Noel Jones a écrit :
> Ivan Ricotti wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> thanks for your reply.
>>
>> Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
>>> Look a few lines above this. Why did you accept mail for a non-existent
>>> user?
>>
>> But I do *not* accept mail for non-existent users:
>>
>> Mar 26 09:27:11 athene postfix
While trying to get this to work, I installed the squirrelmail plugin
called Restrict Senders.
http://www.squirrelmail.org/plugin_view.php?id=213
This is stopping the spammers using webmail.
Regards,
Ross
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
[mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf
On Fri, 27 Mar 2009, Janaka Angulugaha wrote:
> I'm receiving SPAM mails with Sender and recipient has same address. I like
> to know how to stop this using Postfix configuration.
This has been discussed several times before; please search the archives and
understand the consequences of such an a
Hi,
I'm receiving SPAM mails with Sender and recipient has same
address. I like to know how to stop this using Postfix configuration.
Rgds
Janaka
Ivan Ricotti wrote:
Hi,
thanks for your reply.
Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
Look a few lines above this. Why did you accept mail for a non-existent
user?
But I do *not* accept mail for non-existent users:
Mar 26 09:27:11 athene postfix/smtpd[29704]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
mail02.m
>I had to resort to installing postfix-policyd to rate limit them.
>(Make sure you have Squirrel use auth so regardless of forged-from
>lines, you still rate limit accounts).
I've just been playing with postfix-policyd (debian package 1.80).
The only way I could get it working was by using the fo
Noel Jones wrote:
> You can't pipe to newaliases.
> You can use a proto file with comments and some script to create the
> input file that newaliases requires. This seems a natural for a
> Makefile.
> -- Noel Jones
I was aiming for something that was "no mistakes" proof for other system
administ
On Thu, 26 Mar 2009, Steffen Schaumburg wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> Sorry if this has been asked before I searched all over the place but I
> just can't figure it out. I'm trying to setup postfix, using dovecot for
> delivery (and IMAP&POP3). Dovecot in turn uses a MySQL backend. I used this
> guide:
On Thu, 26 Mar 2009, LuKreme wrote:
> I have in my postffix helo checks, perhaps a bad idea,
>
> [some checks up here that reject]
> /^postmaster\@/ OK
> /^abuse\@/ OK
Why do these email address patterns appear in a HELO access(5) map?
> At the time I set this up it was pretty important tha
carconni:
> Hi,
>
> I've been digging around and I haven't been able to find what I'm
> really looking for so I thought I'd go straight to the ones "who know".
>
> Can Postfix be run in a clustered environment (ie: multiple servers
> running postfix utilizing one data store) under any OS?
Ea
"Ross Tsolakidis" wrote:
Hello Ross,
> However, my question (finally) is :)
>
> Received: from 217.21.80.109
> (SquirrelMail authenticated user
> redac...@fearmail.com.au
> by webmail.fearmail.com.au with HTTP;
>
> I have no user called 'redacted' in our email user auth d
On Fri, 27 Mar 2009 09:44:21 +1100
"Ross Tsolakidis" wrote:
> Just change the users password and slap them for clicking on the link.
> Easy.
Easy but tedious.
I had to resort to installing postfix-policyd to rate limit them.
(Make sure you have Squirrel use auth so regardless of forged-from
li
Hi all,
I'm sure many of you are battling this issue.
Our mailserver is being blacklisted so often it's getting painful.
I don't believe this is a postfix issue, but most of the brilliant mail
server admins are here :)
I'm pretty sure the following is happening, here's the news from the
squirrel
LuKreme a écrit :
> I have in my postffix helo checks, perhaps a bad idea,
>
> [some checks up here that reject]
> /^postmaster\@/ OK
> /^abuse\@/ OK
>
> At the time I set this up it was pretty important that postmaster mail
> got through, but looking over the last 12 months of mail, I've re
Hi everyone,
Sorry if this has been asked before I searched all over the place but I
just can't figure it out. I'm trying to setup postfix, using dovecot for
delivery (and IMAP&POP3). Dovecot in turn uses a MySQL backend. I used this
guide: http://en.gentoo-wiki.com/wiki/Mail_server_using_Postfix_a
Noel Jones a écrit :
> mouss wrote:
>> I am trying to "collect" methods to setup postfix in an HA
>> configuration, for "outbound" relay (no MUA involved). a use case is
>> using multiple postfix boxes to relay mail out for one or more exchange
>> servers. there are many possibilities. which one is
On 3/26/2009, Ivan Ricotti (i.rico...@elabor.homelinux.org) wrote:
> Mar 26 09:27:11 athene postfix/smtpd[29704]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
> mail02.mail.esat.net[193.120.142.82]: 450 4.1.1
Also, your postconf -n output did NOT show a reject code of 450, so
something is fishy...
