Hi,
I've read (e.g. here:
http://readlist.com/lists/postfix.org/postfix-users/19/99851.html and
elsewhere) that when we want to use proxymap (like: "proxy:ldap:...",
then we need to add in main.cf the output of postconf -d | grep
proxy_read_maps and append any additional parameters.
So in m
Nikolaos Milas:
> So in my case (Postfix 2.8.3):
>
> # postconf -d | grep proxy_read_maps
> proxy_read_maps = $local_recipient_maps $mydestination
> $virtual_alias_maps $virtual_alias_domains $virtual_mailbox_maps
> $virtual_mailbox_domains $relay_recipient_maps $relay_domains
> $canonical_maps
On 9/3/2012 1:03 μμ, Wietse Venema wrote:
There is no proxy: in there. If you use
virtual_alias_maps = proxy:ldap:whatever ...
Then it will automatically be included in the proxy_read_maps
value, and the proxymap dameon will permit lookups.
Thanks Wietse,
Initially, I assumed it would
Nikolaos Milas:
> Mar 8 20:06:56 vmail postfix/proxymap[32375]: fatal: open
> /etc/postfix/ldap-alias-vacation.cf: Permission denied
The ***POSTFIX*** user must be able to open the file.
Wietse
On 9/3/2012 1:33 μμ, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
# ls -la /etc/postfix/ldap-*
-rw-r- 1 root root 774 Oct 26 2010 /etc/postfix/ldap-aliases.cf
-rw-r- 1 root root 358 Aug 24 2010
/etc/postfix/ldap-alias-vacation.cf
-rwxr-x--- 1 root root 495 Aug 24 2010 /etc/postfix/ldap-users.cf
I would lik
Am 09.03.2012 12:44, schrieb Nikolaos Milas:
> On 9/3/2012 1:33 μμ, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
>
>> # ls -la /etc/postfix/ldap-*
>> -rw-r- 1 root root 774 Oct 26 2010 /etc/postfix/ldap-aliases.cf
>> -rw-r- 1 root root 358 Aug 24 2010 /etc/postfix/ldap-alias-vacation.cf
>> -rwxr-x--- 1 root ro
For reference:
# postconf -n
alias_database = hash:/etc/postfix/aliases,
hash:/etc/postfix/aliases.d/virtual_aliases
alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases
broken_sasl_auth_clients = yes
command_directory = /usr/sbin
config_directory = /etc/postfix
daemon_directory = /usr/libexec/postfix
d
Am 09.03.2012 12:49, schrieb Nikolaos Milas:
> For reference:
>
> # postconf -n
>
why are you not doing simply what the error-message suggests?
add it to "proxy_read_maps", see me mail before
Mar 8 20:12:01 vmail postfix/proxymap[32599]: warning: to approve this table
for read-only access,
Nikolaos Milas:
> Mar 8 20:12:01 vmail postfix/proxymap[32599]: warning: request for
> unapproved table: "ldap:/etc/postfix/ldap-alias-vacation.cf"
That is because you screwed up the proxy_read_maps parameter setting.
COMMENT it OUT and THIS ERROR will go away, leaving your INCORRECT
FILE PERMIS
On 9/3/2012 1:49 μμ, Reindl Harald wrote:
644 is a very bad idea -> chown root:postfix, chmod 640
You are totally right Reindl,
I only did it momentarily, just to check the hypothesis that it was a
permissions problem.
Thanks for your feedback.
Nick
On 9/3/2012 1:53 μμ, Wietse Venema wrote:
That is because you screwed up the proxy_read_maps parameter setting.
When I did all tests, I did not set ANY proxy_read_maps values (so it
should have the default values). All the info I sent about settings of
the proxy_read_maps parameter was hypot
Am 09.03.2012 12:53, schrieb Nikolaos Milas:
> On 9/3/2012 1:49 μμ, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>> 644 is a very bad idea -> chown root:postfix, chmod 640
>
> You are totally right Reindl,
> I only did it momentarily, just to check the hypothesis that it was a
> permissions problem
even than it i
On 9/3/2012 2:01 μμ, Reindl Harald wrote:
even than it is still a wrong action
I've:
chown -R root:postfix /etc/postfix/
and chmod 640 to files and 750 to directories
Thanks,
Nick
Am 09.03.2012 12:53, schrieb Wietse Venema:
> Nikolaos Milas:
>> Mar 8 20:12:01 vmail postfix/proxymap[32599]: warning: request for
>> unapproved table: "ldap:/etc/postfix/ldap-alias-vacation.cf"
>
> That is because you screwed up the proxy_read_maps parameter setting.
