Zitat von Adrian Overbury :
Has anyone ever written a proxy server for policy services? I have
a policy server (grossd, one of the best greylisting engines I've
ever used) that, if it goes down, causes my Postfix servers to temp
fail everything with 'Server configuration problem'. This is
Le 12-mai-09 à 15:17, Wietse Venema a écrit :
Postfix stable release 2.6.0 is available. After Postfix was declared
"complete" with version 2.3, the focus has moved towards improving
the code/documentation, and updating it for changing environments.
Hello,
We have installed the new version
Hello,
I'm trying to delete/discard an emai if it has a header with one value.
I've to do it after it is accepted (and after one content filter
execution) so I thought in smtp_header_checks but I see that it doesn't
support actions like DISCARD.
Any idea of how to do this?
Thanks!
Regards,
--
Dear
I'm trying to compile Postfix 2.6 on Ubuntu 2.10 or CentOS 5.2 with the
following arguments:
make tidy
/usr/bin/make makefiles CCARGS=" -DMAX_DYNAMIC_MAPS -DHAS_PCRE
-DMYORIGIN_FROM_FILE -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64
-DHAS_LDAP -DHAS_SSL -I/usr/include/openssl -DUSE_SASL_AUTH
David Touzeau:
>
> Dear
>
> I'm trying to compile Postfix 2.6 on Ubuntu 2.10 or CentOS 5.2 with the
> following arguments:
>
> make tidy
> /usr/bin/make makefiles CCARGS=" -DMAX_DYNAMIC_MAPS -DHAS_PCRE
> -DMYORIGIN_FROM_FILE -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64
> -DHAS_LDAP -DHAS_SSL -I/u
Dear
this is the output of
pcre-config --cflags
Nothing in output for the 2 distributions
on Ubuntu :
pcre-config --libs
-L/usr/lib -lpcre
On CentOS:
-lpcre
Message initial
De: Wietse Venema
À: da...@touzeau.eu
Cc: postfix-users@postfix.org
Sujet: Re: Unable to comp
Wietse Venema:
> David Touzeau:
> > /usr/bin/make makefiles CCARGS=" -DMAX_DYNAMIC_MAPS -DHAS_PCRE
> > -DMYORIGIN_FROM_FILE -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64
> > -DHAS_LDAP -DHAS_SSL -I/usr/include/openssl -DUSE_SASL_AUTH
> > -I/usr/include/sasl -DUSE_CYRUS_SASL -DUSE_TLS" DEBUG= AUXLIBS="
On Wed, 13 May 2009, Alvaro Mar?n wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to delete/discard an emai if it has a header with one value.
I've to do it after it is accepted (and after one content filter
execution) so I thought in smtp_header_checks but I see that it doesn't
support actions like DISCARD.
Any idea
Hi,
I have some trouble trying to validate mail aliases from LDAP.
My users are defined in LDAP with the attribute 'mail' that stores each
mail alias and the attribute mailRoutingAddress that stores the real
mail address (corresponding to uid).
for example:
dn: uid=lastname, ou=people, dc=mydoma
Duane Hill escribió:
> On Wed, 13 May 2009, Alvaro Mar?n wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm trying to delete/discard an emai if it has a header with one value.
>> I've to do it after it is accepted (and after one content filter
>> execution) so I thought in smtp_header_checks but I see that it doesn't
>
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 04:46:02PM +0200, Micka?l Can?vet wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have some trouble trying to validate mail aliases from LDAP.
>
> My users are defined in LDAP with the attribute 'mail' that stores each
> mail alias and the attribute mailRoutingAddress that stores the real
> mail addr
Just Notice when do
ld -lpcre --verbose
i receive error
ld: warning: cannot find entry symbol _start; not setting start address
but library is found in /usr/lib/libpcre.so
attempt to open /usr/i386-redhat-linux/lib/libpcre.so failed
attempt to open /usr/i386-redhat-linux/lib/libpcre.a failed
* Alvaro Marín :
> >> I'm trying to delete/discard an emai if it has a header with one value.
> >> I've to do it after it is accepted (and after one content filter
> >> execution) so I thought in smtp_header_checks but I see that it doesn't
> >> support actions like DISCARD.
> >> Any idea of how t
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 05:09:18PM +0200, David Touzeau wrote:
> Just Notice when do
>
> ld -lpcre --verbose
>
> i receive error
> ld: warning: cannot find entry symbol _start; not setting start address
This is normal. Your "CCARGS" recipe is broken. Either:
- Don't include "HAS_PCRE
Ralf Hildebrandt escribió:
> * Alvaro Marín :
>
I'm trying to delete/discard an emai if it has a header with one value.
