Hi guys
Im a newbie using postfix and Im having problems with a domain. Im
having no more than 100 accounts subscribed using ldap + postfix, and
sometimes when users goes to send a message this arrives how a bad
subdomain, and always the same. User with domain u...@mydomain.com
arrives to other
Hi,
A colleague of mine gets a lot of weird Delivery Status Notifications,
Failure Notice and Rejected messages. Yesterday she got 200 of them..
They all come from different servers and they are most from Russia and
Japan and they are countries that we have no connection to at all.
I've
Zitat von Patric Falinder patric.falin...@omg.nu:
Hi,
A colleague of mine gets a lot of weird Delivery Status
Notifications, Failure Notice and Rejected messages. Yesterday she
got 200 of them..
They all come from different servers and they are most from Russia
and Japan and they are
Hello!
I manage a mixed mail system (postfix, sendmail, etc).
The mail routing works with internal email addressing.
I don't want to communicate local/internal addresses with the world.
I search about that, and i found body_check REPLACE solutions to hide
internal address(IP,email), but the
Gary Smith put forth on 11/23/2010 11:47 PM:
My general advice WRT to VPS/colo/hosting outfits such as Softlayer,
Limestone, Sharktech, Hostnoc, Colocation America, Colo4, SingleHop,
Liquid Web, ServePath, GigeNet, WholeSale Internet, FDCservers,
CarolinaNet, Hurricane Electric, et al is to
lst_ho...@kwsoft.de skrev 2010-11-24 10:22:
Zitat von Patric Falinder patric.falin...@omg.nu:
Hi,
A colleague of mine gets a lot of weird Delivery Status Notifications,
Failure Notice and Rejected messages. Yesterday she got 200 of them..
They all come from different servers and they are
Zitat von Patric Falinder patric.falin...@omg.nu:
lst_ho...@kwsoft.de skrev 2010-11-24 10:22:
Zitat von Patric Falinder patric.falin...@omg.nu:
Hi,
A colleague of mine gets a lot of weird Delivery Status Notifications,
Failure Notice and Rejected messages. Yesterday she got 200 of them..
Zitat von deconya elmailperso...@gmail.com:
Hi guys
Im a newbie using postfix and Im having problems with a domain. Im
having no more than 100 accounts subscribed using ldap + postfix, and
sometimes when users goes to send a message this arrives how a bad
subdomain, and always the same. User
Hi,
I want to put throttling in postfix.
Throttling can be of two types :
1. Domain wise throttling (i.e. postfix should sent only 10 mails to
gmail.com and 20 to yahoo.com at a time)
2. On hour basis throttling (i.e. postfix should sent only 1 emails in 1
hour)
Is it possible to have such
Avinash Pawar // Viva put forth on 11/24/2010 4:48 AM:
Hi,
I want to put throttling in postfix.
Throttling can be of two types :
1. Domain wise throttling (i.e. postfix should sent only 10 mails to
gmail.com and 20 to yahoo.com at a time)
2. On hour basis throttling (i.e. postfix
Stan Hoeppner:
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
Wietse Venema put forth on 11/23/2010 6:57 PM:
Victor Duchovni:
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 07:35:49PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
Victor Duchovni:
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 05:20:11PM -0600, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Would you
Wietse Venema put forth on 11/24/2010 6:18 AM:
That's 0.5 seconds to read the table once, and milliseconds to query it.
Is it? I must be misreading this then. But it sure looks like each
query is taking over half a second.
Table has 67669 CIDRs:
[r...@greer]/etc/postfix/cidr_files$ time
Stan Hoeppner:
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
Wietse Venema put forth on 11/24/2010 6:18 AM:
That's 0.5 seconds to read the table once, and milliseconds to query it.
Is it? I must be misreading this then. But it sure looks like each
query is taking over half a second.
On 11/24/2010 7:17 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Avinash Pawar // Viva put forth on 11/24/2010 4:48 AM:
Hi,
I want to put throttling in postfix.
