Re: Sending Bulk Mails

2011-06-05 Thread Frank Bonnet
Le 04/06/2011 23:37, mouss a écrit : Le 04/06/2011 07:09, Frank Bonnet a écrit : Hello 1 - configure your DNS SPF record personal opinion: I recommend against: my experience with hotmail is as follows: - I've added an spf record. cool it works - i had to move the server to another IP. I

Re: Sending Bulk Mails

2011-06-05 Thread Stan Hoeppner
On 6/4/2011 6:25 AM, /dev/rob0 wrote: My recommendation to the OP is to consider outsourcing this. It will not cost that much, and a reputable email service provider can be well worth what they charge. Conversely to do it inhouse I would recommend tearing it all down and starting over

Re: Sending Bulk Mails

2011-06-05 Thread Jerry
On Sun, 05 Jun 2011 05:52:53 -0500 Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com articulated: On 6/4/2011 6:25 AM, /dev/rob0 wrote: My recommendation to the OP is to consider outsourcing this. It will not cost that much, and a reputable email service provider can be well worth what they charge.

Re: Sending Bulk Mails

2011-06-05 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 05.06.2011 14:30, schrieb Jerry: On Sun, 05 Jun 2011 05:52:53 -0500 Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com articulated: +1 Outsource the sending of these shareholder notifications to a reputable bulk mailer. Stating you are running an EOL OS and EOL Postfix tells us you are not up to

Re: postscreen MX Policy test and multiple listening IP addresses

2011-06-05 Thread Wietse Venema
/dev/rob0: On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 01:09:28PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote: postscreen_whitelist_interfaces matters only for clients that are not yet whitelisted (or that have expired). Issue: previously whitelisted client gets WHITELIST VETO on secondary Of course, being whitelisted once

Re: Sending Bulk Mails

2011-06-05 Thread Wietse Venema
Stan Hoeppner: On 6/4/2011 6:25 AM, /dev/rob0 wrote: My recommendation to the OP is to consider outsourcing this. It will not cost that much, and a reputable email service provider can be well worth what they charge. Conversely to do it inhouse I would recommend tearing it all down

Re: postscreen MX Policy test and multiple listening IP addresses

2011-06-05 Thread /dev/rob0
On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 09:21:21AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote: /dev/rob0: On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 01:09:28PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote: postscreen_whitelist_interfaces matters only for clients that are not yet whitelisted (or that have expired). Issue: previously whitelisted client

Re: Sending Bulk Mails

2011-06-05 Thread Stan Hoeppner
On 6/5/2011 8:36 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: Stan Hoeppner: On 6/4/2011 6:25 AM, /dev/rob0 wrote: My recommendation to the OP is to consider outsourcing this. It will not cost that much, and a reputable email service provider can be well worth what they charge. Conversely to do it inhouse I

Re: postscreen MX Policy test and multiple listening IP addresses

2011-06-05 Thread Wietse Venema
/dev/rob0: Jun 5 01:50:46 cardinal postfix/postscreen[15628]: CONNECT from [174.37.3.121]:33695 to [216.23.247.74]:25 Jun 5 01:50:52 cardinal postfix/postscreen[15628]: PASS OLD [174.37.3.121]:33695 Jun 5 01:50:52 cardinal postfix/smtpd[15816]: connect from

Re: postscreen MX Policy test and multiple listening IP addresses

2011-06-05 Thread kshitij mali
Hello all, Since till now i was using postfix 2.5 i am planning to upgrade to 2.8 because i see 2 major feature multi -instance and postscreen can any one give me with example of an ideal conguration . Regards, Kshitij On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 7:51 PM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:

Postfix/Sendmail and Apache James

2011-06-05 Thread Marc Chamberlin
Hello - I am a new subscriber to this mail list and am in need of some help configuring Postfix/Sendmail to work with the Apache James email server. Don't get me wrong on this, Postfix is probably a fine MTA, but I have some complex mailets designed which run under Apache James. ;-) Anywise, in

Re: postscreen MX Policy test and multiple listening IP addresses

2011-06-05 Thread Jeroen Geilman
On 06/05/2011 04:54 PM, kshitij mali wrote: Hello all, HI! Please: 1. DO NOT Top-post, 2. Reply to the LIST, and 3. DO NOT hijack threads for your own issues. Thanks! -- J.

Re: Postfix/Sendmail and Apache James

2011-06-05 Thread Wietse Venema
Marc Chamberlin: Hello - I am a new subscriber to this mail list and am in need of some help configuring Postfix/Sendmail to work with the Apache James email server. Don't get me wrong on this, Postfix is probably a fine MTA, but I have some complex mailets designed which run under Apache

Re: fatal: lock file defer error

2011-06-05 Thread Nikolaos Milas
On 23/5/2011 9:26 πμ, Nikolaos Milas wrote: With some googling I found this rather old message: http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/postfix/2004-03/2663.html where Wietse suggested to increase the var_flock_tries undocumented parameter in main.cf (from 20 to 40). Would this suggestion be

Re: fatal: lock file defer error

2011-06-05 Thread Wietse Venema
Nikolaos Milas: On 23/5/2011 9:26 ??, Nikolaos Milas wrote: With some googling I found this rather old message: http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/postfix/2004-03/2663.html where Wietse suggested to increase the var_flock_tries undocumented parameter in main.cf (from 20 to 40).

Re: Postfix/Sendmail and Apache James

2011-06-05 Thread Marc Chamberlin
On 6/5/2011 9:36 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: Marc Chamberlin: Hello - I am a new subscriber to this mail list and am in need of some help configuring Postfix/Sendmail to work with the Apache James email server. Don't get me wrong on this, Postfix is probably a fine MTA, but I have some complex

Re: Postfix/Sendmail and Apache James

2011-06-05 Thread Jeroen Geilman
On 06/06/2011 01:02 AM, Marc Chamberlin wrote: Thanks Wietse for replying! From your reply, I think you are interpreting my question as asking how Apache James can use Postfix/Sendmail to process email for it. Actually, what I need is the other way around, how to configure Postfix/Sendmail to

Re: Postfix/Sendmail and Apache James

2011-06-05 Thread Jeroen Geilman
On 06/06/2011 01:11 AM, Jeroen Geilman wrote: On 06/06/2011 01:02 AM, Marc Chamberlin wrote: Thanks Wietse for replying! From your reply, I think you are interpreting my question as asking how Apache James can use Postfix/Sendmail to process email for it. Actually, what I need is the other

Re: postscreen MX Policy test and multiple listening IP addresses

2011-06-05 Thread /dev/rob0
On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 10:21:38AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote: /dev/rob0: Jun 5 01:50:46 cardinal postfix/postscreen[15628]: CONNECT from [174.37.3.121]:33695 to [216.23.247.74]:25 Jun 5 01:50:52 cardinal postfix/postscreen[15628]: PASS OLD [174.37.3.121]:33695 Jun 5 01:50:52

ideal postscreen config (was: Re: postscreen MX Policy ...)

2011-06-05 Thread /dev/rob0
On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 08:24:40PM +0530, kshitij mali wrote: Since till now i was using postfix 2.5 i am planning to upgrade to 2.8 because i see 2 major feature multi -instance and postscreen can any one give me with example of an ideal conguration . 2.8 is a very good idea. I can highly