I've to do it after it is accepted (and after one content filter
execution) so I thought in smtp_header_checks but I see that it doesn't
support actions like
On Wed, 13 May 2009, Alvaro Mar?n wrote:
Duane Hill escribi?:
On Wed, 13 May 2009, Alvaro Mar?n wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to delete/discard an emai if it has a header with one value.
I've to do it after it is accepted (and after one content filter
execution) so I thought in smtp_header_checks
Many thanks victor
Without notify HAS_PCRE the compilation run correctly
Message initial
De: Victor Duchovni
Reply-to: postfix-users@postfix.org
À: postfix-users@postfix.org
Sujet: Re: Unable to compile Postfix 2.6 on Ubuntu 8.10 or CentOS 5.2
Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 11:13:19
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 03:39:32PM +, Duane Hill wrote:
> On Wed, 13 May 2009, Alvaro Mar?n wrote:
>
>> Duane Hill escribi?:
>>> On Wed, 13 May 2009, Alvaro Mar?n wrote:
>>>
Hello,
I'm trying to delete/discard an emai if it has a header with one value.
I've to do it after i
Is there a way to exempt postmas...@my.domain, ab...@my.domain and
u...@my.domain from header_checks and body_checks while still
maintaining the functionality of those checks?
-Eric
* Eric Cunningham :
> Is there a way to exempt postmas...@my.domain, ab...@my.domain and
> u...@my.domain from header_checks and body_checks while still maintaining
> the functionality of those checks?
No.
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Postfix - Einrichtung, Betrieb und Wartung Tel. +49 (0)30-450
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
there is a Postfix running for several local and virtual domains now,
some messages are stored locally in maildirs, some are being aliased
somwehere else, according to alias map. Postfix is configured to filter
mails through Spammassassin and C
David Zejda:
-- Start of PGP signed section.
> Hello,
>
> there is a Postfix running for several local and virtual domains now,
> some messages are stored locally in maildirs, some are being aliased
> somwehere else, according to alias map. Postfix is configured to filter
> mails through Spammassa
Adrian Overbury wrote:
> Has anyone ever written a proxy server for policy services? I have a
> policy server (grossd, one of the best greylisting engines I've ever
> used) that, if it goes down, causes my Postfix servers to temp fail
> everything with 'Server configuration problem'. This is a re
On May 13, 2009, at 12:51 PM, J Sloan wrote:
Adrian Overbury wrote:
Has anyone ever written a proxy server for policy services? I have a
policy server (grossd, one of the best greylisting engines I've ever
used) that, if it goes down, causes my Postfix servers to temp fail
everything with 'Se
Hi
I need to do something like this:
Someone sends an e-mail to u...@domain.com
Someone gets a reply from postfix saying "User has moved to
newu...@newdomain.com"
I need postfix to STILL deliver the message to u...@domain.com (which
doesn't happens)
I tried using relocated with virtual aliases,
J Sloan:
> Adrian Overbury wrote:
> > Has anyone ever written a proxy server for policy services? I have a
> > policy server (grossd, one of the best greylisting engines I've ever
> > used) that, if it goes down, causes my Postfix servers to temp fail
> > everything with 'Server configuration prob
On May 13, 2009, at 10:40 AM, Fabio Viero wrote:
I need to do something like this:
Someone sends an e-mail to u...@domain.com
Someone gets a reply from postfix saying "User has moved to
newu...@newdomain.com"
I need postfix to STILL deliver the message to u...@domain.com (which
doesn't happens)
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 2:54 PM, Scott Haneda wrote:
> On May 13, 2009, at 10:40 AM, Fabio Viero wrote:
>
>> I need to do something like this:
>>
>> Someone sends an e-mail to u...@domain.com
>> Someone gets a reply from postfix saying "User has moved to
>> newu...@newdomain.com"
>> I need postfix
IIRC there's a limit for limiting outgoing smtp connections. I just
can't find it. Anyone a hint?
R.
--
___
It is better to remain silent and be thought a fool, than to speak
aloud and remove all doubt.
+---
Wietse Venema wrote:
> J Sloan:
>
>> Adrian Overbury wrote:
>>
>>> Has anyone ever written a proxy server for policy services? I have a
>>> policy server (grossd, one of the best greylisting engines I've ever
>>> used) that, if it goes down, causes my Postfix servers to temp fail
>>> every
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 08:54:18PM +0200, richard lucassen wrote:
> IIRC there's a limit for limiting outgoing smtp connections. I just
> can't find it. Anyone a hint?
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#default_process_limit
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtp_destination_conc
On Wednesday, May 13, 2009 at 20:54 CEST,
richard lucassen wrote:
> IIRC there's a limit for limiting outgoing smtp connections. I just
> can't find it. Anyone a hint?
Limiting in what sense? The total number of concurrent SMTP clients,
concurrency per destination, ...?