> COMMENT it OUT and THI
On 9/3/2012 1:52 μμ, Reindl Harald wrote:
why are you not doing simply what the error-message suggests?
add it to "proxy_read_maps", see me mail before
I understand.
The question is why postfix did not use the proxymap service
automatically - as Wietse mentioned - when I simply added "proxy:
>
>
> In that case, it should be safe to have the option in main.cf,
> because LMTP mail delivery uses lmtp_header_checks instead of
> smtp_header_checks.
>
Thanks, Wietse. It worked like a charm.
--
Lars Preben Sørsdahl
lars.preben.no
Hi,
Today somebody (user1, see below) sent a message from outside to our
org. Our gateway server (Cisco Ironport C-160: mailgw.admin.noa.gr)
received the message which had 9 recipients, of which one in an outside
domain, one in the @astro.noa.gr domain and 7 in the @noa.gr domain.
Those last
Hi,
I gave a secondary mx with 2 ipv4 and 2 ipv6 ip's.
I have dns'd one of each protocol for mx and ns
Trying to get postfix to play nice with mx on outbound. hostname,
mynetworks etc all setup right.
I have tried smtp_bind_address(6) but for some reason, although it
uses the correct IP, the rela
Nick Edwards:
> I have tried smtp_bind_address(6) but for some reason, although it
> uses the correct IP, the relays are denied for spf failure on the
> main server, even though they are all permitted in spf RR, ok, evident
So we know that Postfix sends mail with the correct IP address
but you ha
Am 09.03.2012 15:55, schrieb Nikolaos Milas:
> Hi,
>
> Today somebody (user1, see below) sent a message from outside to our org. Our
> gateway server (Cisco Ironport C-160:
> mailgw.admin.noa.gr) received the message which had 9 recipients, of which
> one in an outside domain, one in the
> @as
Am 09.03.2012 16:01, schrieb Nick Edwards:
> Hi,
>
> I gave a secondary mx with 2 ipv4 and 2 ipv6 ip's.
> I have dns'd one of each protocol for mx and ns
> Trying to get postfix to play nice with mx on outbound. hostname,
> mynetworks etc all setup right.
> I have tried smtp_bind_address(6) but
After Noel Jones tips, I check his postfix config and database in MySQL,
and found that his mailing list domain was added, and was empty. Of
course, Postfix is not a member of Merlin´s the Magician family, empty
domain, empty mailboxes, so, get the error slapping you in the face...
Best regard
On 3/10/12, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Nick Edwards:
>> I have tried smtp_bind_address(6) but for some reason, although it
>> uses the correct IP, the relays are denied for spf failure on the
>> main server, even though they are all permitted in spf RR, ok, evident
>
> So we know that Postfix sends m
On 3/10/12, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 09.03.2012 16:01, schrieb Nick Edwards:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I gave a secondary mx with 2 ipv4 and 2 ipv6 ip's.
>> I have dns'd one of each protocol for mx and ns
>> Trying to get postfix to play nice with mx on outbound. hostname,
>> mynetworks etc all setup righ
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 02:19:55AM +1000, Nick Edwards wrote:
>
> Is the smtp bind address correct method? or inet_interfaces?
smtp_bind_address is for sending, inet_interfaces for receiving.
I think you will get better help if you get down to specifics.
Post the relevant IP addresses, the SPF r
Nick Edwards:
> Is the smtp bind address correct method? or inet_interfaces?
Everybody already knows that smtp_bind_address and smtp_bind_address6
set the correct IP address for SENDING mail.
