Re: Best Practice for (not)allowing "spoofed" MAIL FROM addresses

2011-12-22 Thread Richard Damon
On 12/22/11 3:59 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: > On 22.12.2011 04:24, Richard Damon wrote: >> I also have one web hosting provider that basically does NOT provide >> outgoing SMTP service, they specifically state that they expect you to >> be using your ISPs SMTP server to be sending out your email. (Th

getting emails into inbox

2011-12-22 Thread Al Zick
Hi, We have been using the same mail server for a long time with the same IP. It relays the email for several webservers and of course all of our email. Yet, lately (maybe the last month or so) I have been getting a lot of complaints about their emails not being delivered and sending the

Re: postfix devnull mailbox

2011-12-22 Thread Dennis Carr
On Thu, 22 Dec 2011, Sahil Tandon wrote: Because this thread has veered off into a general discussion about mail operation/policy, would you consider taking it off-list or to a more appropriate forum, e.g. the mailop list? Agreed. I'm stunned that a tongue in cheek comment of mine has resulte

Re: postfix devnull mailbox

2011-12-22 Thread Sahil Tandon
On Fri, 2011-12-23 at 12:10:10 +1300, Peter wrote: > On 23/12/11 01:53, Stan Hoeppner wrote: > > On 12/21/2011 5:30 PM, Peter wrote: > >> There is nothing more frustrating than trying to figure out why your > >> emails are not going through to your customers than when they are > >> accepted for de

Re: postfix devnull mailbox

2011-12-22 Thread Peter
On 23/12/11 01:53, Stan Hoeppner wrote: > On 12/21/2011 5:30 PM, Peter wrote: >> There is nothing more frustrating than trying to figure out why your >> emails are not going through to your customers than when they are >> accepted for delivery and *not* delivered. I have very little patience >> fo

Re: problem with dspam

2011-12-22 Thread Andreas Berton
On Thu, 22 Dec 2011, Wietse Venema wrote: Andreas Berton: Problem usually occur when you run dspam from pipe, and my guess is that you do so. Consider switch to daemon mode/lmtp whish in many cases solv the problem, However if need to run from command line you might try this. dspam unix

Re: problem with dspam

2011-12-22 Thread Wietse Venema
Andreas Berton: > Problem usually occur when you run dspam from pipe, and my guess is that > you do so. Consider switch to daemon mode/lmtp whish in many cases solv > the problem, However if need to run from command line you might try this. > > dspam unix - n n - 10

Re: problem with dspam

2011-12-22 Thread Andreas Berton
On Tue, 20 Dec 2011, fakessh @ wrote: hello list hello geek hello guru hello Fu I have done tests on my smtp server used to dspam. after problems of housing road I realized that dspam removes Return-Path header my emails are then intercepted as spam. I have not found a solution to my proble

Re: Loadbalancing+failover solution

2011-12-22 Thread Robert Schetterer
Am 22.12.2011 19:01, schrieb Michael Maymann: > Hi List, > > I would like to setup a stable and reliable mailrelay solution based on > PostFix, that is both redundant and could share the load between 2 > physical servers. > How is this done best...? thoughts/documentation/howtos are very > welcome

Howto forward local mail from all my LDAP-users on all my linuxboxes to their outlook email-accounts

2011-12-22 Thread Michael Maymann
Hi List, I also would like to forward local mail from all my LDAP-users (e.g. maymann) on all my linuxboxes to their outlook email-accounts (e.g michael.maym...@domain.com). Anyone with a working howto for this? Thanks in advance :-) ~Maymann

Loadbalancing+failover solution

2011-12-22 Thread Michael Maymann
Hi List, I would like to setup a stable and reliable mailrelay solution based on PostFix, that is both redundant and could share the load between 2 physical servers. How is this done best...? thoughts/documentation/howtos are very welcome...:-) Thanks in advance :-) ! ~maymann

Re: Body checks and content-types

2011-12-22 Thread Noel Jones
On 12/21/2011 11:32 PM, Alex wrote: > Hi all, > > I have a fedora15 install with postfix-2.8.7, and have a variation of > spam that I'd like to block outright using a body check. I'm trying to > figure out why one of my body checks isn't working. I have the > following in my body_checks.pcre file

Re: transport private/smtp: Connection refused [solved]

2011-12-22 Thread DN Singh
You could also have done that by using, domain.com.brsmtp:pop.domain.com.br On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 1:57 AM, Alfredo Saldanha < asalda...@corp.infolink.com.br> wrote: > Hi, > > I solved this problem! > > I change the transport map: > > from: > domain.com.brsmtp:pop.domain.com

Re: postfix devnull mailbox

2011-12-22 Thread Stan Hoeppner
On 12/21/2011 5:30 PM, Peter wrote: > On 22/12/11 04:56, Stan Hoeppner wrote: >> or discarded. > There is nothing more frustrating than trying to figure out why your > emails are not going through to your customers than when they are > accepted for delivery and *not* delivered. I have very littl

Re: Deviding relay for internal and external mail

2011-12-22 Thread /dev/rob0
On Thursday 22 December 2011 03:39:39 Michael Maymann wrote: > As 99,96% of all our mail is to internal users > (*@internal_mail.com), I would like to relay these directly to our > official mailserver, and still keep relaying external mails > (anything but *@internal_mail.com) to our ISP mailserver

Deviding relay for internal and external mail

2011-12-22 Thread Michael Maymann
Hi List, I have a postfix server currently relaying all mails to our ISP mailsserver. As we had a crash in one of our big services, our ISP mailserver saw this extensivated traffic as spam (due to reputaions based filtering) and blacklisted my postfix relayhost...:-(! I have double-checked that we

Re: Best Practice for (not)allowing "spoofed" MAIL FROM addresses

2011-12-22 Thread Reindl Harald
On 22.12.2011 04:24, Richard Damon wrote: > I also have one web hosting provider that basically does NOT provide > outgoing SMTP service, they specifically state that they expect you to > be using your ISPs SMTP server to be sending out your email. (They do > provide a very throttled outgoing SMTP

Re: Best Practice for (not)allowing "spoofed" MAIL FROM addresses

2011-12-22 Thread Reindl Harald
On 22.12.2011 05:26, John Hinton wrote: > One thing about email. There are NO hard rules beyond the RFCs and even those > are > badly abused on many fronts these days. Exceptions abound! the RFCs where written in times where we had not 13 Mio. Spammails each year filtered out and you have to a