Hello fellow Postfix users,
I am attempting to configure a postfix server for multiple domains,
which will use a milter to send an email to a mailarchiving store
(mailarchiva). What I would like to do is:
Match the originating domain in outbound mail using a hash table or sql
lookup and use
A very very good news :-)
Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
> * Julien Vehent :
>
>> On Wed, 27 Jan 2010 19:29:17 +0100, Patrick Ben Koetter
>> wrote:
>>
>>> * JORGE CARMINATI :
>>>
Hi! I just want to know if the authors of this book are planning to
release
an updated rev
* Julien Vehent :
> On Wed, 27 Jan 2010 19:29:17 +0100, Patrick Ben Koetter
> wrote:
> > * JORGE CARMINATI :
> >> Hi! I just want to know if the authors of this book are planning to
> >> release
> >> an updated revision with erratas fixes, etc and when (if applies).
> >> Thanks
> >> in advance.
>
Hi All,
Very intresting problem from my postfix server to BorderWare MXtreme
Mail Firewall SMTP 1)
In some rare case remote smtp server replies: said: 451 Error:
internal error 512 (in reply to end of DATA command))
I think this is bug on BorderWare MXtreme Mail Firewall SMTP server?,
but how t
On Tue, 2010-01-26 at 10:33:41 -0600, adrian ilarion ciobanu wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 04:06:29PM +0100, Erik Sonn wrote:
> >
> > Dear everyone,
> >
> > I'm working on some Antispam-Proxy, using Postfix as MTA. Postfix is
> > 2.6.2-RC1 on an Ubuntu 8.04 LTS base-system.
> >
> >
> > Preco
On Wed, 27 Jan 2010 19:29:17 +0100, Patrick Ben Koetter
wrote:
> * JORGE CARMINATI :
>> Hi! I just want to know if the authors of this book are planning to
>> release
>> an updated revision with erratas fixes, etc and when (if applies).
>> Thanks
>> in advance.
>
> Good news: We are in the middl
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 03:40:43PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> 1) What is the need for ATRN in the first place? What are the
> options (VPN, ETRN + dynamic DNS, ...). I find almost no information
> about supported ATRN solutions with other major MTAs (not counting
> qmail patches here), so it is
Hi Stan,
Well, according to our appliance, it's processing about 240,000 emails a day.
Our other mail filtering system, which is essentially an ancient in-house
wrapper for Spamassassin that speaks libmilter to a couple old sendmail boxen,
is a little harder to pin down. SNMP polling shows a
Jorge Armando Medina wrote:
> Javier Fox wrote:
>
>> Greetings,
>>
>> I've inherited a rather kludgy email system consisting of an
>> overpriced, underpowered spam filtering appliance which I would very
>> much like to replace with a simple *nix box running Postfix and some
>> manner of spam fil
Stan Hoeppner put forth on 1/27/2010 9:47 PM:
> http://www.postfix.org/STANDARD_CONFIGURATION_README.html#firewall
> http://www.postfix.org/CONTENT_INSPECTION_README.html
> http://www.postfix.org/SMTPD_PROXY_README.html
> http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtpd_recipient_restrictions
> http:/
Javier Fox wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I've inherited a rather kludgy email system consisting of an
> overpriced, underpowered spam filtering appliance which I would very
> much like to replace with a simple *nix box running Postfix and some
> manner of spam filtering software (ie spamassassin).
I alre
Many thanks, Sahil and Stan. Just knowing the right terminology to address the
situation by is a big help. I hate to sound like such an amateur but thus far
I've been focusing my Sysadmin work on everything except email administration,
so it's been an uphill battle.
Thanks again folks, this
Javier Fox put forth on 1/27/2010 7:57 PM:
> Greetings,
>
> I've inherited a rather kludgy email system consisting of an overpriced,
> underpowered spam filtering appliance which I would very much like to
> replace with a simple *nix box running Postfix and some manner of spam
> filtering software
On Wed, 27 Jan 2010, Javier Fox wrote:
> -MX for domain points to the spam filtering appliance -Appliance
> handles user verification (via ldap), rejection, quarantine, etc
> -'Clean' mail handed off to MTA for final delivery
>
> The slightly funky part is that there are a number of destination M
Greetings,
I've inherited a rather kludgy email system consisting of an overpriced,
underpowered spam filtering appliance which I would very much like to replace
with a simple *nix box running Postfix and some manner of spam filtering
software (ie spamassassin).
I would like to be able to kee
On 1/27/2010 4:10 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Noel Jones:
use a regexp or pcre check_sender_access map. A very basic
example:
# /etc/postfix/sender_access.regexp
/^@/ REJECT invalid recipient
This does not have the expected result. Postfix strips off the
obsolete source route syntax before acc
Noel Jones:
> use a regexp or pcre check_sender_access map. A very basic
> example:
>
> # /etc/postfix/sender_access.regexp
> /^@/ REJECT invalid recipient
This does not have the expected result. Postfix strips off the
obsolete source route syntax before access maps see the address.