Are you sure you
On 26-Mar-2009, at 14:48, Asai wrote:
Mar 26 11:58:18 triata postfix/smtpd[25357]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT
from unknown[63.229.177.226]: 554 5.7.1 :
Relay access denied; from= to=> proto=ESMTP helo=
This log line has nothing to do with Eudora. Your postfix is not
allowing mail from that IP
On 3/26/2009, Ivan Ricotti (i.rico...@elabor.homelinux.org) wrote:
> Mar 26 09:27:11 athene postfix/smtpd[29704]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
> mail02.mail.esat.net[193.120.142.82]: 450 4.1.1
> <3f6f17ca.813b5...@elabor.homelinux.org>: Recipient address rejected:
> undeliverable address: unknown use
On Thursday, March 26, 2009 at 21:29 CET,
Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> I have many virtual domains, stored in MySQL database. To reject
> some spam I check all HELOs not to be any of my domain (because it is
> fake HELOs for sure). I have such check written like this:
>
> smtpd_helo_restricti
Ivan Ricotti wrote:
Hi,
thanks for your reply.
Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
Look a few lines above this. Why did you accept mail for a non-existent
user?
But I do *not* accept mail for non-existent users:
Mar 26 09:27:11 athene postfix/smtpd[29704]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
On Thursday, March 26, 2009 at 21:48 CET,
Asai wrote:
> From /var/log/maillog, one example of the problem:
>
> Mar 26 11:58:18 triata postfix/smtpd[25357]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
> unknown[63.229.177.226]: 554 5.7.1 : Relay access
> denied; from= to=
> proto=ESMTP helo=
The connecti
On Thu, 26 Mar 2009 13:48:01 -0700 Asai wrote:
>LuKreme wrote:
>> On 26-Mar-2009, at 13:57, Asai wrote:
>>> My apologies, I hope this is of assistance.
>>
>> LOGS of the eudora user tring to send to gmail.
>>
>>
>> And don't top-post.
>>
>>
> From /var/log/maillog, one example of the problem:
>
>M
LuKreme wrote:
On 26-Mar-2009, at 13:57, Asai wrote:
My apologies, I hope this is of assistance.
LOGS of the eudora user tring to send to gmail.
And don't top-post.
From /var/log/maillog, one example of the problem:
Mar 26 11:58:18 triata postfix/smtpd[25357]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
Hello, postfix.
I have many virtual domains, stored in MySQL database. To reject
some spam I check all HELOs not to be any of my domain (because it is
fake HELOs for sure). I have such check written like this:
smtpd_helo_restrictions = permit_mynetworks,
perm
On 26-Mar-2009, at 14:10, LuKreme wrote:
Once the message gets OKed by helo_checks.pcre it does not get
checked by the reject_rbl_client.
Ah.. OK, this is not right. It is just that the IP was not in the RBL
when that message came through.
So, the original question still stands:
is there
Hi,
I've been digging around and I haven't been able to find what I'm
really looking for so I thought I'd go straight to the ones "who know".
Can Postfix be run in a clustered environment (ie: multiple servers
running postfix utilizing one data store) under any OS?
I know NFS is not reall
On 26-Mar-2009, at 13:57, Asai wrote:
My apologies, I hope this is of assistance.
LOGS of the eudora user tring to send to gmail.
And don't top-post.
--
Would you say you worship Satan, or do you simply respect his
no-nonsense approach to discipline?
On 26-Mar-2009, at 13:36, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
LuKreme wrote:
On 26-Mar-2009, at 11:53, Peter Blair wrote:
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 12:55 PM, LuKreme wrote:
Obviously I can't disable the account as it is required, but is
there
something that I can do to stop the connections for
Hi,
thanks for your reply.
Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
> Look a few lines above this. Why did you accept mail for a non-existent
> user?
But I do *not* accept mail for non-existent users:
Mar 26 09:27:11 athene postfix/smtpd[29704]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
mail02.mail.esat.net[193.120
My apologies, I hope this is of assistance.
postconf -n:
alias_database = hash:/etc/aliases
alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases
broken_sasl_auth_clients = yes
command_directory = /usr/sbin
config_directory = /etc/postfix
content_filter = smtp-amavis:[127.0.0.1]:10024
daemon_directory = /usr/libexec/p
Asai:
> Although I dislike Eudora for various reasons, my users want it. So now
> I'm trying to figure out why one user can send to our local domains, but
> cannot relay to Gmail. This is not a problem on a client like
> Thunderbird. Any insights? Thanks.
