On 23/5/2011 8:55 πμ, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
Can someone please provide some insight to the problem and suggest a
solution?
With some googling I found this rather old message:
http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/postfix/2004-03/2663.html where
Wietse suggested to increase the
Am 23.05.2011 06:47, schrieb Frank Bonnet:
Hello
Anyone could tell me which Linux distro have the most
recent stable Postfix available as a package ?
this question is nonsense because it depends on random
when was the last releease of the distribution and what
major-version was out in the
Am 23.05.2011 08:54, schrieb Reindl Harald:
Am 23.05.2011 06:47, schrieb Frank Bonnet:
Hello
Anyone could tell me which Linux distro have the most
recent stable Postfix available as a package ?
this question is nonsense because it depends on random
when was the last releease of the
On 05/23/2011 08:54 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 23.05.2011 06:47, schrieb Frank Bonnet:
Hello
Anyone could tell me which Linux distro have the most
recent stable Postfix available as a package ?
this question is nonsense because it depends on random
when was the last releease of the
On 05/23/2011 03:35 AM, Jeffs wrote:
Hello All,
Assume the following setup:
Client from xyz.com logins to Many_Companies.com, accesses their email
campaign software running on Many_Companies.com and sends out
newsletters.
A short time later a client from def.com logins to
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 9:10 AM, Frank Bonnet f.bon...@esiee.fr wrote:
OK OK I am not a Linux specialist most of my servers
are running FreeBSD , but I have to build a Linux server
for a friend ( who is not a UNIX specialist ).
So I posted in that list which count many Linux specialists ;-)
On 05/23/2011 12:32 PM, Robert Schetterer wrote:
agree, however
somebody can search by it own here
http://distrowatch.com/search.php
taking it one step further :
http://distrowatch.com/search.php?pkg=postfixpkgver=2.8.3#pkgsearch
shows :
Arch Linux: current
Ark Linux: dockyard
Debian
Am 23.05.2011 10:25, schrieb Mihira Fernando:
On 05/23/2011 12:32 PM, Robert Schetterer wrote:
agree, however
somebody can search by it own here
http://distrowatch.com/search.php
taking it one step further :
http://distrowatch.com/search.php?pkg=postfixpkgver=2.8.3#pkgsearch
shows :
Le lundi 23 mai 2011 à 09:02 +0200, Robert Schetterer a écrit :
Am 23.05.2011 08:54, schrieb Reindl Harald:
Am 23.05.2011 06:47, schrieb Frank Bonnet:
Hello
Anyone could tell me which Linux distro have the most
recent stable Postfix available as a package ?
this question is
On 05/23/2011 10:50 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 23.05.2011 10:25, schrieb Mihira Fernando:
On 05/23/2011 12:32 PM, Robert Schetterer wrote:
agree, however
somebody can search by it own here
http://distrowatch.com/search.php
taking it one step further :
On Sun, 22 May 2011 22:00:49 -0500, Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org
wrote:
Is postfix also the client? What are the settings on that
machine?
Client machines use Claws Mail as MUA (configured to use SMTP at 587)
and those machine have Postfix as the MTA, configured like this:
$ sudo
On 5/23/2011 2:10 AM, Frank Bonnet wrote:
OK OK I am not a Linux specialist most of my servers
are running FreeBSD , but I have to build a Linux server
for a friend ( who is not a UNIX specialist ).
So I posted in that list which count many Linux specialists ;-)
Selecting an operating system
Mark Alan:
In any case setting 'smtpd_tls_mandatory_exclude_ciphers = AES128, DES,
MD5, aNULL' should not interfere with postfix ability to choose from
the strongest to the weakest of the remaining ciphers (as shown by
openssl ciphers -v 'ALL:@STRENGTH')
Is it a postfix bug? If so, I
From: Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com
On 5/23/2011 2:10 AM, Frank Bonnet wrote:
OK OK I am not a Linux specialist most of my servers
are running FreeBSD , but I have to build a Linux server
for a friend ( who is not a UNIX specialist ).
So I posted in that list which count many
On Sun, 22 May 2011 22:32:25 -0700
Rich Wales ri...@richw.org articulated:
Tell the postmaster at the receiving end that they are blocking
legitimate mail thanks to overly aggressive (ie. brain dead)
settings from Barracuda. It should not matter at all the IP
address of the person
On Sun, 22 May 2011 19:50:33 -0700
Des Dougan d...@douganconsulting.com articulated:
Thanks, Sahil. What's the best way of doing that?
Please don't top post.
You might want to start here:
http://www.postfix.com/VIRTUAL_README.html. That should supply you
with enough basic knowledge to get
Mark Alan:
This issue is not present without postscreen. Could it be related to it or
- with the tlsproxy service?
Perhaps surprisingly, both smtpd and tlsproxy specify the same
parameters to OPENSSL (*). If you tweek them, then you may see
differences.
Wietse
(*) I can't imagine why I
Hi all,
I have a mail server which has been running for more than 1 year without
any problem. recently (from last Sat. exactly) some user from our
website reports that he can't get his subscription email. So I checked
the server, and find that the active queue is full, with more than 280M
Am 23.05.2011 14:39, schrieb yaoxing:
May 23 07:27:36 gw1 postfix/local[7700]: fatal: main.cf configuration error:
mailbox_size_limit is smaller than
message_size_limit
So please give us postconf -n or check your configuration
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi Reindl
I can't get that now. I'll post that later. But this does seem to be
the key issue, as the server has been running for more than one year
without any problem. And I haven't change anything for a long time.
What do u think?