Throttling can be of two types :
1. Domain wise throttling (i.e. postfix should sent only 10 mails to
gmail.com and 20 to yahoo.com at a time)
2. On
lst_ho...@kwsoft.de skrev 2010-11-24 11:08:
Zitat von Patric Falinder patric.falin...@omg.nu:
lst_ho...@kwsoft.de skrev 2010-11-24 10:22:
Zitat von Patric Falinder patric.falin...@omg.nu:
Hi,
A colleague of mine gets a lot of weird Delivery Status Notifications,
Failure Notice and
Hello,
This is, again, for mail server 101.
It seems my postfix/dovecot server on ubuntu 10.10 is working well. However, I
notice that mail sent to 'mail@' is loaded with spam.
Is it possible to disable the 'mail' user, or reject mail sent to m...@? What
should I do?
Thank you, in advance,
On 2010-11-24 Patric Falinder wrote:
lst_ho...@kwsoft.de skrev 2010-11-24 11:08:
Be sure to limit the usage of the list to the affected account and maybe
even to bounce sender addresses as a lot of legitim hosts are listed.
See http://www.backscatterer.org/?target=usage
Ok, thanks! Is there
On 2010-11-24 Bruce Perryman wrote:
It seems my postfix/dovecot server on ubuntu 10.10 is working well.
However, I notice that mail sent to 'mail@' is loaded with spam.
Is it possible to disable the 'mail' user, or reject mail sent to
m...@? What should I do?
You can set
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 08:53:45AM -0800, Bruce Perryman wrote:
Hello,
This is, again, for mail server 101.
It seems my postfix/dovecot server on ubuntu 10.10 is working well. However,
I notice that mail sent to 'mail@' is loaded with spam.
Is it possible to disable the 'mail' user,
Hello,
for setting up some mailing lists I don't want to list the users mail
addresses directly in the group (as in the LDAP-Howto #1), nor would I
like to use the dn (as in Example #2).
We use a uidNumber as user attribute that never changes (except if it is
deleted), so it would be
Hello,
I'm running postfix (version 2.5.5, from debian lenny package) with
amavis and spamassassin for spam checks.
For amavis and SA to work, we have 2 postfix instances, the main one
running in port 25 and other running in other port 2500 that receive
mails from amavis.
In the first
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 06:31:18PM +0100, Neven Luetic wrote:
for setting up some mailing lists I don't want to list the users mail
addresses directly in the group (as in the LDAP-Howto #1), nor would I like
to use the dn (as in Example #2).
If you don't want to do it the right way, you get
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 06:35:19PM +0100, Angel L. Mateo wrote:
Hello,
I'm running postfix (version 2.5.5, from debian lenny package) with
amavis
and spamassassin for spam checks.
For amavis and SA to work, we have 2 postfix instances, the main one
running in port 25 and
for setting up some mailing lists I don't want to list the users mail
addresses directly in the group (as in the LDAP-Howto #1), nor would I like
to use the dn (as in Example #2).
If you don't want to do it the right way, you get to do it the hard way,
whatever that is.
amazing ...
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 07:44:57PM +0100, Neven Luetic wrote:
for setting up some mailing lists I don't want to list the users mail
addresses directly in the group (as in the LDAP-Howto #1), nor would I
like
to use the dn (as in Example #2).
If you don't want to do it the right way, you
Wietse Venema put forth on 11/24/2010 7:20 AM:
Stan Hoeppner:
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
Wietse Venema put forth on 11/24/2010 6:18 AM:
That's 0.5 seconds to read the table once, and milliseconds to query it.
Is it? I must be misreading this then. But it sure looks
Stan Hoeppner:
Wietse Venema put forth on 11/24/2010 6:18 AM:
That's 0.5 seconds to read the table once, and milliseconds to query it.
Is it? I must be misreading this then. But it sure looks like each
query is taking over half a second.
Table has 67669 CIDRs:
Some text was lost ruring cut-and-paste. I have added it below.
Wietse
Stan Hoeppner:
Wietse Venema put forth on 11/24/2010 6:18 AM:
That's 0.5 seconds to read the table once, and milliseconds to query it.
