hi all
on my smtp out i want to put ''reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org'' since
many local ADSL dynamic ips are in PBL ; is it desirable?
where i can put this? this relay machine does only sending out;
help appreciated
On Mon, 2009-03-09 at 09:05 +0200, K bharathan wrote:
hi all
on my smtp out i want to put ''reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org''
since many local ADSL dynamic ips are in PBL ; is it desirable?
where i can put this? this relay machine does only sending out;
help appreciated
For outgoing
Hello,
I'm using postfix postfix-2.3.3-2 x86 configured for a single domain.
Clients are allowed to relay only after they have performed SMTP AUTH
or if they connect from $mynetworks. (postconf -n posted at
http://pastebin.ca/1356405)
I'd like to mimic M$ Exchange recall behaviour for emails sent
can you show an example?
postfix log (my contract forbids to put client data here, so masqueraded
the real hostnames and IPs):
Mar 6 19:01:41 mail postfix/smtpd[6930]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
www.XXX.hu[X.X.X.X]: 450 4.1.7 www-d...@www.xxx.hu: Sender address
rejected: unverified
On 3/8/2009, Wietse Venema (wie...@porcupine.org) wrote:
It is not created with Star Trek transporter beams that materialize a
complete object all at once.
I am very disappointed. I began using postfix based solely on the
assurance of one person that Start Trek transporter beams could most
Costin Guşă wrote:
Hello,
I'm using postfix postfix-2.3.3-2 x86 configured for a single domain.
Clients are allowed to relay only after they have performed SMTP AUTH
or if they connect from $mynetworks. (postconf -n posted at
http://pastebin.ca/1356405)
I'd like to mimic M$ Exchange recall
On Sun, Mar 08, 2009 at 08:47:53PM -0700, Jacky Chan wrote:
Hi all,
I found when I set main.cf to 740, owner is root and group is postfix.
[11:41:55][use...@nx1:~]# echo testing | mail -s testing root
[11:41:58][use...@nx1:~]# send-mail: fatal: open /etc/postfix/main.cf:
Permission
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 2:43 PM, Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org wrote:
Costin Guşă wrote:
[...]
I'd like to mimic M$ Exchange recall behaviour for emails sent by
relay-allowed clients.
[...]
I don't think this is a good idea at all.
Folks by now somewhat expect mail being near real
Halassy Zolt??n:
can you show an example?
postfix log (my contract forbids to put client data here, so masqueraded
the real hostnames and IPs):
Mar 6 19:01:41 mail postfix/smtpd[6930]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
www.XXX.hu[X.X.X.X]: 450 4.1.7 www-d...@www.xxx.hu: Sender address
Victor Duchovni:
On Sun, Mar 08, 2009 at 08:47:53PM -0700, Jacky Chan wrote:
Hi all,
I found when I set main.cf to 740, owner is root and group is postfix.
[11:41:55][use...@nx1:~]# echo testing | mail -s testing root
[11:41:58][use...@nx1:~]# send-mail: fatal: open
On 3/9/2009, Costin Gu_ (costi...@gmail.com) wrote:
yes, it's true that people expect instant delivery; however I was
thinking at short delays such as 5 minutes, since most regrettable
errors are discovered within the next few seconds following the event,
so keeping the mail in queue for
On 3/9/2009, Jorey Bump (l...@joreybump.com) wrote:
Isn't this best implemented at the MUA level? At the very least, a user
can simply save drafts of all composed email, then review send
messages periodically. Not only does this address the problem, it is
more convenient for everyone,
Hi list,
I would known if Postfix is able to rewrite body messages.
I would translate mails comes from an application by Pattern
Exemple:
From: t...@domain.com To: u...@domain.com Subject:MyApp Body:[Item1]
toto [Item2] titi
To
From: t...@domain.com To: u...@domain.com Subject:MyApp
Guillaume Rehm:
Hi list,
I would known if Postfix is able to rewrite body messages.
I would translate mails comes from an application by Pattern
Exemple:
From: t...@domain.com To: u...@domain.com Subject:MyApp Body:[Item1]
toto [Item2] titi
To
From: t...@domain.com To:
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 3:55 PM, Jorey Bump l...@joreybump.com wrote:
Charles Marcus wrote, at 03/09/2009 09:42 AM:
On 3/9/2009, Costin Gu_ (costi...@gmail.com) wrote:
yes, it's true that people expect instant delivery; however I was
thinking at short delays such as 5 minutes, since most
Charles Marcus wrote:
On 3/9/2009, Jorey Bump (l...@joreybump.com) wrote:
Isn't this best implemented at the MUA level? At the very least, a user
can simply save drafts of all composed email, then review send
messages periodically. Not only does this address the problem, it is
more convenient
Hi,
I have reject_unknown_client in my smtpd_recipient_restrictions and have 2
questions regarding the working of this option. I looked up the
documentation, but would love to cross check my understanding with other
users.
1.
I have noticed that the following scenario results in rejection with
On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 08:46:12PM +0530, Krishna Murthy wrote:
I have reject_unknown_client in my smtpd_recipient_restrictions
Don't. This restriction is to aggressive. It is only useful in combination
with other tests (applied to specific netblocks, sender domains, ...)
The above behavior
Krishna Murthy wrote:
Hi,
I have reject_unknown_client in my smtpd_recipient_restrictions and
have 2 questions regarding the working of this option. I looked up the
documentation, but would love to cross check my understanding with other
users.