See the mailing list welcome messag
LuKreme wrote:
> On 26-Mar-2009, at 11:53, Peter Blair wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 12:55 PM, LuKreme wrote:
>>
>>> Obviously I can't disable the account as it is required, but is there
>>> something that I can do to stop the connections for messages like this:
>>>
>>> Return-Path:
>>> X-Ori
On 26-Mar-2009, at 04:59, Ivan Ricotti wrote:
I suspect that some windows users in my network is sending spam... and
the question is: how can I prevent this acting on postfix?
Block access from your LAN to port 25 outbound.
--
Si Hoc Legere Scis Nimium Eruditionis Habes
Asai wrote:
> Although I dislike Eudora for various reasons, my users want it. So
> now I'm trying to figure out why one user can send to our local
> domains, but cannot relay to Gmail. This is not a problem on a client
> like Thunderbird. Any insights? Thanks.
>
Logs? postconf -n?
There is no
Ivan Ricotti wrote:
> Hi,
> sorry to bother you all again... my fight against the spam is still on
> the go (and I think I'm losing...). I was searching through my mail.info
> log... what do you think about these lines?
>
> Mar 26 09:27:11 athene postfix/cleanup[29784]: 19F65E72ED:
> message-id=<20
Although I dislike Eudora for various reasons, my users want it. So now
I'm trying to figure out why one user can send to our local domains, but
cannot relay to Gmail. This is not a problem on a client like
Thunderbird. Any insights? Thanks.
--
asai
On 26-Mar-2009, at 11:53, Peter Blair wrote:
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 12:55 PM, LuKreme wrote:
Obviously I can't disable the account as it is required, but is there
something that I can do to stop the connections for messages like
this:
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: postmas...@covisp.net
Del
Hi,
Charles Marcus wrote:
> At a minimum, we need output of postconf -n (NOT copy/paste from
> main.cf), and complete logs showing the spam going out...
>
> the less obfuscation you perform, the easier it will be to help you...
>
sorry to bother you all again... my fight against the spam is still
Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
> Aaron Martinez wrote:
>
>> I'm running postfix 2.3.7 and getting "Helo command rejected: Host not
>> found;" which i would completely expect if I had some
>> smtpd_helo_restrictions set but I don't.. at least that i can see.. can
>> someone possibly tell me
Aaron Martinez wrote:
> I'm running postfix 2.3.7 and getting "Helo command rejected: Host not
> found;" which i would completely expect if I had some
> smtpd_helo_restrictions set but I don't.. at least that i can see.. can
> someone possibly tell me what's right in front of my face that i'm not
HI All,
I'm running postfix 2.3.7 and getting "Helo command rejected: Host not
found;" which i would completely expect if I had some
smtpd_helo_restrictions set but I don't.. at least that i can see.. can
someone possibly tell me what's right in front of my face that i'm not
seeing?
Postconf ou
Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 3/26/2009, Jim Wright (j...@wrightthisway.com) wrote:
>
>> Two options. 1, Eliminate windows users from your network.
>>
>
> Please... such comments are worse than useless...
>
>
It may not be what you want to hear, especially if you're heavily
invested in mi
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 12:55 PM, LuKreme wrote:
> Obviously I can't disable the account as it is required, but is there
> something that I can do to stop the connections for messages like this:
>
> Return-Path:
> X-Original-To: postmas...@covisp.net
> Delivered-To: postmas...@covisp.net
> Recei
I have in my postffix helo checks, perhaps a bad idea,
[some checks up here that reject]
/^postmaster\@/ OK
/^abuse\@/ OK
At the time I set this up it was pretty important that postmaster mail
got through, but looking over the last 12 months of mail, I've
received exactly two legitimate
Xn Nooby wrote:
> I am using Dovecot, but have been unable to get either it's maildir or
> dirsize quotas to be enforced.
>
> It does not seem to prevent the user from receiving emails. I set the
> limit to 10MB, and was able to receive more than 12MB in emails. I
> restarted dovecot after making t
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 09:31:59AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Michael Maciag:
> > Is it possible to automatically add a CC to an incoming message
> > based on recipient using rewriting, similar to what recipient_bcc_maps
> > can do? We'd like to have the added address be visible to the
> > orig
Ivan Ricotti wrote:
This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification
Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:
ab...@elabor.homelinux.org
Technical details of permanent failure:
Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the
recipient domain.
