reject sender login mismatch only for some accaounts

2009-06-11 Thread ram
Can I implement smtp_sender_login_maps such a way that * for selective accountids reject_sender_login_mismatch * And the for the rest Permit any sender id if authenticated

Multiple Milters

2009-06-11 Thread Ihsan Dogan
Hello, I'm running two spamfilters on two machines, which are accessed with milter. In case of an error (eg: the first milter service is not running), I would like that Postfix wold use the second one on the other host. I was expecting something something like this: smtpd_milters =

Re: reject sender login mismatch only for some accaounts

2009-06-11 Thread Darren Pilgrim
ram wrote: Can I implement smtp_sender_login_maps such a way that * for selective accountids reject_sender_login_mismatch * And the for the rest Permit any sender id if authenticated smtp_sender_login_maps works the other way around (it maps MAIL FROM to SASL login). What you want

Re: handling non MX entry domains

2009-06-11 Thread Truth Seeker
Alternatively, the OP could use a transport map to reroute stuck messages to the error transport and bounce them back to the sender with an informative message. what is this OP you mean? how can we do this? may be this is what i am exactly looking for...

Re: Spamassasin in Postfix Server

2009-06-11 Thread Robert Schetterer
Truth Seeker schrieb: Any response for this queries is really appreciated!!! --- On Wed, 6/10/09, Truth Seeker truth_seeker_3...@yahoo.com wrote: From: Truth Seeker truth_seeker_3...@yahoo.com Subject: Spamassasin in Postfix Server To: postfix-users@postfix.org Date: Wednesday, June

Re: relays not connecting msexchange

2009-06-11 Thread Charles Marcus
On 6/11/2009 3:12 AM, K bharathan wrote: till yesterday there're no probs; suddenly two of my postfix relays not connecting the exchange2003; i cannot ping or telnet from the relays to exchange; exchange has got symantec endpoint protection and its firewall; what could've gone wrong! Per the

Re: Multiple Milters

2009-06-11 Thread Wietse Venema
Ihsan Dogan: Hello,^M ^M I'm running two spamfilters on two machines, which are accessed with^M milter. In case of an error (eg: the first milter service is not running),^M I would like that Postfix wold use the second one on the other host.^M ^M I was expecting something something like

Re: getting an address in virtual_alias_maps to use different transport

2009-06-11 Thread Calvin Browne
Thanks - I had seen that online - but made several errors setting it up (like not setting maxproc to one). having corrected those, I am now queueing the mail one at a time. Some strange behaviour however - the wait between deliveries seems to bear no relation to what I set smtp_connect_timeout to

Re: Multiple Milters

2009-06-11 Thread Kouhei Sutou
Hi, In 5f0a4d43797f50decd8590a59d9e6...@localhost Multiple Milters on Thu, 11 Jun 2009 09:27:11 +0200, Ihsan Dogan ih...@dogan.ch wrote: I'm running two spamfilters on two machines, which are accessed with milter. In case of an error (eg: the first milter service is not running), I would

Re: order of local_recipient_maps, smtpd_recipient_restrictions

2009-06-11 Thread Wietse Venema
Stefan Palme: Hi all, local_recipient_maps .vs. smtpd_recipient_restrictions - can anybody tell me which test happens first on incoming emails? If you don't specify smtpd_*_restrictions = ... reject_unlisted_recipient ... (which searches local_recipient_maps, relay_recipient_maps

Re: order of local_recipient_maps, smtpd_recipient_restrictions

2009-06-11 Thread Stefan Palme
On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 13:54 +0200, Magnus Bäck wrote: On Thu, June 11, 2009 1:03 pm, Stefan Palme said: local_recipient_maps .vs. smtpd_recipient_restrictions - can anybody tell me which test happens first on incoming emails? You're comparing apples and oranges, but I understand what you

Re: order of local_recipient_maps, smtpd_recipient_restrictions

2009-06-11 Thread Wietse Venema
Stefan Palme: [ Charset ISO-8859-15 unsupported, converting... ] On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 13:54 +0200, Magnus B_ck wrote: On Thu, June 11, 2009 1:03 pm, Stefan Palme said: local_recipient_maps .vs. smtpd_recipient_restrictions - can anybody tell me which test happens first on incoming