W
Curtis H. Wilbar Jr.:
> Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Curtis H. Wilbar Jr.:
> >
> >> Running a Postfix 2.2 server...
> >>
> >> The server won't accept u...@somewhereelse.com@ourserver.com
> >>
> >> But, it is accepting @somewhereelse.com:u...@ourserver.com
> >>
> >
> > This is historical syntax,
On 1/27/2010 3:37 PM, Curtis H. Wilbar Jr. wrote:
Wietse Venema wrote:
Curtis H. Wilbar Jr.:
Running a Postfix 2.2 server...
The server won't accept u...@somewhereelse.com@ourserver.com
But, it is accepting @somewhereelse.com:u...@ourserver.com
This is historical syntax, and is deprecated.
Wietse Venema wrote:
Curtis H. Wilbar Jr.:
Running a Postfix 2.2 server...
The server won't accept u...@somewhereelse.com@ourserver.com
But, it is accepting @somewhereelse.com:u...@ourserver.com
This is historical syntax, and is deprecated.
For compatibility, Postfix accepts the syn
Curtis H. Wilbar Jr.:
>
> Running a Postfix 2.2 server...
>
> The server won't accept u...@somewhereelse.com@ourserver.com
>
> But, it is accepting @somewhereelse.com:u...@ourserver.com
This is historical syntax, and is deprecated.
For compatibility, Postfix accepts the syntax and processes it
Running a Postfix 2.2 server...
The server won't accept u...@somewhereelse.com@ourserver.com
But, it is accepting @somewhereelse.com:u...@ourserver.com
We will be upgrading Postfix soon, but in the meantime, how do I best
block this ?
we have permit_sasl_authenticated, permit_mynetworks, and
adrian ilarion ciobanu:
> I'd say the sasl authorization map IS the transport map. The sasl
> authorization (not the authentication that is ofcourse outside
> atrnd) can be resolved when atrnd
> does the lookup domain<->user
> transport looks like:
>
> domainA atrn:user1
> domainB atrn:user1
> dom
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 3:16 PM, Larry Stone wrote:
> I think you are still not getting what an MX does.
Thanks Larry, you've answered my questions.
And yes, I have some reading to do!
Thanks again.
--
“Don't eat anything you've ever seen advertised on TV”
- Michael Pollan, author
On Wed, 27 Jan 2010, Alan McKay wrote:
you need an MX for the domains you use in the envelope sender and
From/reply-To headers, not for a "box". The MX says which server to send
this or that mail to.
So let's assume I have mail.example.com as my Kerio server, at IP
10.11.12.13, and relay.examp
> Does any Edge MTA other than Microsoft Exchange support the client-side
> of ATRN?
No idea. I'd say ATRN is a dead subject besides being used by some exchange
users and being offered by some ISPs (europe mostly, not sure why).
>
> Are there enough ATRN-dependent Exchange shops with part-time o
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 1:37 PM, mouss wrote:
> unlist an address after some bounces. for this, you will probably need
> VERP (if the bounce is received from a remote system, it is hard to find
> out the recipient, because of "remote" aliases, forwarding, ...).
Ah, OK, as mentioned in my initial
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 12:54:25PM -0600, adrian ilarion ciobanu wrote:
> > Using login names as next-hop destination? I am not sure I like
> > this user interface.
>
> well the next hop in the case of atrn IS the connection authenticated
> for the user more than anythin else. i believe there's n
Alan McKay a écrit :
>> Postfix will log all rejections AND BOUNCE permanent errors or queue
>> expiration ($maximal_queue_lifetime) mails. You also need some means
>> of handling the bounces.
>
> Could you elaborate on "some means of handling the bounces"?
unlist an address after some bounces. f
* JORGE CARMINATI :
> Hi! I just want to know if the authors of this book are planning to release
> an updated revision with erratas fixes, etc and when (if applies). Thanks
> in advance.
Good news: We are in the middle of it. There will be new chapters, fixes for
errors etc. Todays count: 10 cha
> Victor Duchovni:
> > On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 08:26:15PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> >
> > > Then the transport map would look like:
> > >
> > > example.com atrn:[example.com]
> > > example.org atrn:[example.org]
> >
> > ATRN supports multi-domain requests either explicitly or imp
Jeff Weinberger:
> I changed main.cf so the only "relay_domains" entry is:
>
> relay_domains=lists.mylistserver.com
You need to verify this with the command
postconf -n
It's no good posting unverified cut-and-paste to the mailing list.
