck. The
email is delivered, but just to the Inbox, not to the folder...
I've got the recipient delimiter enabled in main.cf (output of postconf
-n shows it ena
Sriram Nyshadham wrote:
Hello All,
I need help finding out what parameter overrides what out of
bounce_queue_lifetime and maximal_queue_lifetime. On our MTAs,
bounce_queue_lifetime = 0d and maximal_queue_lifetime = 5d. So,
according to the definition, when bounce_queue_lifetime is set t
Charles Marcus a écrit :
> On 2/26/2009 11:00 AM, Magnus Bäck wrote:
>>> You need to disable it on one side, but then enable it on the other.
>>> In addition to receive_override_options = no_address_mappings in
>>> main.cf
>>>
>>> Add something like
>>> -o receive_override_options=
>>>
>>> to the o
Charles Marcus wrote:
Hello,
I'm sure this is something I'm totally missing but I have a system I'm
trying to get plus addressing working, and not having any luck. The
email is delivered, but just to the Inbox, not to the folder...
I've got the recipient delimiter enabled in main.cf (output of
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 05:48:35PM -0500, Charles Marcus wrote:
> I'm sure this is something I'm totally missing but I have a system I'm
> trying to get plus addressing working, and not having any luck. The
> email is delivered, but just to the Inbox, not to the folder...
Plus addressing is worki
Charles Marcus a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> I'm sure this is something I'm totally missing but I have a system I'm
> trying to get plus addressing working, and not having any luck. The
> email is delivered, but just to the Inbox, not to the folder...
>
> I've got the recipient delimiter enabled in main
Hey thanks for the info - it looks like (from what I've read so far) that
the sender_dependent_relayhost_maps parameter is for specific users - is
there any way to do this for any user (or all users) in a given domain w/o
having to list their full address in the map file?
Again, thanks a bunch fo
2009/2/28 Iad Scoot :
> Hey thanks for the info - it looks like (from what I've read so far) that
> the sender_dependent_relayhost_maps parameter is for specific users - is
> there any way to do this for any user (or all users) in a given domain w/o
> having to list their full address in the map fi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Victor,
On Feb 27, 2009, at 2:39 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 02:34:23PM -0800, Harold Paulson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I have a number of messages in my deferred queue that are destined
On 27-Feb-2009, at 15:48, Charles Marcus wrote:
I'm sure this is something I'm totally missing but I have a system I'm
trying to get plus addressing working, and not having any luck. The
email is delivered, but just to the Inbox, not to the folder...
It is not postfix's job to deliver to the fo
Gotcha - and after a "little more" research I've found a couple of examples
online. It'll be Monday before I can try but much thanks again - I will post
back my outcome.
- iad
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 6:33 PM, Barney Desmond wrote:
> 2009/2/28 Iad Scoot :
> > Hey thanks for the info - it looks l
> --- Original Message ---
> From: Harold Paulson
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Sent: 27-Feb-09, 17:41:27
> Subject: Re: postsuper -r not re-resolving aliases
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Victor,
>
> On Feb 27, 2009, at 2:39 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
>
>
43 matches
Mail list logo