Re: order of local_recipient_maps, smtpd_recipient_restrictions

2009-06-11 Thread Magnus Bäck
On Thu, June 11, 2009 2:13 pm, Stefan Palme said: On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 13:54 +0200, Magnus Bäck wrote: You're comparing apples and oranges, but I understand what you mean. local_recipient_maps specifies lookup tables that Postfix will consult if the recipient address domain is local

Re: anvil

2009-06-11 Thread Simon Jones
2009/6/10 Ralf Hildebrandt ralf.hildebra...@charite.de: * Simon Jones simonmjo...@gmail.com: This is the part I'm missing, how do I enable the shit flinger? You COULD use smtp_source OR your could set ridiculous low limits (1/60s) and then test it manually using telnet. Keep in mind,

Re: anvil

2009-06-11 Thread Simon Jones
2009/6/11 Simon Jones simonmjo...@gmail.com: 2009/6/10 Ralf Hildebrandt ralf.hildebra...@charite.de: * Simon Jones simonmjo...@gmail.com: This is the part I'm missing, how do I enable the shit flinger? You COULD use smtp_source OR your could set ridiculous low limits (1/60s) and then

Re: relays not connecting msexchange

2009-06-11 Thread Brian Evans - Postfix List
K bharathan wrote: i get the logs like the following: Jun 10 15:18:33 relay1 postfix/smtp[9353]: 574501614EC: to=a...@example.com mailto:a...@example.com, relay=none, delay=12531, delays=12501/0.28/30/0, d sn=4.4.1, status=deferred (connect to 192.168.20.240[192.168.20.240] : Connection

Re: How to discern from postfix log between TO and THROUGH sending a correspondence?

2009-06-11 Thread Victor Duchovni
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 08:45:34PM +0700, Sthu Pous wrote: Do You know a way how I can track an local application/process that called postfix to send a messages (on a hacked system)? The only thing recorded by Postfix is either the SMTP client source IP address (and optionally the source port)

Re: what is the meaning???

2009-06-11 Thread Barney Desmond
009/6/10 Truth Seeker truth_seeker_3...@yahoo.com: now to do flushing for a particular domain, i am trying to configure fast flush service. in the documentation i found the following line, which i am confused. could anyone explain this further As mentioned in the introduction, the mail is

Re: Catchall not working

2009-06-11 Thread Noel Jones
Gary Smith wrote: Noel, I created a file /etc/postfix/custom/mydestination and put my entry in there (hash) and added the following lines to /etc/postfix/main.cf (only changes made to a stock 2.5.5 config) mydestination =

Message with 300,000+ recips via alias_maps

2009-06-11 Thread dan trainor
Hello, all - I've sent an email through Postfix which has one recipient, which is an alias via alias_maps (mysql lookup table). I've had just a little bit of experience with this type of delivery, but not a lot of experience with this many final recipients. Right now I see the message sitting

RE: Catchall not working

2009-06-11 Thread Gary Smith
Bingo... That will teach me to not put my quick changes in the top of the file... Thanks, Gary From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Noel Jones [njo...@megan.vbhcs.org] Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009

Re: Message with 300,000+ recips via alias_maps

2009-06-11 Thread Wietse Venema
dan trainor: Hello, all - I've sent an email through Postfix which has one recipient, which is an alias via alias_maps (mysql lookup table). I've had just a little bit of experience with this type of delivery, but not a lot of experience with this many final recipients. Right now I see

RE: Catchall not working

2009-06-11 Thread Gary Smith
Noel, Here is what I ended with. I had to add a virtual_alias_maps as the email address is different the the one we have been sending (and because of the auth system on this box) mydestination = $myhostname, localhost.$mydomain, localhost, hash:/etc/postfix/custom/mydestination

Re: Message with 300,000+ recips via alias_maps

2009-06-11 Thread dan trainor
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 1:32 PM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote: dan trainor: Hello, all - I've sent an email through Postfix which has one recipient, which is an alias via alias_maps (mysql lookup table). I've had just a little bit of experience with this type of delivery,