--
Magnus Bäck
mag
Fabio Viero wrote:
> Hi
>
> I need to do something like this:
>
> Someone sends an e-mail to u...@domain.com
> Someone gets a reply from postfix saying "User has moved to
> newu...@newdomain.com"
> I need postfix to STILL deliver the message to u...@domain.com (which
> doesn't happens)
>
> I tried
Use a policyd.
Cheers,
Ken
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 09:53:25PM +0200, Magnus B?ck wrote:
> On Wednesday, May 13, 2009 at 20:54 CEST,
> richard lucassen wrote:
>
> > IIRC there's a limit for limiting outgoing smtp connections. I just
> > can't find it. Anyone a hint?
>
> Limiting in what sen
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 02:57:44PM -0500, Kenneth Marshall wrote:
> > > IIRC there's a limit for limiting outgoing smtp connections. I just
> > > can't find it. Anyone a hint?
>
> Use a policyd.
No, policy daemons are only involved in incoming SMTP connections.
--
Viktor.
Disclaimer:
Sahil Tandon wrote:
>
> Google 'hapolicy synopsis' -- the author of postfwd wrote a perl
> script which acts as a load balancing policy service that can return
> dunno if the underlying services are unreachable. Obviously, if
> hapolicy itself malfunctions, you're back at square one.
Looks intere
Fabio Viero wrote:
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 2:54 PM, Scott Haneda wrote:
On May 13, 2009, at 10:40 AM, Fabio Viero wrote:
I need to do something like this:
Someone sends an e-mail to u...@domain.com
Someone gets a reply from postfix saying "User has moved to
newu...@newdomain.com"
I n
On Wed, 13 May 2009 21:53:25 +0200
Magnus Bäck wrote:
> > IIRC there's a limit for limiting outgoing smtp connections. I just
> > can't find it. Anyone a hint?
>
> Limiting in what sense? The total number of concurrent SMTP clients,
> concurrency per destination, ...?
No, just limit the number
On Wed, 13 May 2009 15:21:47 -0400
Victor Duchovni wrote:
> On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 08:54:18PM +0200, richard lucassen wrote:
>
> > IIRC there's a limit for limiting outgoing smtp connections. I just
> > can't find it. Anyone a hint?
>
> http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#default_proces
On May 13, 2009, at 1:08 PM, Randy wrote:
You can still do an auto-reply using scripts. Hand off the user's
message, then send it to the new location.
I used smtpd_recipient_restrictions and created a list. I then
passed this on to the autoresponder once a user/input validation
script made
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 03:59:58PM -0400, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 02:57:44PM -0500, Kenneth Marshall wrote:
>
> > > > IIRC there's a limit for limiting outgoing smtp connections. I just
> > > > can't find it. Anyone a hint?
> >
> > Use a policyd.
>
> No, policy daemons a
2009/5/13 Brian Evans - Postfix List :
> Fabio Viero wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> I need to do something like this:
>>
>> Someone sends an e-mail to u...@domain.com
>> Someone gets a reply from postfix saying "User has moved to
>> newu...@newdomain.com"
>> I need postfix to STILL deliver the message to u...@
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 03:39:56PM -0500, Kenneth Marshall wrote:
> On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 03:59:58PM -0400, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> > On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 02:57:44PM -0500, Kenneth Marshall wrote:
> >
> > > > > IIRC there's a limit for limiting outgoing smtp connections. I just
> > > > > ca
Adrian Overbury a écrit :
> Has anyone ever written a proxy server for policy services? I have a
> policy server (grossd, one of the best greylisting engines I've ever
> used) that, if it goes down, causes my Postfix servers to temp fail
> everything with 'Server configuration problem'. This is a
On Wednesday, May 13, 2009 at 22:09 CEST,
richard lucassen wrote:
> On Wed, 13 May 2009 15:21:47 -0400
> Victor Duchovni wrote:
[...]
> > http://www.postfix.org/master.5.html(Process limit)
>
> Wel, if I limit the number of smtpd processes, do I also limit the
> incoming connecti
On May 13, 2009, at 2:14 PM, mouss wrote:
Thank for any info or links to other docs I am missing.
There are problems with auto-responders:
- first, there is the backscatter problem (sending the reply to a
forged
address...).
- second, most auto-responders are broken, in so many ways.
so at
On Wed, 13 May 2009 22:58:01 +0200
Magnus Bäck wrote:
> > Wel, if I limit the number of smtpd processes, do I also limit the
> > incoming connections?
>
> Don't limit the number of smtpd processes; limit the number of smtp
> processes. Doing so won't affect the number of incoming connections.
O
Scott Haneda a écrit :
> On May 13, 2009, at 1:08 PM, Randy wrote:
>
>> You can still do an auto-reply using scripts. Hand off the user's
>> message, then send it to the new location.
