Hi,
I have a local mail server installed inside the LAN. From the Firewall all port
25 traffic is being delivered to this mail server. I am trying to add
disclaimer on the local mail server for the outgoing emails. There is only one
interface for outgoing and incoming mail on to mail server. I
Hi to all,
i have a question about postfix logging system.
The normal logging system, print in a log file the message-id of email:
May 18 04:02:14 fe postfix/cleanup[28007]: 4507B1E8621:
message-id=<20090518020214.4507b1e8...@fe.example.org>
Can I configure my postfix to log the message-id forea
Giovanni Mancuso:
> Hi to all,
> i have a question about postfix logging system.
>
> The normal logging system, print in a log file the message-id of email:
>
> May 18 04:02:14 fe postfix/cleanup[28007]: 4507B1E8621:
> message-id=<20090518020214.4507b1e8...@fe.example.org>
>
> Can I configure my
I am using postfix 2.5. I am configuring a centralized log server
using rsyslog. Have anybody worked on it. Or any how to or rsyslog
template for doing it. I want logs to be inserted in MYSQL.
The Log Message should be in the format
DateQueue ID Message ID From To S
Ashwin Muni schrieb:
> I am using postfix 2.5. I am configuring a centralized log server
> using rsyslog. Have anybody worked on it. Or any how to or rsyslog
> template for doing it. I want logs to be inserted in MYSQL.
>
> The Log Message should be in the format
>
> DateQueue ID Mess
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ashwin Muni said the following on 18/05/09 13:22:
> I am using postfix 2.5. I am configuring a centralized log server
> using rsyslog. Have anybody worked on it. Or any how to or rsyslog
> template for doing it. I want logs to be inserted in MYSQL.
Yo
Hello,
Do not contradict the expert.
You must find out the parent process of the zombies. In the output
from "ps axl" commands, this is shown in the PPID column (use "ps
-el" on Solaris and other SYS5-ish platforms).
The parent process is not cleaning up as it should.
Wietse
Oh no, i do n
Andre H?bner:
> In some cases i find in log following line:
> process id x: command time limit exceeded
> written $command_time_limit seconds (default) after starting the
> policychild. I do not really know how to handle this.
RTFM http://www.postfix.org/SMTPD_POLICY_README.html
Wiet
On 18-May-2009, at 04:49, Wietse Venema wrote:
Giovanni Mancuso:
Hi to all,
i have a question about postfix logging system.
The normal logging system, print in a log file the message-id of
email:
May 18 04:02:14 fe postfix/cleanup[28007]: 4507B1E8621:
message-id=<20090518020214.4507b1e8...@
OK, I'm using SMTP with TLS, and I'd like to eliminate part of the
header it generates;
Received: from system (ip-address [1.2.3.4])
(using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mail.some.serverdomain (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 75F61C
Hi All,
I'm new to postfix, I've currently setup the postfix with SMTP AUTH and
it works very well, when I'm sending mails outside of my own domain.
However, when I send a mail to my own domain it doesn't ask for the
authentication which is a problem because someone can send a mail using m
* Janaka Wickramasinghe :
> Hi All,
>
>I'm new to postfix, I've currently setup the postfix with SMTP AUTH and
> it works very well, when I'm sending mails outside of my own domain.
>
> However, when I send a mail to my own domain it doesn't ask for the
> authentication which is a problem
On 18-May-2009, at 03:24, bijayant kumar wrote:
I am trying to add disclaimer on the local mail server for the
outgoing emails.
Oh god no, don't. Please, please don't.
And as a point of reference, anytime I get an email with a
'confidential' or 'copyright' disclaimer, I put it on my webser
Message initial
De: Patrick Ben Koetter
À: postfix-users@postfix.org
Sujet: Re: Postfix SASL didn't query saslauthd whereas smtp.conf is set
Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 22:02:00 +0200
* David Touzeau :
> I use SASL connected to ldap server trough saslauthd daemon
> I don't understan
Dear
I have installed Postfix 2.6 in order to run milters addons
In postfix 2.5, milter-greylist claim :
milter-greylist: smfi_getsymval failed for {if_addr}
-
Hi
Is it normal that when connection to the SMTP engine is performed it
takes 4-6 sec. before greeting is presented?