If the RECEIVING server flags an error for the correct IP address,
then THAT is the problem you need to f
Am 09.03.2012 17:23, schrieb Nick Edwards:
> On 3/10/12, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>>
>> Am 09.03.2012 16:01, schrieb Nick Edwards:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I gave a secondary mx with 2 ipv4 and 2 ipv6 ip's.
>>> I have dns'd one of each protocol for mx and ns
>>> Trying to get postfix to play nice with mx
On 9/3/2012 5:16 μμ, Reindl Harald wrote:
i doubt this is not a postfix-message
It can't be from anywhere else (as far as I can tell). We are not
running any filters, anti-spam or anti-virus on this Postfix server.
I haven't seen any errors on the associated ldap server (used for user
look
On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 06:35:58PM +0200, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
> On 9/3/2012 5:16, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> >i doubt this is not a postfix-message
>
> It can't be from anywhere else (as far as I can tell).
You said it was Ironport.
> We are not running any filters, anti-spam or anti-virus on
>
Am 09.03.2012 17:35, schrieb Nikolaos Milas:
> On 9/3/2012 5:16 μμ, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>> i doubt this is not a postfix-message
>
> It can't be from anywhere else (as far as I can tell). We are not running any
> filters,
> anti-spam or anti-virus on this Postfix server.
Mar 9 04:21:36 v
Nikolaos Milas:
> I hope Wietse can provide some more info.
Negative. The mail is rejected by a non-Postfix machine.
Wietse
On 9/3/2012 2:07 μμ, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
I've:
chown -R root:postfix /etc/postfix/
and chmod 640 to files and 750 to directories
Since I did this, I get the error:
Mar 9 21:23:53 vmail postfix/sendmail[1752]: fatal: open
/etc/postfix/main.cf: Permission denied
# ls -la /etc/postfix/m
Am 09.03.2012 20:28, schrieb Nikolaos Milas:
> On 9/3/2012 2:07 μμ, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
>
>> I've:
>>
>> chown -R root:postfix /etc/postfix/
>>
>> and chmod 640 to files and 750 to directories
>
> Since I did this, I get the error:
>
> Mar 9 21:23:53 vmail postfix/sendmail[1752]: fatal: op
On 9/3/2012 9:28 μμ, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
Since I did this, I get the error:
Mar 9 21:23:53 vmail postfix/sendmail[1752]: fatal: open
/etc/postfix/main.cf: Permission denied
...
What do I have to do to get sendmail (i.e. sendmail.postfix) running
correctly?
Note: these errors come fro
On 9/3/2012 9:59 μμ, Reindl Harald wrote:
/etc/postfix -> 755
Thank you! You saved me from a very bad headache.
Obviously this was the main cause. I found that /etc/postfix was 750.
Thanks also for the absolutely valuable details on permissions. I
followed your advice.
I'll now manage to
Am 09.03.2012 21:01, schrieb Nikolaos Milas:
> On 9/3/2012 9:28 μμ, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
>
>> Since I did this, I get the error:
>>
>> Mar 9 21:23:53 vmail postfix/sendmail[1752]: fatal: open
>> /etc/postfix/main.cf: Permission denied
>>
>> ...
>>
>> What do I have to do to get sendmail (i.e.
Am 09.03.2012 21:18, schrieb Nikolaos Milas:
> On 9/3/2012 9:59 μμ, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>> /etc/postfix -> 755
>
> Thank you! You saved me from a very bad headache.
no problem
> Obviously this was the main cause. I found that /etc/postfix was 750.
> Thanks also for the absolutely valuable
Has anyone ever seen this ...when I type mail at the shell prompt, I
get Subject: Subject: like there is two of something running??
/tmp=>id
uid=0(root) gid=0(root)
groups=0(root),1(bin),2(daemon),3(sys),4(adm),6(disk),10(wheel)
/tmp=>mail freddy
Subject: Subject: test
test
.
Cc:
/tmp=>exit
/tmp/
On Fri, 9 Mar 2012, Ctdi Unix wrote:
Has anyone ever seen this ...when I type mail at the shell prompt, I
get Subject: Subject: like there is two of something running??
The shell mail command is not part of Postfix. This problem does not
appear to be related to Postfix in any manner.