Wietse
--- In postfix-us...@yahoogroups.com, Wietse Venema wrote: > >
Jeff Weinberger: > > > > > > Jeff Weinberger: > > > [ Charset UTF-8
unsupported, converting... ] > > > > --- In postfix-us...@yahoogroups.com,
mouss wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Jeff Weinberger a ?crit : > > > >
> > I am hoping that thi
Hi! I just want to know if the authors of this book are planning to release an
updated revision with erratas fixes, etc and when (if applies).
Thanks in advance.
Jorge.
"Cuidar la naturaleza es vivir mejor... hag?moslo juntos. Imprime s?lo lo
necesario."
"L
Otto Hirr:
> In answer to my question, and so others don't have to
> trudge thru the source to find it...
>
> The 'parameter name' may be and non-space, non-equals (i.e. =)
> string of characters.
The fine details are not documented, because I didn't want to promise
that Postfix will forever supp
> Postfix will log all rejections AND BOUNCE permanent errors or queue
> expiration ($maximal_queue_lifetime) mails. You also need some means
> of handling the bounces.
Could you elaborate on "some means of handling the bounces"?
A more directed question I have in that area is this. If I try to
s
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 09:21:16AM -0500, Alan McKay wrote:
> Does this sound right so far? No MX record for this guy?
The MX is for receiving mail for a domain. You're only receiving mail
from the list, to relay out, no mailboxes. This is similar in spirit
to the null client example:
http://www.
In answer to my question, and so others don't have to
trudge thru the source to find it...
The 'parameter name' may be and non-space, non-equals (i.e. =)
string of characters.
For those who may be curious... one can start with something
like postconf.c leading to:
cfg_parser_alloc() in ./src/glob
* Eero Volotinen :
> Hi,
>
> One problem: how to force postfix to deliver one outgoing host via
> other smtp relay? /etc/postfix/transport ?
Yes. man 5 transport
> smtp server is delivering all mails directly via smtp without
> smarthost.
>
> --
> Eero
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich I
Hi,
One problem: how to force postfix to deliver one outgoing host via
other smtp relay? /etc/postfix/transport ? smtp server is delivering
all mails directly via smtp without smarthost.
--
Eero
Vegard Svanberg:
> Hi list,
>
> I'm receiving several thousand errors per day from Postfix. The error is
> "454 4.7.0 TLS not available due to local problem" (see below).
Look in your LOGFILE.
Postfix does not reveal the details of this problem to the SMTP client.
http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG
Hey folks,
At work we offer a subscription service and nightly send out 10s of
thousands of emails to paying customers. At present this is does via
a Kerio mail server which also doubles as our corporate mail server.
I'm in the process of setting up a Postfix box that will eventually
offload the
2010/1/27 Vegard Svanberg :
> * Eero Volotinen [2010-01-27 14:41]:
>
>> Look at logs. "Out: 450 4.1.8 : Sender address
>> rejected: Domain not" looks like DNS problem
>
> Unless half of Norway's DNS servers are bad, ne.jp doesn't exist.
>
> :)
>
> --
> Vegard Svanberg [*tak...@irc (EFnet)]
to d
* Eero Volotinen [2010-01-27 14:41]:
> Look at logs. "Out: 450 4.1.8 : Sender address
> rejected: Domain not" looks like DNS problem
Unless half of Norway's DNS servers are bad, ne.jp doesn't exist.
:)
--
Vegard Svanberg [*tak...@irc (EFnet)]
>> Any ideas? Thanks in advance.
>
> Look at logs. "Out: 450 4.1.8 : Sender address
> rejected: Domain not" looks like DNS problem
>
Not also that you can tune postfix log level to debug out this kind of problem.
--
Eero
2010/1/27 Vegard Svanberg :
> Hi list,
>
> I'm receiving several thousand errors per day from Postfix. The error is
> "454 4.7.0 TLS not available due to local problem" (see below).
>
> TLS is working, and has been for a long time. I've verified this by
> telnet and running STARTTLS. But it seems t
Hi list,
I'm receiving several thousand errors per day from Postfix. The error is
"454 4.7.0 TLS not available due to local problem" (see below).
TLS is working, and has been for a long time. I've verified this by
telnet and running STARTTLS. But it seems to stop working from time to
time, and I
Jeff Weinberger:
> >
> > Jeff Weinberger:
> > [ Charset UTF-8 unsupported, converting... ]
> > > --- In postfix-us...@yahoogroups.com, mouss wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Jeff Weinberger a ?crit :
> > > > > I am hoping that this is something fairly simple that I am
> missing
> > > > >
> > > > > I hav
Victor Duchovni:
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 08:26:15PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> > Then the transport map would look like:
> >
> > example.com atrn:[example.com]
> > example.org atrn:[example.org]
>
> ATRN supports multi-domain requests either explicitly or implicitly,
> in
49 matches
Mail list logo