I suspect it is doing some DNS lookup on the client? - can it be
disabled for IPs?
Thanks
Felix
Julius Thijssen wrote:
OK, I'm using SMTP with TLS, and I'd like to eliminate part of the
header it generates;
Received: from system (ip-address [1.2.3.4])
(using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mail.some.serverdomain (Postfi
David Touzeau:
> Dear
>
> I have installed Postfix 2.6 in order to run milters addons
>
> In postfix 2.5, milter-greylist claim :
>
> milter-greylist: smfi_getsymval failed for {if_addr}
> --
J Sloan schrieb:
> I'm going to try out hapolicy first, since it's quite a bit quicker and
> cheaper to set up than full blown mysql replication.
>
hapolicy (http://postfwd.org/DEVEL/tools/hapolicy-0.99.1) was developed
to be small (~200 lines perl), simple and reliable. therefore it uses
only
Thanks Luigi for the reply can you please tell me how to parse rsyslog
to get the desired results using pglogsumm.
Thanks in Advance
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 5:07 PM, Luigi Rosa wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Ashwin Muni said the following on 18/05/09 13:22:
>> I am
rsyslog can log directly to a database backend.
Cheers,
Ken
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 08:57:33PM +0530, Ashwin Muni wrote:
> Thanks Luigi for the reply can you please tell me how to parse rsyslog
> to get the desired results using pglogsumm.
>
> Thanks in Advance
>
> On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 5:07
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 09:42:08AM -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
> IF /^Received: .*by mail.my.domain/
> IF /no client certificate/
> /(.*)\(No client certificate requested\)(.*)/
> REPLACE $1 $2
> ENDIF
> ENDIF
This will leave a blank line in the middle of the folded header, which
violates RFC5322.
On Thu, May 14, 2009 07:23, Julio Cesar Covolato wrote:
> Download pf-ip-killer :
> http://psi.com.br/~julio/postfix/pf-ip-killer.tgz
nice script but have you tryed
http://www.fail2ban.org/wiki/index.php/Postfix ?
here i hook fail2ban into shorewall allow|drop|reject that way i do
not mess wit
On Fri, May 15, 2009 09:24, Corey Chandler wrote:
> fail2ban interfaces with iptables.
> FreeBSD uses pf.
and fail2ban works with pf also it just need another action.conf to pf
> That little bit of trivia aside, the firewall is a kernel builtin; it's
> not a daemon. Perhaps that makes a differe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ashwin Muni said the following on 18/05/09 17:27:
> Thanks Luigi for the reply can you please tell me how to parse rsyslog
> to get the desired results using pglogsumm.
That really depends on what you need from Postfix log data.
You can take a look a
Jan P. Kessler wrote:
>
> hapolicy (http://postfwd.org/DEVEL/tools/hapolicy-0.99.1) was developed
> to be small (~200 lines perl), simple and reliable. therefore it uses
> only basic perl modules and relies on postfix spawn. we run it since
> more than 6 months without problems to have a shared gre
lis...@newnanutilities.org ("Brian Collins") writes:
> > I noticed that Postfix V#2.6.0 is now out. Does anybody know where to
> > get RPM files? GOOGLE did not help.
>
> Simon Mudd picks up the releases and makes good source and binary RPMs from
> them with lots of options. However, he's a busy
> From: Victor.Duchovni@
> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 12:42:01PM -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
>
>> wiskbr...@hotmail.com wrote:
> Here are the contents of my /etc/postfix/blocked_senders file:
>
> "operator#...@somephishingbanksite\.com" REJECT
The above line is the wrong syntax and wil
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 08:38:54PM +0200, Simon J Mudd wrote:
> Others ask why not build from source. The simplicity of a single upgrade
> procedure and reproducibility make this more favourable the more boxes
> you have to manage. For those of us who have hundres of boxes to manage
> this makes l
Yves Kreis:
> Dear,
>
> Is it (technically) possible to implement SRS or RPR in Postfix using
> either a milter plugin or a policy? Does anyone know of such an
> implementation?
Postfix 2.6.0 (stable release) and later support sender address
replacement by milter plugins. You're welcome to gi
>
> I'll see if I can make some time to build some 2.6 rpms, but am likely
> to respond more if there are people who show an interest in these
> rpms I build.