Sent from my iPad
在 2011-5-23，21:00，Reindl Harald
Hello 张耀星,
Monday, May 23, 2011, 8:26:09 AM, you wrote:
Hi Reindl
I can't get that now. I'll post that later. But this does seem to be
the key issue, as the server has been running for more than one year
without any problem. And I haven't change anything for a long time.
What do u think?
if there are errors they have to be cleaned all
because has been running for more than a year
is no argument since this would mean you have
no problem - but you have :-)
Am 23.05.2011 15:26, schrieb 张耀星:
Hi Reindl
I can't get that now. I'll post that later. But this does seem to be
the key
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 09:26:09PM +0800, 张耀星 wrote:
Please don't top-post.
Am 23.05.2011 14:39, schrieb yaoxing:
May 23 07:27:36 gw1 postfix/local[7700]: fatal: main.cf configuration
error: mailbox_size_limit is smaller than
message_size_limit
And I haven't change
On 5/23/2011 3:33 AM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 05/23/2011 03:35 AM, Jeffs wrote:
Hello All,
Assume the following setup:
Client from xyz.com logins to Many_Companies.com, accesses their
email campaign software running on Many_Companies.com and sends out
newsletters.
A short time later a
Hi
I have same situation like this
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/postfix-users/message/273685
All I want to do is to completly separate all mail services. Now the mx
service run on a different instance/s, pop/imap services also (using
perdition).
I still have problems with submission
Dear All Postfix users who replied.
Thanks all for your support. I got the mail admin at the otherend to
white list the IP range in question. I do believe its a silly way of
blocking e-mail!
On 5/23/2011 4:49 PM, Jerry wrote:
On Sun, 22 May 2011 22:32:25 -0700
Rich Walesri...@richw.org
Le 23/05/2011 05:11, Troy Piggins a écrit :
* Mark Homoky wrote :
* Monday, May 23, 2011, 12:25:40 AM, you wrote:
I've recently been keeping an eye on my mail statistics
usingmailgraph http://mailgraph.schweikert.ch/ . I'm impressed by
the amount of spam/rejections achieved using just
On 5/23/2011 9:30 AM, Jeffs wrote:
On 5/23/2011 3:33 AM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 05/23/2011 03:35 AM, Jeffs wrote:
Hello All,
Assume the following setup:
Client from xyz.com logins to Many_Companies.com, accesses
their email campaign software running on Many_Companies.com
and sends out
Le 23/05/2011 04:50, Des Dougan a écrit :
Thanks, Sahil. What's the best way of doing that?
go step by step: add a domain in mysql, add users in mysql, ... then
tell postfix to use these (virtual_mailbox_domains,
virtual_mailbox_maps, ...) then test.
#cat main.cf
...
On 5/23/2011 11:06 AM, Noel Jones wrote:
On 5/23/2011 9:30 AM, Jeffs wrote:
On 5/23/2011 3:33 AM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 05/23/2011 03:35 AM, Jeffs wrote:
Hello All,
Assume the following setup:
Client from xyz.com logins to Many_Companies.com, accesses
their email campaign software
I fixed the issue you mentioned above. Now it seems all the stuck mails
had went to the deferred queue, and the active queue is clear again.
This is interesting. I checked some mail in the deferred queue. Most of
them seems to be Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender. It seems
someones sent mails
On 5/23/2011 10:19 AM, Jeffs wrote:
On 5/23/2011 11:06 AM, Noel Jones wrote:
The Received: header is added by the receiving system, not
by your server, and always shows the IP of the connection.
If you want each client to have their own identity, each
client will need its own IP. You can't
Hi, Neil,
My confusion lies in the fact that the email client campaign software is
actually initiating a connection to the virtual domain, and sending the
mail to it -- all on the same server, mind you -- then IT sends it out
through the interface with it's virtualized IP address.
I don't
On 5/23/2011 10:59 AM, yaoxing wrote:
I fixed the issue you mentioned above. Now it seems all the
stuck mails had went to the deferred queue, and the active
queue is clear again.
This is interesting. I checked some mail in the deferred
queue. Most of them seems to be Undelivered Mail Returned to
On May 2011, at 4:24 AM, Jerry wrote:
On Sun, 22 May 2011 19:50:33 -0700
Des Dougan d...@douganconsulting.com articulated:
Thanks, Sahil. What's the best way of doing that?
Please don't top post.
You might want to start here:
http://www.postfix.com/VIRTUAL_README.html. That should
Le 23/05/2011 19:01, Des Dougan a écrit :
On May 2011, at 4:24 AM, Jerry wrote:
On Sun, 22 May 2011 19:50:33 -0700
Des Dougan d...@douganconsulting.com articulated:
Thanks, Sahil. What's the best way of doing that?
Please don't top post.
You might want to start here:
I've just come across the article Successful timing attacks on elliptic curve
cryptography
http://www.h-online.com/security/news/item/Successful-timing-attacks-on-elliptic-curve-cryptography-1247772.html
and I am trying to figure out if the problem described affects Postfix and
what I would need
* Patrick Ben Koetter p...@state-of-mind.de:
I've just come across the article Successful timing attacks on elliptic curve
cryptography
http://www.h-online.com/security/news/item/Successful-timing-attacks-on-elliptic-curve-cryptography-1247772.html
and I am trying to figure out if the problem
It's a terrible way to block spam. It's a GREAT way to block email. Huge
difference there... ;)
Jim
On May 23, 2011, at 9:42 AM, Janantha Marasinghe wrote:
Dear All Postfix users who replied.
Thanks all for your support. I got the mail admin at the otherend to white
list the IP range
RFC 2822 says that originator header fields with the full name (of person who
sent the message) in parentheses after address without angle brakets is legacy
form. And postfix's sendmail sends message from user with the fullname in
parentheses, but Sendmail (Sendmail Consortium) sends message
40 matches
Mail list logo
