On 03.08.2012 23:59, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
On 3/8/2012 4:49 μμ, Wietse Venema wrote:
Has the program worked after it was installed? Then find out what
has changed recently. One of those changes broke Postfix.
Searching in logs, I found it was working correctly until Jul 13,
when I upgraded t
Nikolaos Milas:
> On 3/8/2012 4:49 ??, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> > Has the program worked after it was installed? Then find out what
> > has changed recently. One of those changes broke Postfix.
> >
>
> Searching in logs, I found it was working correctly until Jul 13, when I
> upgraded to CentOS
On 3/8/2012 4:49 μμ, Wietse Venema wrote:
Has the program worked after it was installed? Then find out what
has changed recently. One of those changes broke Postfix.
Searching in logs, I found it was working correctly until Jul 13, when I
upgraded to CentOS 6.3.
I now upgraded to Postfix 2
Reinaldo,
thanks a lot man!
Best,
Doug
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Reinaldo de Carvalho wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 2:38 PM, Douglas D. J. de Macedo
> wrote:
> >
> > Using a comand postmap asking for the virtual user (mailAlternateAddress)
> > the results are:
> >
> > #postmap -q doug.
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 2:38 PM, Douglas D. J. de Macedo
wrote:
>
> Using a comand postmap asking for the virtual user (mailAlternateAddress)
> the results are:
>
> #postmap -q doug...@yyy.ufsc.br ldap:accountsmap
> doug...@xxx.ufsc.br
>
> But if I try to "real" user, the command don't works:
>
> #
Guys,
I have a strange situation here and I'll need help!
I configured a mail server, normally, and some users are sending and
receiving email normally, as follow below:
Aug 3 14:20:27 cranio postfix/smtp[12872]: 47E7B222107C: to=<
te...@xxx.ufsc.br>, orig_to=,
relay=127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]:10024,
On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 03:47:16PM +0530, DN Singh wrote:
> I have newsletter setup of around 4k users. I am trying to implement verp
> to parse bounced email-ids. So, I need to implement catch-all setup. I have
> tested the script with IMAP and am not satisfied with the result. So, I
> want to te
On 03.08.2012 15:41, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
Basically, I've installed (and I am using):
[root@dc postfix]# rpm -qa | grep ltb
openldap-ltb-2.4.31-1.el6.x86_64
berkeleydb-ltb-4.6.21.NC-4.el6.patch4.x86_64
openldap-ltb-debuginfo-2.4.31-1.el6.x86_64
There also exist:
db4-4.7.25-17.el6.x86_64
db4-u
Nikolaos Milas:
> Any ideas?
Has the program worked after it was installed? Then find out what
has changed recently. One of those changes broke Postfix.
Has the program never worked after it was installed? Then it was
built incorrectly. Follow my instructions or ask your maintainer.
I give supp
On 3/8/2012 4:16 μμ, Wietse Venema wrote:
ldd(1) is your friend.
Thanks Wietse,
Does this help?
[root@dc postfix]# ldd smtp
linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x7fff275ff000)
libldap-2.4.so.2 => /usr/local/openldap/lib64/libldap-2.4.so.2
(0x7fe2b796d000)
liblber-2.4.so.2 => /usr/local/openldap/lib
Ben,
An issue I'm trying to solve - but never mind - I figured out a simpler way
with transport maps.
Mike Durket
On Aug 2, 2012, at 2:36 PM, Ben Rosengart wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 12:02:56PM -0700, Michael Durket wrote:
>> I have a host (A) acting as an MX for host (B). Currentl
Nikolaos Milas:
> Aug 3 15:09:46 dc postfix/master[13988]: warning: process
> /usr/libexec/postfix/smtp pid 13997 killed by signal 11
If the program worked before this happened, suspect DLL hell.
Mixing different versions of Berkeley DB, upgrading a third-party
library (SASL, etc.) that introduc
Hi,
I've got a vanilla Postfix on CentOS 6.3:
[root@dc ~]# rpm -qa | grep postfix
postfix-2.6.6-2.2.el6_1.x86_64
It's not a major mail server, just being used to redirect local mail
using a /root/.forward file.
I have other similar systems, running without problems. This one however
throws
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Ansgar Wiechers wrote:
> On 2012-08-03 DN Singh wrote:
> > I have a setup to receive mails for a subdomain, which is also the
> > hostname of the server. I want to use system users as mailboxes. This
> > used to work fine until I implemented catch-all address. I add
On 2012-08-03 DN Singh wrote:
> I have a setup to receive mails for a subdomain, which is also the
> hostname of the server. I want to use system users as mailboxes. This
> used to work fine until I implemented catch-all address. I added an
> entry "@domain.tld u...@domain.tld" in virtual map. But,
Hello Group,
I have a setup to receive mails for a subdomain, which is also the hostname
of the server. I want to use system users as mailboxes. This used to work
fine until I implemented catch-all address. I added an entry "@domain.tld
u...@domain.tld" in virtual map. But, all mails
16 matches
Mail list logo