>
[DH] +1 for interest. I have begun building mail servers on multiple
VPS's using CentOS and I use your RPM's all the time. I'd be very
A new email gateway I am building is sending email with empty subject, empty
body,
and the internal from starts with "Postfix After-Queue Content Filter:.
It is possible an external filter is the culprit, but it appears to me as if
postfix is actually
stripping the missing information, due to some
On Tue, May 19, 2009 6:41 am, Dan Horne wrote:
>>
>> I'll see if I can make some time to build some 2.6 rpms, but am likely
>> to respond more if there are people who show an interest in these rpms I
>> build.
>>
> [DH] +1 for interest. I have begun building mail servers on multiple
> VPS's usin
Robert Lopez:
> A new email gateway I am building is sending email with empty subject, empty
> body,
> and the internal from starts with "Postfix After-Queue Content Filter:.
You need to undo your changes one by one until you find the one
that causes the problem.
Wietse
Hello list,
When building out the various checks available to postfix, is there a
mechanism for doing a REJECT, WARN or OK plus the reason, en mass,
without pasting the same text a lot? For example...
bad.guy01.com REJECT 550 Reason1
bad.guy02.com REJECT 550 Reason1
.
.
.
bad.guy50.com REJECT
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 08:52:45PM -0400, Jon wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> When building out the various checks available to postfix, is there a
> mechanism for doing a REJECT, WARN or OK plus the reason, en mass, without
> pasting the same text a lot? For example...
>
> bad.guy01.com REJECT 550 Rea
Carlos Williams a écrit :
> I am using a new Postfix server and when I send an email to anyone,
when you say "I send", what do you exactly do? what software do you use?
what actions do you take?
On 17-May-2009, at 19:44, Carlos Williams wrote:
u...@mail.myserver.com
myserver.com is a real domain name. Is it YOUR domain name? Somehow I
doubt it.
Use example.com, example.net, example.org, etc. Or use an impossible
name like mydomain.tld, foobar.tld, &c. when obfuscating. Oh, and
On May 18, 2009, at 8:08 PM, LuKreme wrote:
On 17-May-2009, at 19:44, Carlos Williams wrote:
u...@mail.myserver.com
myserver.com is a real domain name. Is it YOUR domain name? Somehow
I doubt it.
Thank you for pointing this out. I feel bad for anyone at domain,
company, foo, bar, foob
On 18-May-2009, at 21:47, Scott Haneda wrote:
Glad you brought this up, often times I am using example.com and
then ns.example.com and imap.example.com and want to refer to
something else outside of example.com.
At least example.net and example.org in addition to example.com, so
you can e
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
A customer asked me to think about a new email topology for a company with four
offices, each on one of the four corners of this planet and a lot of people
moving from one office to the other.
For various reasons I cannot put the mail server on as hos
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 08:47:09PM -0700, Scott Haneda wrote:
>> Use example.com, example.net, example.org, etc. Or use an impossible name
>> like mydomain.tld, foobar.tld, &c. when obfuscating. Oh, and obfuscating
>> on this list is generally a waste of time and makes it harder for people
>> t
On May 18, 2009, at 9:15 PM, LuKreme wrote:
On 18-May-2009, at 21:47, Scott Haneda wrote:
Glad you brought this up, often times I am using example.com and
then ns.example.com and imap.example.com and want to refer to
something else outside of example.com.
At least example.net and example.o
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 06:16:01AM +0200, Luigi Rosa wrote:
> My idea is to declare the MX of the organization the headquarter of the
> organization
Not unusual.
> and route via Internet the email of other local offices to local
> servers.
Likewise.
> The only problem is that I have to manage
On Mon, May 18, 2009 14:48:12 PM -0400, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> I, for one, would urge the more sophisticated users, who need the
> latest release, to learn how to use/build source RPMs, and build the
> official Postfix release via source RPM that resembles the vendor's
> support source RPM, but
On Mon, May 18, 2009 20:38:54 PM +0200, Simon J Mudd wrote:
> I'll see if I can make some time to build some 2.6 rpms, but am
> likely to respond more if there are people who show an interest in
> these rpms I build.
+1 for me, thanks if you find the time!
Marco
--
Your own civil rights and th
46 matches
Mail list logo
