On Mon, 28 Dec 2009 22:35:31 you wrote:
Hi!!
That only works for mailbox kind of mail mailbox. If you're running
maildir++ (courier... for example) or cyrus support you could try :
http://postfixquotareject.ramattack.net.
Bye!!!
I am running mailbox and the hard coded
Michael a écrit :
Is the following configuration directives supported out of the box or do
these
require a 3rd party patch? I obtained these from another site, however it
made reference to an RPM file, whereas I am using source so it wasn't clear.
virtual_mailbox_limit = 104857600
Am 28.12.2009 08:08, schrieb Michael:
Is the following configuration directives supported out of the box or do
these
require a 3rd party patch? I obtained these from another site, however it
made reference to an RPM file, whereas I am using source so it wasn't clear.
Your problem description is useful, but actual logging that corresponds
to your situation and the output of 'postconf -n' are required. Please
see DEBUG_README (a document to which you were linked upon joining this
mailing list) for tips on seeking help here.
Thanks for the response.
-
Frank Cusack:
I can't get the relay_recipient_maps lookup to ignore the address
extension part of a recipient email address. It's very difficult to
use address extensions together with relay_recipient_maps this way.
Am I missing some configuration setting? I've been searching for it
for
When the recipient domain matches mydestination (or any IP address
literal that matches inet_interfaces or proxy_interfaces).
1) local(8) will accept the recipient ONLY if the username is
found. It does not look for usern...@domain.
2) However, smtpd(8) will accept the recipient if either the
FreeBSD-7.2 with Postfix (2.7-20091115) from the FreeBSD ports system.
This is my first attempt to get SPF working. I installed
postfix-policyd-spf-perl via the ports system and followed the
directions (I think). I added this to the 'master.cf' file:
spf-policy unix - n n -
On Mon, 28 Dec 2009 09:15:05 -0500, Jerry postfix.u...@yahoo.com wrote:
That section now looks like this:
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
permit_sasl_authenticated
permit_mynetworks
reject_unauth_destination
check_policy_service unix:private/spf-policy
reject
You're sure that the
So, be sure that you don't have u...@domain forms in $alias_maps.
Thanks. Every line in the alias files defined in $alias_maps is of the
following form:
USER: u...@subx.domain.com
We are not using the form u...@domain for alias entries (instead just
USER). I would like to inform again that
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 12:00:34AM +0100, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
Hi.
I'm still trying to understand some things, so perhaps some of you could
help me.
1) As far as I understood the address rewriting manual, rewriting
(including the app...@origin and append.domain) happens in
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 12:32:51PM -0500, Terry Carmen wrote:
On 12/27/2009 11:28 PM, Satish Kumar P wrote:
1. unknown user (this is really strange, if the user were unknown,
postfix/smtpd would have rejected the recipient at SMTP connection
itself)
2. mail forwarding loop for
On 12/27/2009 11:28 PM, Satish Kumar P wrote:
1. unknown user (this is really strange, if the user were unknown,
postfix/smtpd would have rejected the recipient at SMTP connection
itself)
2. mail forwarding loop for x...@domain.com (though we are pretty
sure that the mail came to this server
Dne 9.12.2009 v 09:45 Michal Kurka napsal(a):
Dne 6.12.2009 v 10:41 Michal Kurka napsal(a):
I need resolve whether incoming mail for the recipient accept or defer
or reject according to some rule of local username(s) (of course, if the
recipient corresponds to local username),
Hi,
The only officially supported quota enforcing method is for mailbox mailboxes .
There are too other quota limit software like vda or postfixquotareject wich
can achieve you're goal. Vda was that you seem to have installed... another
method is postfixquotareject wich just works fine too but
I don't know what the correct terminology is for my question - please
adjust my wording as needed.
When a user mistypes a remote e-mail address (not that THAT ever
happens!), the result is typically either a user unknown, invalid
recipient, or host or domain not found message. At least for
Michal Kurka:
Dne 9.12.2009 v 09:45 Michal Kurka napsal(a):
Dne 6.12.2009 v 10:41 Michal Kurka napsal(a):
I need resolve whether incoming mail for the recipient accept or
defer
or reject according to some rule of local username(s) (of course, if the
recipient corresponds
satishkumarp2k1:
So, be sure that you don't have u...@domain forms in $alias_maps.
Thanks. Every line in the alias files defined in $alias_maps is of the
following form:
USER: u...@subx.domain.com
We are not using the form u...@domain for alias entries (instead just
USER). I
Daniel L. Miller:
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
I don't know what the correct terminology is for my question - please
adjust my wording as needed.
When a user mistypes a remote e-mail address (not that THAT ever
happens!), the result is typically either a user unknown,
On Mon, 28 Dec 2009, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
I don't know what the correct terminology is for my question -
please adjust my wording as needed.
When a user mistypes a remote e-mail address (not that THAT ever
happens!), the result is typically either a user unknown, invalid
recipient, or
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 05:56:48PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
satishkumarp2k1:
...
According to the main.cf information in the problem report,
local_recipient_maps=$alias_maps and all those maps are local
files, so that would exclude the usual nsswitch foul-ups.
There are no confirmed
On Mon, 2009-12-28 at 14:27 -0500, Victor Duchovni wrote:
The trivial-rewrite service does the rewriting, and the cleanup service
updates the queue-file updating addresses in headers, ...
No, but smtpd(8) uses normalized (via trivial-rewrite) recipient
and sender addresses to make access
What if anything is the difference between virtual_maps and
virtual_alias_maps ?
I have just discovered on a production mail server that it doesn't like
running both of these together (pointing to different SQL tables)
Is there any difference in the operation of these two or can I just
Michael:
What if anything is the difference between virtual_maps and
virtual_alias_maps ?
virtual_maps is the obsolete name. It is still supported because
I am always concerned with backwards compatibility.
Wietse
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 01:33:15PM +1300, Michael wrote:
What if anything is the difference between virtual_maps and
virtual_alias_maps ?
1. alias_ ;)
2. Deprecation of $virtual_maps since Postfix 2.0
http://www.postfix.org/VIRTUAL_README.html#virtual_alias
Is the alias table generated dynamically? It is possible that it's not
readable (still being written) at the time the lookup happens?
Yes, correct. All the alias files are generated using perl scripts, which
run periodically. The scripts actually generate temporary alias files (while
satishkumarp2k1 put forth on 12/28/2009 9:29 PM:
Yes, correct. All the alias files are generated using perl scripts, which
run periodically. The scripts actually generate temporary alias files (while
generating the aliases) and then just use mv command to the actual alias
file. Do you still
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 12:59:13AM +0100, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
On Mon, 2009-12-28 at 14:27 -0500, Victor Duchovni wrote:
The trivial-rewrite service does the rewriting, and the cleanup service
updates the queue-file updating addresses in headers, ...
No, but smtpd(8) uses
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 10:51:47PM -0600, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
satishkumarp2k1 put forth on 12/28/2009 9:29 PM:
Yes, correct. All the alias files are generated using perl scripts, which
run periodically. The scripts actually generate temporary alias files (while
generating the aliases)
28 matches
Mail list logo