I am using Dovecot, but have been unable to get either it's maildir or
dirsize quotas to be enforced.
It does not seem to prevent the user from receiving emails. I set the
limit to 10MB, and was able to receive more than 12MB in emails. I
restarted dovecot after making the changes below. Is there
On 3/26/2009, Jim Wright (j...@wrightthisway.com) wrote:
> Two options. 1, Eliminate windows users from your network.
Please... such comments are worse than useless...
--
Best regards,
Charles
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ivan Ricotti wrote:
>> 1, Eliminate windows users from your network.
>
> Yeah! I really would like to! :D
> Sadly, I can't... :'(
There's a rule in my (Cisco) border router that allows only the DMZ
mailserver to connect to port 25 outside my net.
Michael Maciag:
> Is it possible to automatically add a CC to an incoming message
> based on recipient using rewriting, similar to what recipient_bcc_maps
> can do? We'd like to have the added address be visible to the
> original recipient.
Yes.
For complex transformations, use a Milter or extern
Is it possible to automatically add a CC to an incoming message based on
recipient using rewriting, similar to what recipient_bcc_maps can do? We'd like
to have the added address be visible to the original recipient.
- Mike
Hello,
Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * Ivan Ricotti :
>
>> check_sender_access hash:/etc/postfix/backscatter,
> What's in here?
>
athene:~# cat /etc/postfix/backscatter
<> reject_rbl_client ips.backscatterer.org
postmaster reject_rbl_client ips.backscatterer.org
as specified here:
http://www
Ivan Ricotti:
> Regarding my log, here some suspicious snippets:
>
>
> Mar 26 13:14:08 athene postfix/smtpd[690]: connect from
> spike.porcupine.org[168.100.189.2]
> Mar 26 13:14:09 athene postfix/smtpd[690]: 528B8E72ED:
> client=spike.porcupine.org[168.100.189.2]
> Mar 26 13:14:09 athene postfix
* Ivan Ricotti :
> check_sender_access hash:/etc/postfix/backscatter,
What's in here?
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Postfix - Einrichtung, Betrieb und Wartung Tel. +49 (0)30-450 570-155
http://www.computerbeschimpfung.de
Real programmers never work 9 to 5. If any real programmers are around
at
Ivan Ricotti wrote, at 03/26/2009 06:59 AM:
> I suspect that some windows users in my network is sending spam... and
> the question is: how can I prevent this acting on postfix?
Don't speculate. Read your logs.
Hi Jim,
Jim Wright wrote:
> On Mar 26, 2009, at 5:59 AM, Ivan Ricotti wrote:
>
>> I suspect that some windows users in my network is sending spam... and
>> the question is: how can I prevent this acting on postfix?
>
> Two options. 1, Eliminate windows users from your network.
Yeah! I really
Hello,
Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 3/26/2009, Ivan Ricotti (i.rico...@elabor.homelinux.org) wrote:
>> Here it is my main.cf:
> No. Please follow the instructions provided in the welcome message.
you're right. I beg you pardon.
> At a minimum, we need output of postconf -n (NOT copy/paste from
>
On Mar 26, 2009, at 5:59 AM, Ivan Ricotti wrote:
I suspect that some windows users in my network is sending spam... and
the question is: how can I prevent this acting on postfix?
Two options. 1, Eliminate windows users from your network. 2, scan
outgoing mail for spam before accepting it f
On 3/26/2009, Ivan Ricotti (i.rico...@elabor.homelinux.org) wrote:
> Here it is my main.cf:
No. Please follow the instructions provided in the welcome message.
At a minimum, we need output of postconf -n (NOT copy/paste from
main.cf), and complete logs showing the spam going out...
the less obfu
Hello again,
Ivan Ricotti wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> as I said before I'm a newbie in mail server administration, so any help
> will be *greatly* appreciated!
>
> My mail server is continuosly listed in some blacklists and it's a whole
> week I'm trying to tighten up the security.
>
also spamcop bla
Hi all,
as I said before I'm a newbie in mail server administration, so any help
will be *greatly* appreciated!
My mail server is continuosly listed in some blacklists and it's a whole
week I'm trying to tighten up the security.
Few seconds ago I've been listed (again!) in the CBL:
http://cbl.a
63 matches
Mail list logo