En/na Jordi Moles Blanco ha escrit:
En/na Magnus Bäck ha escrit:
On Thu, March 5, 2009 10:13 am, Jordi Moles Blanco said:
En/na martijn.list ha escrit:
You are probably forgetting to convert the single dot (.) to dot-dot
(..)
See RFC 2821 section 4.5.2 Transparency
thanks for
Hello,
Rocco Scappatura a écrit :
[snip]
Why the message is not delivered immediately to the virtual mailbox
after
vacation filter?
because the domain is not listed as a virtual mailbox domain
At first glance, I shoud say as above too, but I swear that the query
is exactly
On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 04:50:29PM +0100, Jordi Moles Blanco wrote:
after your comments I thought I had fixed my filter and everything seemed
to work fine. I only replaced \n.\n with \n..\n in the body of the message.
You don't change message bodies before transmission, you follow RFCs
821,
Hello,
I have setup a box running postfix+amavis+spamassasin to act as a mail
gateway. I currently have an older postfix box doing mail gateway duties
now. I'd like to run some live tests on the new spam box by forwarding some
of the users mail from the current gateway to the new box for
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 4:02 PM, Charles Marcus
cmar...@media-brokers.com wrote:
On 3/9/2009, Jorey Bump (l...@joreybump.com) wrote:
Isn't this best implemented at the MUA level? At the very least, a user
can simply save drafts of all composed email, then review send
messages periodically. Not
Costin Guşă wrote:
however i'm wondering if my proposed implementation would *really*
catch not only all relayed mail but also internal clients sending mail
to internal clients ?
To only catch outbound mail, use something like this (note
smtpd_SENDER_restrictions):
# main.cf
Aaron Zuercher wrote:
Hello,
I have setup a box running postfix+amavis+spamassasin to act as a mail
gateway. I currently have an older postfix box doing mail gateway
duties now. I'd like to run some live tests on the new spam box by
forwarding some of the users mail from the current gateway
Is it possible to route outbound messages based upon the domain of the from
address? For example:
If u...@example.commailto:u...@example.com sends and outbound message it is
routed to host1.mailrelay.com and if u...@test.commailto:u...@test.com sends
and outbound message it is routed to
On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 02:10:03PM -0400, Zachary Fortna wrote:
Is it possible to route outbound messages based upon the domain of the from
address? For example:
If u...@example.commailto:u...@example.com sends and outbound message it is
routed to host1.mailrelay.com and if
On 9-Mar-2009, at 06:31, Noel Jones wrote:
LuKreme wrote:
On 8-Mar-2009, at 19:39, Sahil Tandon wrote:
What happens if you set:
virtual_alias_domains =
in main.cf?
Then all mail to local (non virtual) users bounces with a Relay
access denied error.
Sounds as if you have
Hello,
I have a restriction that mandates only certain types of email to be allowed
outbound. If an email does not match a pattern, they want that email BCCed to
another account. Reading the documentation, I see that body_checks isn't a good
way to filter multiple lines and that I should use
At 01:38 PM 3/9/2009, you wrote:
Hello,
I have a restriction that mandates only certain types of email to be
allowed outbound. If an email does not match a pattern, they want
that email BCCed to another account. Reading the documentation, I
see that body_checks isn't a good way to filter
Post Freak wrote:
Hello,
I have a restriction that mandates only certain types of email to be
allowed outbound. If an email does not match a pattern, they want that
email BCCed to another account. Reading the documentation, I see that
body_checks isn't a good way to filter multiple lines and
LuKreme a écrit :
On 9-Mar-2009, at 06:31, Noel Jones wrote:
LuKreme wrote:
On 8-Mar-2009, at 19:39, Sahil Tandon wrote:
What happens if you set:
virtual_alias_domains =
in main.cf?
Then all mail to local (non virtual) users bounces with a Relay
access denied error.
Sounds as if you
K bharathan a écrit :
hi all
on my smtp out i want to put ''reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org
http://zen.spamhaus.org'' since many local ADSL dynamic ips are in PBL
; is it desirable?
where i can put this? this relay machine does only sending out;
if this is only out, then it should not
Charles Marcus a écrit :
On 3/9/2009, Jorey Bump (l...@joreybump.com) wrote:
Isn't this best implemented at the MUA level? At the very least, a user
can simply save drafts of all composed email, then review send
messages periodically. Not only does this address the problem, it is
more
Costin Guşă a écrit :
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 3:55 PM, Jorey Bump l...@joreybump.com wrote:
Charles Marcus wrote, at 03/09/2009 09:42 AM:
On 3/9/2009, Costin Gu_ (costi...@gmail.com) wrote:
yes, it's true that people expect instant delivery; however I was
thinking at short delays such as 5
Krishna Murthy a écrit :
Hi,
I have reject_unknown_client in my smtpd_recipient_restrictions and
have 2 questions regarding the working of this option. I looked up the
documentation, but would love to cross check my understanding with other
users.
1.
I have noticed that the following
Hi,
Postfix 2.5.5 on Debian
I've just noticed a discrepancy between showq (postqueue -p) and
postcat. I've looked through the code, played with the conversion code
in postcat and I honestly can not figure out what's going wrong:
-Queue ID- --Size-- Arrival Time
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 01:01:37AM -0400, Glen B wrote:
Hi,
Postfix 2.5.5 on Debian
I've just noticed a discrepancy between showq (postqueue -p) and postcat.
I've looked through the code, played with the conversion code in postcat
and I honestly can not figure out what's going wrong:
39 matches
Mail list logo
