Alvin Wong:
Hi,
First thank you for trying to help, but it seems that you missed a
part: if I execute `postfix stop; postfix start` manually in the
terminal, the problem is
solved until the next reboot.
Check your SELINUX, APPARMOR etc. security configuration.
Wietse
I read the links and tried some configuration modifications with
soft_bounce and internal_mail_filter_classes parameters but the
notification is still sent to sender. I need to intercept this message
in order to modify one parameter value before sending it.
Le vendredi 01 juin 2012 à 15:09 +0200,
Hi,
I use postfix 2.7.0 on Ubuntu 10.04 LTS
I have some dynamic mail list saved in a Mysq table. Outside programs save the
list of users to deliver to
and then send mail to an alias for the list. This is normally low frequency
mail.
I use a policy server to restrict access to these list and
Peter S?rensen:
Hi,
I use postfix 2.7.0 on Ubuntu 10.04 LTS
I have some dynamic mail list saved in a Mysq table. Outside
programs save the list of users to deliver to and then send mail
to an alias for the list. This is normally low frequency mail.
I use a policy server to restrict
Actually the policy servers just give control back to postfix and let it handle
the final delivery.
I would prefer that. So the policy server only put's on the lock.
Fra: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] P#229;
vegne af
I've been using the default_privs setting to control which user Postfix
uses to deliver mail to external commands. However, I note from the
manual that this setting is only used from an aliases file that is
owned by root, or when delivery is done on behalf of root.
I've come across instances when
Thanks, it's really the SELinux problem. The labels of some files in
`/var/spool/postfix/pid` have the wrong label set. Running
`/sbin/restorecon -rv /var/spool/postfix/pid/*` fixed the problem. So
my problem is now solved.
But I have no idea why the labels are changed themselves, though. Will
it
On Jun 4, 2012, at 10:31, Wael MANAI wrote:
I read the links and tried some configuration modifications with soft_bounce
and internal_mail_filter_classes parameters but the notification is still
sent to sender. I need to intercept this message in order to modify one
parameter value before
Hello
This has been a nut that i haven't been able to crack for a long time
now and i was wondering how one would solve this problem.
My setup is the following:
a) Multiple domains hosted in a single box
b) Postfix delivers emails to virtual mailboxes (so all the domains run
under the same
Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org writes:
For the record: mynetworks has always supported net/mask notation.
Of course, but that wasn't what I was talking about, and it never was.
I was talking about permit_mynetworks working properly with an ipv6
link local address specified in mynetworks,
Den 2012-06-04 15:23, Elaconta.com Webmaster skrev:
I'm getting kind of desperate so i'm probably going to do something
very hacky like running a routine every 10 minutes or so that does
the
following:
desperate ?, but where is the sources ? :=)
with dovecot one could make dict in mysql,
Benny Pedersen escreveu:
Den 2012-06-04 15:23, Elaconta.com Webmaster skrev:
I'm getting kind of desperate so i'm probably going to do something
very hacky like running a routine every 10 minutes or so that does the
following:
desperate ?, but where is the sources ? :=)
with dovecot one
Den 2012-06-04 15:51, Elaconta.com Webmaster skrev:
I'm using Courier-IMAP, not Dovecot. What do you mean by sources? :/
then make an perl policyd that checks imap protocol and reports back to
policy protocol in postfix, no scripting is needed
Benny Pedersen escreveu:
Den 2012-06-04 15:51, Elaconta.com Webmaster skrev:
I'm using Courier-IMAP, not Dovecot. What do you mean by sources? :/
then make an perl policyd that checks imap protocol and reports back
to policy protocol in postfix, no scripting is needed
Okay, but how would
Den 2012-06-04 16:05, Elaconta.com Webmaster skrev:
Okay, but how would i make such a policyd? I'd have to check the
quota for all the Mailboxes in the domain of the receiving email and
add them to get the total domain quota, right? Each time a email is
received?
policy protocol in postfix is
Hi Banyan
after a couple of tries the email goes in the mailbox
drwxrwsr-x 2 root mail (/var/spool/mail/)
Octavio
--- El vie, 6/1/12, Banyan He ban...@rootong.com escribió:
De: Banyan He ban...@rootong.com
Asunto: Re: Repeated emails
A: Octavio octaviomai...@yahoo.com
Cc:
Peter S?rensen:
Any way to get a hook that make it possible to do some handling
after the mail is delivered?
Wietse
If the mail delivering program is outside Postfix, wrap the program
in a script that unlocks your table after successful email delivery,
before it returns control to Postfix.
We are seeing a message that I don't understand on our postfix servers with
postscreen enabled. Here is a rejection message from maillog when a test
tries to e-mail abuse@ address:
2012-06-04T12:45:23.773219-04:00 mx2 postfix/postscreen[4312]: NOQUEUE:
reject: RCPT from [174.133.202.226]:2860:
On 6/4/2012 2:07 PM, james wrote:
We are seeing a message that I don't understand on our postfix servers
with postscreen enabled. Here is a rejection message from maillog when
a test tries to e-mail abuse@ address:
2012-06-04T12:45:23.773219-04:00 mx2 postfix/postscreen[4312]:
NOQUEUE:
Am 04.06.2012 20:07, schrieb james:
Service currently unavailable doesn't make sense as a rejection message
it make sperfectly sense because this is as example how
greylisting works, a proper sender will try later
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
You enabled some deep protocol tests as documented:
http://www.postfix.org/POSTSCREEN_README.html#after_220
OK, I wondered if this was part of it because I did see that it couldn't
pass the connection over to smtpd and would require the other host to try
again. I guess I wasn't expecting to
Am 04.06.2012 22:00, schrieb James Chase:
You enabled some deep protocol tests as documented:
http://www.postfix.org/POSTSCREEN_README.html#after_220
OK, I wondered if this was part of it because I did see that it couldn't
pass the connection over to smtpd and would require the other
you see in your log usually the same as the client get as answer what is
helpful if someone is complaining to you about getting message XYZ
you see in your log usually the same as the client get as answer what
is helpful if someone is complaining to you about getting message XYZ
I agree
On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 10:38:02AM +0100, Andrew Beverley wrote:
I've been using the default_privs setting to control which user
Postfix uses to deliver mail to external commands. However, I note
from the manual that this setting is only used from an aliases
file that is owned by root, or
yes, but you are missing that this message is the answer of postgrey which
is
only redirected via postfix to the client, from the view of SMTP it is 450
That's OK -- postgrey is supplying me with useful information which quickly
leads me to the answer to my question: why is this message 450?
Le 04/06/2012 11:48, Alvin Wong a écrit :
Thanks, it's really the SELinux problem. The labels of some files in
`/var/spool/postfix/pid` have the wrong label set. Running
`/sbin/restorecon -rv /var/spool/postfix/pid/*` fixed the problem. So
my problem is now solved.
But I have no idea why
* james ja...@wintercastle.net:
We are seeing a message that I don't understand on our postfix servers with
postscreen enabled. Here is a rejection message from maillog when a test
tries to e-mail abuse@ address:
2012-06-04T12:45:23.773219-04:00 mx2 postfix/postscreen[4312]: NOQUEUE:
27 matches
Mail list logo