Is it? I must be misreading this then. But it sure looks like each
On Nov 24, 2010, at 1:50 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
You'd be better off with SliceHost (RackSpace) than HE, and SliceHost
sucks from a delivery standpoint.
Hmm... Interesting. Delivery as in transactional or bulk? I only had one or
two slices from them, and off the bat had decent reputation
Wietse Venema put forth on 11/24/2010 1:35 PM:
Stan Hoeppner:
Wietse Venema put forth on 11/24/2010 6:18 AM:
That's 0.5 seconds to read the table once, and milliseconds to query it.
Is it? I must be misreading this then. But it sure looks like each
query is taking over half a second.
Brian Evans - Postfix List put forth on 11/24/2010 7:54 AM:
On 11/24/2010 7:17 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
-o transport_destination_rate_delay = 16s
It's worth noting that transport_destination_rate_delay is implemented
in qmgr and not the smtp client.
Therefore, specifying -o is worthless in
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 02:06:52PM -0600, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Thank you for the detailed explanation Wietse. Given the low mail
volume of this MX (2000 connections/day) would increasing max_idle from
100s to something like 5m or 10m be sane, to keep proxymap alive longer,
Yes, that may be
Stan Hoeppner:
Thank you for the detailed explanation Wietse. Given the low mail
volume of this MX (2000 connections/day) would increasing max_idle from
100s to something like 5m or 10m be sane, to keep proxymap alive longer,
thus decreasing the frequency of table parsing, and thus total time
On 11/24/2010 3:22 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Brian Evans - Postfix List put forth on 11/24/2010 7:54 AM:
On 11/24/2010 7:17 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
-o transport_destination_rate_delay = 16s
It's worth noting that transport_destination_rate_delay is implemented
in qmgr and not the smtp client.
On 11/24/2010 3:35 PM, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
No.. it's [transport-name]_destination_rate_delay. slowdown is the
transport in this example.
This allows processes such as qmgr to control things per transport (a
feature of Postfix 2.5+)
Please ignore the feature of Postfix 2.5 for the
Will Fong put forth on 11/24/2010 1:51 PM:
On Nov 24, 2010, at 1:50 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
You'd be better off with SliceHost (RackSpace) than HE, and SliceHost
sucks from a delivery standpoint.
Hmm... Interesting. Delivery as in transactional or bulk? I only had one or
two slices
Brian Evans - Postfix List:
On 11/24/2010 3:35 PM, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
No.. it's [transport-name]_destination_rate_delay. slowdown is the
transport in this example.
This allows processes such as qmgr to control things per transport (a
feature of Postfix 2.5+)
Please
Wietse Venema put forth on 11/24/2010 2:26 PM:
My objection was to your suggestion that a single postmap command
is representative of Postfix performance. Given that there is easily
a factor 100 difference in compile time versus query time, a single
postmap command is typical only for
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 10:18 PM, zhong ming wu mr.z.m...@gmail.com wrote:
On this list you will be asked for output of postconf -n and not
what you think is relevant.
Fair enough. I am going to try some things and if I am still having
problems, will submit my full configuration to the list.
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 05:33:31PM -0500, chris guirl wrote:
You also don't specify whether your server is an MSA only, or also an
MX host.
It appears the problem is more complicated than I previously thought.
I think I am misunderstanding the intent of some of these security
measures.
On 11/24/2010 06:35 PM, Angel L. Mateo wrote:
Hello,
I'm running postfix (version 2.5.5, from debian lenny package)
with amavis and spamassassin for spam checks.
For amavis and SA to work, we have 2 postfix instances, the main
one running in port 25 and other running in other port
On 11/24/2010 10:38 AM, Laszlo Kupor wrote:
Hello!
I manage a mixed mail system (postfix, sendmail, etc).
Meaning ?
You shouldn't run multiple MTAs on the same system.
The mail routing works with internal email addressing.
That's quite normal.
I don't want to communicate
G'day,
I've been investigating an issue with using Sender Address Verification
using address_verify_sender.
I've established that there is a problem with the implementation of
pipelining used by Microsoft's servers, here's an example of the broken
behaviour:
# telnet 65.55.88.22 25
Trying
43 matches
Mail list logo