-- Lar
Ctdi Unix:
> Has anyone ever seen this ...when I type mail at the shell prompt, I
> get Subject: Subject: like there is two of something running??
>
>
> /tmp=>id
> uid=0(root) gid=0(root)
> groups=0(root),1(bin),2(daemon),3(sys),4(adm),6(disk),10(wheel)
> /tmp=>mail freddy
> Subject: Subject: tes
On 3/10/12, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Nick Edwards:
>> Is the smtp bind address correct method? or inet_interfaces?
>
> Everybody already knows that smtp_bind_address and smtp_bind_address6
> set the correct IP address for SENDING mail.
>
> If the RECEIVING server flags an error for the correct IP ad
Hi list
Probably quite a few of you are running virtual domain hosting
http://www.postfix.org/VIRTUAL_README.html. I have started with similar setup,
but then I merged all tables into one to make management simpler. Unfortunately
there wasn’t any web admin for managing such a set-up so I wrote
I must have mentioned that the demo is running here:
http://postfixadmin.agiletoolkit.org
Have a nice weekend everyone.
> Hi list
>
> Probably quite a few of you are running virtual domain hosting
> http://www.postfix.org/VIRTUAL_README.html. I have started with similar
> setup, but then I me
On 3/10/12, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 09.03.2012 17:23, schrieb Nick Edwards:
>> On 3/10/12, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>
>> logs are no good because it simply says rejected (ip) spf -all method.
>>
>> all other settings wont help either since the two new settings smtp
>> bind address and
i recently upgraded my test-vm to Fedora 16
the following messages appear in the syslog (with Fedora 15 they was not there)
why they are unused and why they are not in /var/log/maillog?
Mar 10 02:16:45 testserver postfix[1935]: /usr/sbin/postconf: warning:
/etc/postfix/main.c
Reindl Harald:
> i recently upgraded my test-vm to Fedora 16
> the following messages appear in the syslog (with Fedora 15 they was not
> there)
> why they are unused
Because they are not used. For example, smtpd_tls_cipherlist
does not exist, and barracuda_smtpd_recipient_restrictions
also does
Am 10.03.2012 02:35, schrieb Wietse Venema:
> Because they are not used. For example, smtpd_tls_cipherlist
> does not exist
ok, got an old documentation i assume
> and barracuda_smtpd_recipient_restrictions
> also does not exist.
was mentioned by you because "permit_mynetworks, reject"
does n
On Sat, 2012-03-10 at 11:08 +1000, Nick Edwards wrote:
> On 3/10/12, Reindl Harald wrote:
> > what type of entries are you using in your SPF record?
> > i found out that a/mx entries sometimes making troubles and since
> > we changed our backend to use only ip and let the backend
> > translate s
Reindl Harald:
> Am 10.03.2012 02:35, schrieb Wietse Venema:
> > Because they are not used. For example, smtpd_tls_cipherlist
> > does not exist
>
> ok, got an old documentation i assume
Nope, then there would be a backwards compatibility feature.
> 10.0.0.15:10026 inet n - n - - s
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
> On 8/3/2012 6:40 πμ, Eero Volotinen wrote:
>
> What is the best / reliable site to find newer postfix rpm packages
>> for centos 5 / rhel 5? by default it ships postfix 2.3.x and it's a
>> bit antique version.
>>
>>
> Hi Eero,
>
> These ar
Le samedi 10 mars 2012 à 09:28 +0530, The_Ace a écrit :
> On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
> On 8/3/2012 6:40 πμ, Eero Volotinen wrote:
>
> What is the best / reliable site to find newer postfix
> rpm packages
>
2012/3/10 ml
> Le samedi 10 mars 2012 à 09:28 +0530, The_Ace a écrit :
> > On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
> > On 8/3/2012 6:40 πμ, Eero Volotinen wrote:
> >
> > What is the best / reliable site to find newer postfix
> > rpm packages
Hi List,
I would like to setup a LoadShared Failover internal mail-relay solution
(only for sending mail internal->external).
My thoughts:
- Setup virtual+physical server in same VLAN (different physical locations)
with same OS+Postfix+config
- Configure DNS RoundRobin
- Have logging from both se
53 matches
Mail list logo
