The Subject: is misleading. The OP wants merely to shorten this
working setting:
> >postconf virtual_transport
> virtual_transport = lmtp:[localhost]:lmtp-deliver
>
> this works fine.
... to something like this:
> out of curiosity, i wondered if the particulars could be
> >
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 11:14:19AM -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
> I believe the virtual(8) delivery agent is the only program that
> uses virtual_transport, so that's the only place in master.cf that
> you could put "-o virtual_transport=...' and expect it to have an
> effect.
In fact it is trivial-r
Yu (Irvin) Fan:
> <*realn...@gmail.com*> (expanded from ): Command died
> with status 100: "filter.pl". Command output: Email contains content that
> is not allowed.
DO NOT accept-then-bounce mail.
Please read up on "backscatter mail" with your favorite search
engine.
Wietse
Let's say I have an alias m...@mydomain.com for the actual email address
realn...@gmail.com. The actual email address is hidden. We don't want to
expose it to anybody. In some cases we want to reject the email sent to
m...@mydomain.com based on content, sender, etc. When that happens our
postfix se
On 19 Mar 2012, at 20:04, "Ansgar Wiechers" wrote:
> On 2012-03-19 Luca Pacor wrote:
>>> On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 11:58:26AM +, Luca Pacor wrote:
Now postfix delivers everything @ that.domain to their mailer, also
for the user I manage locally:
Mar 4 12:24:07 server6 postfi
On 2012-03-19 Luca Pacor wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 11:58:26AM +, Luca Pacor wrote:
>>> Now postfix delivers everything @ that.domain to their mailer, also
>>> for the user I manage locally:
>>>
>>> Mar 4 12:24:07 server6 postfix/trivial-rewrite[7155]: warning:
>>> do not list domain tha
On 2012-03-19 11:01 AM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 09:20:13AM -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
One question/confirmation though (reading
http://www.postfix.org/access.5.html does not seem to answer
this, but I may be missing that too) - does an OK here skip
further checks in the entir
Noel Jones:
> On 3/19/2012 7:36 AM, btb wrote:
>
> > that actually is the real problem i'm trying to solve. right now,
> > i'm using virtual_transport = lmtp:[localhost]:lmtp-deliver, and
> > this works fine. i'm just curious if i can "move" the settings to
> > master.cf. it's just an exercise
On 3/19/2012 7:36 AM, btb wrote:
> that actually is the real problem i'm trying to solve. right now,
> i'm using virtual_transport = lmtp:[localhost]:lmtp-deliver, and
> this works fine. i'm just curious if i can "move" the settings to
> master.cf. it's just an exercise in learning for me. if
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 1:07 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 10:59:51AM +0200, K bharathan wrote:
> > with postscreen i experience the following problem:
> > it blocks mail from hotmal as following (from mail log)
> >
> > Mar 19 10:17:19 relay1 postfix/postscreen[10619]: NOQUEUE: r
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 09:20:13AM -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
> Thanks *very* much for taking the time to reply rob0 - it forced
> me to re-examine my prior attempts...
>
> On 2012-03-18 6:13 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> >On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 12:32:33PM -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
> >My assumptio
With postscreen configuration I've an ldap error when the recipient is
not in the ldap (a bad recipient) :
Error :
Mar 16 15:13:09 relais1 postfix/smtpd[23031]: warning:
dict_ldap_connect: Unable to bind to server ldap://ldap.domain.fr:389
with dn uid=binduser,o=domain,c=fr: -1 (Can't contact
Thanks *very* much for taking the time to reply rob0 - it forced me to
re-examine my prior attempts...
On 2012-03-18 6:13 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 12:32:33PM -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
My assumption was that smtpd_sender_restrictions would evaluate
before smtpd_recipient_
Wietse:
> What are the differences between the smtpd lines with and without
> postscreen? Only the first fields (name, type, private) should
> differ.
Stanislas LEVEAU:
> smtpd pass - - - - - smtpd
...
> smtp inet n - n - 1 sm
On 2012.03.19 02.34, mouss wrote:
Le 14/03/2012 03:53, b...@bitrate.net a écrit :
On Mar 13, 2012, at 17.01, mouss wrote:
Le 13/03/2012 19:07, b...@bitrate.net a écrit :
i've been experimenting with delivery for the virtual domain
class to dovecot via lmtp - e.g.
postconf virtual_transport
>Please do not top-post your replies. It makes your old thread much
>harder to follow. Thank you.
>
>On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 11:58:26AM +, Luca Pacor wrote:
>> Now postfix delivers everything @ that.domain to their mailer, also
>> for the user I manage locally:
>>
>> Mar 4 12:24:07 server6 pos
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 10:59:51AM +0200, K bharathan wrote:
> with postscreen i experience the following problem:
> it blocks mail from hotmal as following (from mail log)
>
> Mar 19 10:17:19 relay1 postfix/postscreen[10619]: NOQUEUE: reject:
> RCPT from [65.55.116.21]:55820: 450 4.3.2 Service c
hi all
with postscreen i experience the following problem:
it blocks mail from hotmal as following (from mail log)
Mar 19 10:17:19 relay1 postfix/postscreen[10619]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT
from [65.55.116.21]:55820: 450 4.3.2 Service currently unavailable; from=<
x...@hotmail.com>, to=, proto=ESMTP,
Hi
The différence with postscreen and without postscreen are :
With postscreen :
main.cf configuration file :
postscreen_access_list =
permit_mynetworks,cidr:/etc/postfix/postscreen_access.cidr
postscreen_blacklist_action = drop
postscreen_dnsbl_sites =
zen.spamhaus.org*3
dnsbl.nja
19 matches
Mail list logo