>> I used smtpd_recipient_restrictions and created a list. I then passed
>> this on to the autoresponder once a us
Fabio Viero a écrit :
> 2009/5/13 Brian Evans - Postfix List :
>> Fabio Viero wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> I need to do something like this:
>>>
>>> Someone sends an e-mail to u...@domain.com
>>> Someone gets a reply from postfix saying "User has moved to
>>> newu...@newdomain.com"
>>> I need postfix to S
Guys - After implementing the main.cf on my Postfix server, I noticed
a increase in spam from before I modified my main.cf. Do you guys know
what could be causing this based on the changes I made to main.cf
below?
***OLD***
myhostname = mail.ideorlando.org
alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases
alias_dat
I noticed that Postfix V#2.6.0 is now out. Does anybody know where to
get RPM files? GOOGLE did not help.
Jennifer
On Wed, 13 May 2009, Pascal Maes wrote:
> Le 12-mai-09 à 15:17, Wietse Venema a écrit :
>
>> Postfix stable release 2.6.0 is available. After Postfix was declared
>> "complete" with version 2.3, the focus has moved towards improving
>> the code/documentation, and updating it for changing environme
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 04:07:39PM -0600, Just E. Mail wrote:
> I noticed that Postfix V#2.6.0 is now out. Does anybody know where to get
> RPM files? GOOGLE did not help.
If the purpose of using RPM files is to facilitate binary updates from
distribution servers, wait until *your distribution*
Is there some rule about submitting questions with the string "Help" in
the subject? I've tried posting the following note with the subject of
"Help With header_checks" and received a bounce message indicating this
error:
BOUNCE postfix-users@postfix.org: Admin request: /^subject:\s*help\b/i
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 06:59:09PM -0400, Sahil Tandon wrote:
> > We have installed the new version of postfix and we see the following
> > situation :
> >
> > # tail -f /var/log/mail.log | grep 10025
> > May 13 09:18:13 smtp-1 postfix/smtpd[26441]: warning: proxy
> > 127.0.0.1:10025 rejected
Victor Duchovni:
> On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 04:07:39PM -0600, Just E. Mail wrote:
>
> > I noticed that Postfix V#2.6.0 is now out. Does anybody know where to get
> > RPM files? GOOGLE did not help.
>
> If the purpose of using RPM files is to facilitate binary updates from
> distribution servers,
Drew Tomlinson:
> I'm using postfix 2.5.6,1 and have been using postfix for a long time.
> In older versions, to perform header checks, I had a text file and would
> then have to run postmap to create the header_check.db file. Is this
This has never been necessary, if you wanted to use the fi
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 07:26:34PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > > I noticed that Postfix V#2.6.0 is now out. Does anybody know where to get
> > > RPM files? GOOGLE did not help.
> >
> > If the purpose of using RPM files is to facilitate binary updates from
> > distribution servers, wait until
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
> [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Victor Duchovni
> Sent: Thursday, 14 May 2009 9:04 AM
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Subject: Re: Postfix-2.6.0 RPM
>
> On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 04:07:39PM -0600, Just
Victor Duchovni wrote:
> On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 04:07:39PM -0600, Just E. Mail wrote:
>
>
>> I noticed that Postfix V#2.6.0 is now out. Does anybody know where to get
>> RPM files? GOOGLE did not help.
>>
>
> If the purpose of using RPM files is to facilitate binary updates from
> distrib
Not only am I not competent to install Postfix, I should learn to type.
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 10:01 PM, Fabio Viero wrote:
>> look again at the example that Brian proposed. the virtual alias
>> contains _two_ (2) addresses.
>>
>> if it is not clear, use something like this:
>>
>> u...@example.com u...@example.com, u...@relocated.example.com
>>
>>
>> then conf
I have problem with my postfix, a few days ago my smtpd running very
slow, when delivering message (using MUA outlook,TB,OE) message
delivering very slow, but if user using web mail which is using
openwebmail the deliver running fine without the delay, I came to
conclusion that, when postfix sendin
Hi!
I made a litle shell script to stoping bootnets and zombis, and I want
know what you think about it.
The purpose is drop via iptables hosts that are rejected several
times in a litle space of time, reading the log generated by postfix.
Tested in a Linux box.
The script is so poor,
Hi!
Sorry!
You must configure your path to postfix mail log and iptables. Edit the
script pf-ip-killer and set the variables to your enviroment.
[]'s
-
_Julio Cesar Covolato
0v0
/(_)\ F: 55-11-3129-3366
^ ^ PSI INTERNET
--
* Julio Cesar Covolato (ju...@psi.com.br) [090514 07:26]:
> Hi!
>
> I made a litle shell script to stoping bootnets and zombis, and I want
> know what you think about it.
>
> The purpose is drop via iptables hosts that are rejected several
> times in a litle space of time, reading the log
66 matches
Mail list logo
