In connection with various other problems I shall probably need help
with later, I thought I might re-install Postfix 2.8.3 from ports in
FreeBSD 8.2. As part of the install I get the following messages:
Note: the following files or directories still exist but are
no longer part of
On Sun, 2011-08-07 at 15:15:14 +0200, Bernard T. Higonnet wrote:
In connection with various other problems I shall probably need help
with later, I thought I might re-install Postfix 2.8.3 from ports in
FreeBSD 8.2. As part of the install I get the following messages:
FYI: 2.8.4 is the latest
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 2:10 PM, Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org wrote:
On 8/5/2011 3:26 PM, Jack Bates wrote:
What's the simplest way to enable smtpd_authorized_xforward_hosts for
any/all clients?
That sounds very wrong. What problem are you trying to solve?
I want to control access to
Wow, over 48 hours and no solution(s) suggested? Everybody on
vacation? :)
Regards,
Jim
--
Note: My mail server employs *very* aggressive anti-spam
filtering. If you reply to this email and your email is
rejected, please accept my apologies and let me know via my
web form at
On Sun, 2011-08-07 at 11:08:13 -0400, Jim Seymour wrote:
Wow, over 48 hours and no solution(s) suggested? Everybody on
vacation? :)
It is the weekend! :-)
Without being privy to configuration details (IIRC you only shared a
general description of mail routing), I think transport_maps on
On Sun, Aug 07, 2011 at 08:03:47AM -0700, Jack Bates wrote:
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 2:10 PM, Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org
wrote:
On 8/5/2011 3:26 PM, Jack Bates wrote:
What's the simplest way to enable
smtpd_authorized_xforward_hosts for any/all clients?
That sounds very wrong.
On 2011-08-07 17:08, Jim Seymour wrote:
Wow, over 48 hours and no solution(s) suggested? Everybody on
vacation? :)
Don't hijack another poster's thread.
And yes, it IS the summer vacation.
--
J.
On 8/7/2011 12:36 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
On Sun, Aug 07, 2011 at 08:03:47AM -0700, Jack Bates wrote:
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 2:10 PM, Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org
wrote:
On 8/5/2011 3:26 PM, Jack Bates wrote:
What's the simplest way to enable
smtpd_authorized_xforward_hosts for any/all
On Sun, 07 Aug 2011 20:02:22 +0200
Jeroen Geilman articulated:
On 2011-08-07 17:08, Jim Seymour wrote:
Wow, over 48 hours and no solution(s) suggested? Everybody on
vacation? :)
Don't hijack another poster's thread.
And yes, it IS the summer vacation.
Only if you are north of the
On 8/7/2011 11:02 AM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 2011-08-07 17:08, Jim Seymour wrote:
Wow, over 48 hours and no solution(s) suggested? Everybody on
vacation? :)
Don't hijack another poster's thread.
And yes, it IS the summer vacation.
Sorry, I must have missed something; whose thread was
On Sun, Aug 07, 2011 at 02:10:35PM -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
On 8/7/2011 12:36 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
On Sun, Aug 07, 2011 at 08:03:47AM -0700, Jack Bates wrote:
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 2:10 PM, Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org
wrote:
On 8/5/2011 3:26 PM, Jack Bates wrote:
What's the
On 8/7/2011 3:52 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
On Sun, Aug 07, 2011 at 02:10:35PM -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
# main.cf
smtpd_authorized_xforward_hosts = ip.of.upstream.postfix
Apparently this upstream IP is dynamic, he said in IRC. Agreed, it
sounds very strange.
If the upstream is dynamic, there
On Sun, Aug 07, 2011 at 03:59:10PM -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
On 8/7/2011 3:52 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
On Sun, Aug 07, 2011 at 02:10:35PM -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
# main.cf
smtpd_authorized_xforward_hosts = ip.of.upstream.postfix
Apparently this upstream IP is dynamic, he said in IRC.
I see some previous posts regarding this - just my 2 cents worth. There mig=
ht be multiple triggers for the penalty time, but, one I'd like to see woul=
d be just like postscreen_dnsbl_threshold, perhaps postscreen_dnsbl_penalty=
_threshold. In this way, I might want a score of 3 to trigger
14 matches
Mail list logo
